{"title":"认知语法中的词类新探","authors":"C. Broccias","doi":"10.29162/jez.2021.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Langacker’s Cognitive\nGrammar aims to offer a conceptual characterization of word classes. Pivotal to\nthis endeavor is the distinction between a “thing” and a “relation” as well as\nthe claim that relations can be scanned either sequentially or summarily. The\ndifference between the two scanning modes is essential to separate, for\nexample, enter as a finite verb from\nthe dynamic preposition into. In this\npaper, the debate on the status and relevance of the two scanning modes is\nrevisited and the very notion of relation is subjected to close scrutiny, thus\nrevealing its potentially problematic nature. A new way of looking at word\nclasses based on the notions of evolving vs. non-evolving categorization\nsequences, extrinsicality vs. intrinsicality, and anchorability is developed,\nwhich constitutes a radical departure from Cognitive Grammar despite being\ncompatible with its fundamental assumptions.","PeriodicalId":41610,"journal":{"name":"Jezikoslovlje","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A new look at word classes in Cognitive Grammar\",\"authors\":\"C. Broccias\",\"doi\":\"10.29162/jez.2021.8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Langacker’s Cognitive\\nGrammar aims to offer a conceptual characterization of word classes. Pivotal to\\nthis endeavor is the distinction between a “thing” and a “relation” as well as\\nthe claim that relations can be scanned either sequentially or summarily. The\\ndifference between the two scanning modes is essential to separate, for\\nexample, enter as a finite verb from\\nthe dynamic preposition into. In this\\npaper, the debate on the status and relevance of the two scanning modes is\\nrevisited and the very notion of relation is subjected to close scrutiny, thus\\nrevealing its potentially problematic nature. A new way of looking at word\\nclasses based on the notions of evolving vs. non-evolving categorization\\nsequences, extrinsicality vs. intrinsicality, and anchorability is developed,\\nwhich constitutes a radical departure from Cognitive Grammar despite being\\ncompatible with its fundamental assumptions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41610,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jezikoslovlje\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jezikoslovlje\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29162/jez.2021.8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jezikoslovlje","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29162/jez.2021.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Langacker’s Cognitive
Grammar aims to offer a conceptual characterization of word classes. Pivotal to
this endeavor is the distinction between a “thing” and a “relation” as well as
the claim that relations can be scanned either sequentially or summarily. The
difference between the two scanning modes is essential to separate, for
example, enter as a finite verb from
the dynamic preposition into. In this
paper, the debate on the status and relevance of the two scanning modes is
revisited and the very notion of relation is subjected to close scrutiny, thus
revealing its potentially problematic nature. A new way of looking at word
classes based on the notions of evolving vs. non-evolving categorization
sequences, extrinsicality vs. intrinsicality, and anchorability is developed,
which constitutes a radical departure from Cognitive Grammar despite being
compatible with its fundamental assumptions.