关于博物馆法案的两个观点

Q3 Arts and Humanities

Muzealnictwo Pub Date : 2021-10-06 DOI:10.5604/01.3001.0015.3455

Alicja Jagielska-Burduk, Piotr Stec

{"title":"关于博物馆法案的两个观点","authors":"Alicja Jagielska-Burduk, Piotr Stec","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0015.3455","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the paper the analysis of two newly published\ncommentaries (2021) on the Act on Museums is conducted:\nthe first commentary by A. Barbasiewicz, a lawyer\nspecializing in cultural heritage, and the other by a team\nof scholars: Z. Cieślik, I. Gredka-Ligarska, P. Gwoździewicz-\n-Matan, I. Lipowicz, A. Matan, K. Zeidler specializing\nin administrative proceedings and legal protection of\nhistoric monuments. Both publications represent various\nperspectives on the same issue, thus complementing one\nanother. The difference in the approach makes them both\nuseful to experienced practitioners on the one hand and\nthose who happen to confront these topics for the first time\none the other. Importantly, both have been written in a clear\nlanguage comprehensible to non-lawyers. Their high-rating\ncannot be diminished by the few critical remarks formulated\nin the paper.\n\n","PeriodicalId":36577,"journal":{"name":"Muzealnictwo","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"TWO PERSPECTIVES ON THE ACT ON MUSEUMS\",\"authors\":\"Alicja Jagielska-Burduk, Piotr Stec\",\"doi\":\"10.5604/01.3001.0015.3455\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the paper the analysis of two newly published\\ncommentaries (2021) on the Act on Museums is conducted:\\nthe first commentary by A. Barbasiewicz, a lawyer\\nspecializing in cultural heritage, and the other by a team\\nof scholars: Z. Cieślik, I. Gredka-Ligarska, P. Gwoździewicz-\\n-Matan, I. Lipowicz, A. Matan, K. Zeidler specializing\\nin administrative proceedings and legal protection of\\nhistoric monuments. Both publications represent various\\nperspectives on the same issue, thus complementing one\\nanother. The difference in the approach makes them both\\nuseful to experienced practitioners on the one hand and\\nthose who happen to confront these topics for the first time\\none the other. Importantly, both have been written in a clear\\nlanguage comprehensible to non-lawyers. Their high-rating\\ncannot be diminished by the few critical remarks formulated\\nin the paper.\\n\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":36577,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Muzealnictwo\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Muzealnictwo\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0015.3455\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Muzealnictwo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0015.3455","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

在这篇论文中，对两份新发表的关于《博物馆法》的意见书（2021年）进行了分析：第一份意见书由专门研究文化遗产的律师A.Barbasiewicz撰写，另一份意见书则由一组学者撰写：Z.Cieślik、I.Gredka Ligarska、P.Gwo Roz dzewicz-Matan、I.Lipowicz、A.Matan，K。蔡德勒专门从事行政诉讼和历史古迹的法律保护。这两份出版物都代表了对同一问题的不同观点，因此相互补充。这种方法的差异一方面使它们对经验丰富的从业者有用，另一方面也使那些碰巧第一次面对这些主题的人有用。重要的是，两者都是用非律师可以理解的清晰语言写成的。他们的高评价不能因论文中的几句批评性言论而减弱。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

TWO PERSPECTIVES ON THE ACT ON MUSEUMS

In the paper the analysis of two newly published commentaries (2021) on the Act on Museums is conducted: the first commentary by A. Barbasiewicz, a lawyer specializing in cultural heritage, and the other by a team of scholars: Z. Cieślik, I. Gredka-Ligarska, P. Gwoździewicz- -Matan, I. Lipowicz, A. Matan, K. Zeidler specializing in administrative proceedings and legal protection of historic monuments. Both publications represent various perspectives on the same issue, thus complementing one another. The difference in the approach makes them both useful to experienced practitioners on the one hand and those who happen to confront these topics for the first time one the other. Importantly, both have been written in a clear language comprehensible to non-lawyers. Their high-rating cannot be diminished by the few critical remarks formulated in the paper.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Muzealnictwo Arts and Humanities-Museology

CiteScore

0.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

8 weeks