创业意向研究:一种确定理论和研究新方向的混合文献计量学方法

IF 3.4 3区 管理学 Q2 MANAGEMENT
Michela Loi, Manuel Castriotta, Saulo Dubard Barbosa, M. Chiara Di Guardo, Alain Fayolle
{"title":"创业意向研究:一种确定理论和研究新方向的混合文献计量学方法","authors":"Michela Loi,&nbsp;Manuel Castriotta,&nbsp;Saulo Dubard Barbosa,&nbsp;M. Chiara Di Guardo,&nbsp;Alain Fayolle","doi":"10.1111/emre.12599","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Fragmentation is the main obstacle to scientific progress on entrepreneurial intention. To address this issue, we systematise the current literature with a hybrid bibliometric method that combines co-citation and bibliographic coupling analysis for the first time in entrepreneurial intention studies to show the field's knowledge base and research fronts and to examine how divergent perspectives have challenged the core knowledge of the field. We highlight three recurring dimensions of entrepreneurial intention studies: (1) personal factors, (2) social factors and (3) investigational settings. In addition to introducing new constructs, divergent perspectives have emphasised the interplay between these components and challenged the mechanisms connecting them. Based on these findings, we extend previous classifications in the literature by providing a framework that integrates divergent perspectives with the field's knowledge base, helping establish future research avenues and improving the theorising process of entrepreneurial intention.</p>","PeriodicalId":47372,"journal":{"name":"European Management Review","volume":"21 3","pages":"581-604"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/emre.12599","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Entrepreneurial intention studies: A hybrid bibliometric method to identify new directions for theory and research\",\"authors\":\"Michela Loi,&nbsp;Manuel Castriotta,&nbsp;Saulo Dubard Barbosa,&nbsp;M. Chiara Di Guardo,&nbsp;Alain Fayolle\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/emre.12599\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Fragmentation is the main obstacle to scientific progress on entrepreneurial intention. To address this issue, we systematise the current literature with a hybrid bibliometric method that combines co-citation and bibliographic coupling analysis for the first time in entrepreneurial intention studies to show the field's knowledge base and research fronts and to examine how divergent perspectives have challenged the core knowledge of the field. We highlight three recurring dimensions of entrepreneurial intention studies: (1) personal factors, (2) social factors and (3) investigational settings. In addition to introducing new constructs, divergent perspectives have emphasised the interplay between these components and challenged the mechanisms connecting them. Based on these findings, we extend previous classifications in the literature by providing a framework that integrates divergent perspectives with the field's knowledge base, helping establish future research avenues and improving the theorising process of entrepreneurial intention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47372,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Management Review\",\"volume\":\"21 3\",\"pages\":\"581-604\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/emre.12599\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Management Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/emre.12599\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Management Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/emre.12599","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

碎片化是阻碍创业意愿科学进步的主要障碍。为了解决这个问题,我们首次在创业意向研究中使用混合文献计量方法将当前文献系统化,该方法结合了共引和文献耦合分析,以显示该领域的知识库和研究前沿,并考察不同的观点如何挑战该领域的核心知识。我们强调了创业意向研究的三个重复维度:(1)个人因素,(2)社会因素和(3)调查环境。除了引入新的结构外,不同的观点还强调了这些组成部分之间的相互作用,并对连接它们的机制提出了挑战。基于这些发现,我们扩展了文献中以前的分类,提供了一个框架,将不同的观点与该领域的知识库相结合,帮助建立未来的研究途径,并改进创业意图的理论化过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Entrepreneurial intention studies: A hybrid bibliometric method to identify new directions for theory and research

Entrepreneurial intention studies: A hybrid bibliometric method to identify new directions for theory and research

Fragmentation is the main obstacle to scientific progress on entrepreneurial intention. To address this issue, we systematise the current literature with a hybrid bibliometric method that combines co-citation and bibliographic coupling analysis for the first time in entrepreneurial intention studies to show the field's knowledge base and research fronts and to examine how divergent perspectives have challenged the core knowledge of the field. We highlight three recurring dimensions of entrepreneurial intention studies: (1) personal factors, (2) social factors and (3) investigational settings. In addition to introducing new constructs, divergent perspectives have emphasised the interplay between these components and challenged the mechanisms connecting them. Based on these findings, we extend previous classifications in the literature by providing a framework that integrates divergent perspectives with the field's knowledge base, helping establish future research avenues and improving the theorising process of entrepreneurial intention.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
13.50%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: The European Management Review is an international journal dedicated to advancing the understanding of management in private and public sector organizations through empirical investigation and theoretical analysis. The European Management Review provides an international forum for dialogue between researchers, thereby improving the understanding of the nature of management in different settings and promoting the transfer of research results to management practice. Although one of the European Management Review"s aims is to foster the general advancement of management scholarship among European scholars and/or those academics interested in European management issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信