风险分层——我的风险是什么?从业者的工具

I. Preston
{"title":"风险分层——我的风险是什么?从业者的工具","authors":"I. Preston","doi":"10.21693/1933-088x-18.3.84","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At the 6th World Symposium on Pulmonary Hypertension, the task force on clinical risk stratification and medical therapy in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) reviewed the latest developments published in the field of therapeutics since the previous meeting and presented their consensus opinions to an audience of 1376 participant attendees between February 27 and March 1, 2018, in Nice, France. After participants’ input was incorporated, the final recommendations were published in the European Respiratory Journal. In the past several years, treatment for PAH was based on several parameters to determine the severity of the disease and risk of progression and poor outcome. These parameters included New York Heart Association Functional Class (NYHA FC), exercise capacity represented by the 6-minute walk distance (6MWD), and echocardiographic and hemodynamic measurements. Until recently, the guidelines for initiation and escalation of therapy relied mostly upon NYHA FC. However, data from 3 independent registries demonstrate the importance of a methodical risk assessment and treatment strategy in PAH patients. All registries prove that, in order to obtain a good outcome (assessed as event-free survival at 1 year), patients need to achieve a low-risk status.","PeriodicalId":92747,"journal":{"name":"Advances in pulmonary hypertension","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk Stratification—What's My Risk? A Practitioner's Tool\",\"authors\":\"I. Preston\",\"doi\":\"10.21693/1933-088x-18.3.84\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"At the 6th World Symposium on Pulmonary Hypertension, the task force on clinical risk stratification and medical therapy in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) reviewed the latest developments published in the field of therapeutics since the previous meeting and presented their consensus opinions to an audience of 1376 participant attendees between February 27 and March 1, 2018, in Nice, France. After participants’ input was incorporated, the final recommendations were published in the European Respiratory Journal. In the past several years, treatment for PAH was based on several parameters to determine the severity of the disease and risk of progression and poor outcome. These parameters included New York Heart Association Functional Class (NYHA FC), exercise capacity represented by the 6-minute walk distance (6MWD), and echocardiographic and hemodynamic measurements. Until recently, the guidelines for initiation and escalation of therapy relied mostly upon NYHA FC. However, data from 3 independent registries demonstrate the importance of a methodical risk assessment and treatment strategy in PAH patients. All registries prove that, in order to obtain a good outcome (assessed as event-free survival at 1 year), patients need to achieve a low-risk status.\",\"PeriodicalId\":92747,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in pulmonary hypertension\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in pulmonary hypertension\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21693/1933-088x-18.3.84\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in pulmonary hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21693/1933-088x-18.3.84","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在第六届世界肺动脉高压研讨会上,肺动脉高压(PAH)临床风险分层和药物治疗工作组回顾了自上次会议以来在治疗学领域发表的最新进展,并于2018年2月27日至3月1日在法国尼斯向1376名与会者提出了他们的共识意见。在纳入了参与者的意见后,最终的建议发表在《欧洲呼吸杂志》上。在过去的几年里,PAH的治疗是基于几个参数来确定疾病的严重程度、进展风险和不良结局。这些参数包括纽约心脏协会功能等级(NYHA FC)、6分钟步行距离(6MWD)代表的运动能力、超声心动图和血流动力学测量。直到最近,治疗开始和升级的指南主要依赖于NYHA FC。然而,来自3个独立登记处的数据表明,对PAH患者进行系统的风险评估和治疗策略的重要性。所有注册证明,为了获得良好的结果(评估为1年无事件生存期),患者需要达到低风险状态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Risk Stratification—What's My Risk? A Practitioner's Tool
At the 6th World Symposium on Pulmonary Hypertension, the task force on clinical risk stratification and medical therapy in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) reviewed the latest developments published in the field of therapeutics since the previous meeting and presented their consensus opinions to an audience of 1376 participant attendees between February 27 and March 1, 2018, in Nice, France. After participants’ input was incorporated, the final recommendations were published in the European Respiratory Journal. In the past several years, treatment for PAH was based on several parameters to determine the severity of the disease and risk of progression and poor outcome. These parameters included New York Heart Association Functional Class (NYHA FC), exercise capacity represented by the 6-minute walk distance (6MWD), and echocardiographic and hemodynamic measurements. Until recently, the guidelines for initiation and escalation of therapy relied mostly upon NYHA FC. However, data from 3 independent registries demonstrate the importance of a methodical risk assessment and treatment strategy in PAH patients. All registries prove that, in order to obtain a good outcome (assessed as event-free survival at 1 year), patients need to achieve a low-risk status.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信