斯洛文尼亚的政治两极分化及其对自由民主的影响

IF 0.2 Q4 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Matevž Malčič
{"title":"斯洛文尼亚的政治两极分化及其对自由民主的影响","authors":"Matevž Malčič","doi":"10.51936/tip.60.1.24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Concerns have been raised over the possible link between the growing political polarisation and fears of autocratisation in Slovenia. Faced with a lack of empirical data, we seek to answer two questions. First, how has political polarisation developed in Slovenia? We show that Slovenia has experienced massive increases in both ideological and affective polarisation on the levels of the citizenry and political parties. Second, what has been the effect of political polarisation on liberal democracy in Slovenia? A GLS (generalised least squares) model for the period 1992 to 2022 confirms negative effects only for affective, but not ideological polarisation regarding V-Dem’s liberal democracy and judicial constraints on the executive indices. Keywords: Slovenia, affective polarisation, ideological polarisation, autocratisation, SJM","PeriodicalId":44389,"journal":{"name":"TEORIJA IN PRAKSA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"POLITICAL POLARISATION IN SLOVENIA AND ITS EFFECTS ON LIBERAL DEMOCRACY\",\"authors\":\"Matevž Malčič\",\"doi\":\"10.51936/tip.60.1.24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Concerns have been raised over the possible link between the growing political polarisation and fears of autocratisation in Slovenia. Faced with a lack of empirical data, we seek to answer two questions. First, how has political polarisation developed in Slovenia? We show that Slovenia has experienced massive increases in both ideological and affective polarisation on the levels of the citizenry and political parties. Second, what has been the effect of political polarisation on liberal democracy in Slovenia? A GLS (generalised least squares) model for the period 1992 to 2022 confirms negative effects only for affective, but not ideological polarisation regarding V-Dem’s liberal democracy and judicial constraints on the executive indices. Keywords: Slovenia, affective polarisation, ideological polarisation, autocratisation, SJM\",\"PeriodicalId\":44389,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"TEORIJA IN PRAKSA\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"TEORIJA IN PRAKSA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51936/tip.60.1.24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TEORIJA IN PRAKSA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51936/tip.60.1.24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人们对斯洛文尼亚日益严重的政治两极分化与对独裁的担忧之间可能存在的联系表示担忧。面对缺乏实证数据,我们试图回答两个问题。首先,斯洛文尼亚的政治两极分化是如何发展的?我们表明,斯洛文尼亚在公民和政党层面上经历了意识形态和情感两极分化的大幅加剧。其次,政治两极分化对斯洛文尼亚的自由民主产生了什么影响?1992年至2022年期间的GLS(广义最小二乘)模型仅证实了对V-Dem的自由民主和对行政指数的司法约束的情感两极分化的负面影响,而不是意识形态两极分化。关键词:斯洛文尼亚,情感两极分化,意识形态两极分化,独裁,圣犹达
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
POLITICAL POLARISATION IN SLOVENIA AND ITS EFFECTS ON LIBERAL DEMOCRACY
Concerns have been raised over the possible link between the growing political polarisation and fears of autocratisation in Slovenia. Faced with a lack of empirical data, we seek to answer two questions. First, how has political polarisation developed in Slovenia? We show that Slovenia has experienced massive increases in both ideological and affective polarisation on the levels of the citizenry and political parties. Second, what has been the effect of political polarisation on liberal democracy in Slovenia? A GLS (generalised least squares) model for the period 1992 to 2022 confirms negative effects only for affective, but not ideological polarisation regarding V-Dem’s liberal democracy and judicial constraints on the executive indices. Keywords: Slovenia, affective polarisation, ideological polarisation, autocratisation, SJM
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
TEORIJA IN PRAKSA
TEORIJA IN PRAKSA SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
25.00%
发文量
43
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信