非终极剪辑:死亡现实主义电影的生物政治

IF 0.3 3区 文学 0 LITERATURE, SLAVIC
Ellina Sattarova
{"title":"非终极剪辑:死亡现实主义电影的生物政治","authors":"Ellina Sattarova","doi":"10.1016/j.ruslit.2022.12.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The article examines the biopolitical aspects of necrorealist cinematic experiments of the 1980s. Engaging in dialogue with Alexei Yurchak, who in his discussion of necrorealist biopolitics implicitly disavows the group’s cinematic efforts, the article shows that the “necro-” aspects of necrorealism emerged as a result of the group’s engagement with images. The cinematic medium, with its paradox of simultaneous stillness and motion, was particularly well-equipped to produce what the necrorealists called noncorpses, hybrid entities that challenge the absolute separation of the human and the inhuman, political and bare life. Paradoxically, however, the necrorealist project of dismantling boundaries was ultimately dependent on boundaries itself: the mediating shield of a cinematic screen, the safety of the editing room, and the time- and space-defying capacity of the cinematic cut.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":43192,"journal":{"name":"RUSSIAN LITERATURE","volume":"141 ","pages":"Pages 85-109"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Non-final Cut: The Biopolitics of Necrorealist Cinema\",\"authors\":\"Ellina Sattarova\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ruslit.2022.12.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The article examines the biopolitical aspects of necrorealist cinematic experiments of the 1980s. Engaging in dialogue with Alexei Yurchak, who in his discussion of necrorealist biopolitics implicitly disavows the group’s cinematic efforts, the article shows that the “necro-” aspects of necrorealism emerged as a result of the group’s engagement with images. The cinematic medium, with its paradox of simultaneous stillness and motion, was particularly well-equipped to produce what the necrorealists called noncorpses, hybrid entities that challenge the absolute separation of the human and the inhuman, political and bare life. Paradoxically, however, the necrorealist project of dismantling boundaries was ultimately dependent on boundaries itself: the mediating shield of a cinematic screen, the safety of the editing room, and the time- and space-defying capacity of the cinematic cut.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43192,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"RUSSIAN LITERATURE\",\"volume\":\"141 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 85-109\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"RUSSIAN LITERATURE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304347922001284\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, SLAVIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RUSSIAN LITERATURE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304347922001284","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, SLAVIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文考察了20世纪80年代死亡现实主义电影实验的生命政治方面。通过与Alexei Yurchak的对话(Alexei Yurchak在他关于死亡现实主义生命政治的讨论中含蓄地否认了该组织在电影方面的努力),这篇文章表明,死亡现实主义的“死亡”方面是该组织与图像接触的结果。电影媒介具有静止与运动同时发生的悖论,特别适合制作被死亡现实主义者称为“非尸体”的混合实体,挑战人类与非人、政治与赤裸裸的生命的绝对分离。然而,矛盾的是,拆除边界的死亡现实主义项目最终依赖于边界本身:电影屏幕的中介盾牌,编辑室的安全,以及电影剪辑的时间和空间挑战能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Non-final Cut: The Biopolitics of Necrorealist Cinema

The article examines the biopolitical aspects of necrorealist cinematic experiments of the 1980s. Engaging in dialogue with Alexei Yurchak, who in his discussion of necrorealist biopolitics implicitly disavows the group’s cinematic efforts, the article shows that the “necro-” aspects of necrorealism emerged as a result of the group’s engagement with images. The cinematic medium, with its paradox of simultaneous stillness and motion, was particularly well-equipped to produce what the necrorealists called noncorpses, hybrid entities that challenge the absolute separation of the human and the inhuman, political and bare life. Paradoxically, however, the necrorealist project of dismantling boundaries was ultimately dependent on boundaries itself: the mediating shield of a cinematic screen, the safety of the editing room, and the time- and space-defying capacity of the cinematic cut.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
RUSSIAN LITERATURE
RUSSIAN LITERATURE LITERATURE, SLAVIC-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: Russian Literature combines issues devoted to special topics of Russian literature with contributions on related subjects in Croatian, Serbian, Czech, Slovak and Polish literatures. Moreover, several issues each year contain articles on heterogeneous subjects concerning Russian Literature. All methods and viewpoints are welcomed, provided they contribute something new, original or challenging to our understanding of Russian and other Slavic literatures. Russian Literature regularly publishes special issues devoted to: • the historical avant-garde in Russian literature and in the other Slavic literatures • the development of descriptive and theoretical poetics in Russian studies and in studies of other Slavic fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信