认知语法中的词类新探

IF 0.2 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Jezikoslovlje Pub Date : 2021-12-20 DOI:10.29162/jez.2021.8
C. Broccias
{"title":"认知语法中的词类新探","authors":"C. Broccias","doi":"10.29162/jez.2021.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Langacker’s Cognitive\nGrammar aims to offer a conceptual characterization of word classes. Pivotal to\nthis endeavor is the distinction between a “thing” and a “relation” as well as\nthe claim that relations can be scanned either sequentially or summarily. The\ndifference between the two scanning modes is essential to separate, for\nexample, enter as a finite verb from\nthe dynamic preposition into. In this\npaper, the debate on the status and relevance of the two scanning modes is\nrevisited and the very notion of relation is subjected to close scrutiny, thus\nrevealing its potentially problematic nature. A new way of looking at word\nclasses based on the notions of evolving vs. non-evolving categorization\nsequences, extrinsicality vs. intrinsicality, and anchorability is developed,\nwhich constitutes a radical departure from Cognitive Grammar despite being\ncompatible with its fundamental assumptions.","PeriodicalId":41610,"journal":{"name":"Jezikoslovlje","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A new look at word classes in Cognitive Grammar\",\"authors\":\"C. Broccias\",\"doi\":\"10.29162/jez.2021.8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Langacker’s Cognitive\\nGrammar aims to offer a conceptual characterization of word classes. Pivotal to\\nthis endeavor is the distinction between a “thing” and a “relation” as well as\\nthe claim that relations can be scanned either sequentially or summarily. The\\ndifference between the two scanning modes is essential to separate, for\\nexample, enter as a finite verb from\\nthe dynamic preposition into. In this\\npaper, the debate on the status and relevance of the two scanning modes is\\nrevisited and the very notion of relation is subjected to close scrutiny, thus\\nrevealing its potentially problematic nature. A new way of looking at word\\nclasses based on the notions of evolving vs. non-evolving categorization\\nsequences, extrinsicality vs. intrinsicality, and anchorability is developed,\\nwhich constitutes a radical departure from Cognitive Grammar despite being\\ncompatible with its fundamental assumptions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41610,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jezikoslovlje\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jezikoslovlje\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29162/jez.2021.8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jezikoslovlje","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29162/jez.2021.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Langacker的认知语法旨在提供单词类别的概念表征。这项努力的关键是区分“事物”和“关系”,以及声称关系可以按顺序或概括地扫描。这两种扫描模式之间的差异对于区分,例如,作为有限动词的enter和动态介词into至关重要。在本文中,对这两种扫描模式的地位和相关性进行了辩论,并对关系的概念进行了仔细的审查,从而揭示了其潜在的问题性质。基于进化与非进化分类序列、外在性与内在性以及可锚定性的概念,发展了一种看待单词类的新方法,尽管与认知语法的基本假设相兼容,但这与认知语法构成了根本的背离。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A new look at word classes in Cognitive Grammar
Langacker’s Cognitive Grammar aims to offer a conceptual characterization of word classes. Pivotal to this endeavor is the distinction between a “thing” and a “relation” as well as the claim that relations can be scanned either sequentially or summarily. The difference between the two scanning modes is essential to separate, for example, enter as a finite verb from the dynamic preposition into. In this paper, the debate on the status and relevance of the two scanning modes is revisited and the very notion of relation is subjected to close scrutiny, thus revealing its potentially problematic nature. A new way of looking at word classes based on the notions of evolving vs. non-evolving categorization sequences, extrinsicality vs. intrinsicality, and anchorability is developed, which constitutes a radical departure from Cognitive Grammar despite being compatible with its fundamental assumptions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Jezikoslovlje
Jezikoslovlje LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信