“那开头呢?”

IF 0.9 4区 文学 Q3 COMMUNICATION
Kimberly R. Kelly, Grace Ocular, Jennifer Zamudio, Jesús Plascencia
{"title":"“那开头呢?”","authors":"Kimberly R. Kelly, Grace Ocular, Jennifer Zamudio, Jesús Plascencia","doi":"10.1075/ni.19082.kel","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This mixed model study first implemented a quantitative approach to investigate the structural coherence of the narratives\n that 3- to 6-year old children construct with and without their mothers. We then employed qualitative analysis to identify and categorize\n strategies that mothers used to scaffold their children’s developing sequencing skill during narrative conversations. Analysis of 233\n co-constructed and 209 independent past-event narratives from 65 mother-child dyads revealed that the children produced narratives with a\n range of structural coherence both independently and with maternal assistance. Chronological narratives were the most common structure\n produced with and without assistance, but leapfrog narratives persisted in the dyadic context. Five distinct patterns of maternal strategies\n that provided chronological structure to their children’s leapfrogs emerged. We discuss the ways in which the maternal strategies identified\n promote early literacy skills through scaffolding and modeling school-like literacy practices in everyday conversations.","PeriodicalId":46671,"journal":{"name":"Narrative Inquiry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“But what about the beginning?”\",\"authors\":\"Kimberly R. Kelly, Grace Ocular, Jennifer Zamudio, Jesús Plascencia\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/ni.19082.kel\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This mixed model study first implemented a quantitative approach to investigate the structural coherence of the narratives\\n that 3- to 6-year old children construct with and without their mothers. We then employed qualitative analysis to identify and categorize\\n strategies that mothers used to scaffold their children’s developing sequencing skill during narrative conversations. Analysis of 233\\n co-constructed and 209 independent past-event narratives from 65 mother-child dyads revealed that the children produced narratives with a\\n range of structural coherence both independently and with maternal assistance. Chronological narratives were the most common structure\\n produced with and without assistance, but leapfrog narratives persisted in the dyadic context. Five distinct patterns of maternal strategies\\n that provided chronological structure to their children’s leapfrogs emerged. We discuss the ways in which the maternal strategies identified\\n promote early literacy skills through scaffolding and modeling school-like literacy practices in everyday conversations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46671,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Narrative Inquiry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Narrative Inquiry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.19082.kel\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Narrative Inquiry","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.19082.kel","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

这项混合模型研究首先采用了定量方法来调查3- 6岁儿童在有母亲和没有母亲的情况下构建的叙事的结构一致性。然后,我们采用定性分析来识别和分类母亲在叙事对话中用来支撑孩子发展顺序技能的策略。对来自65对母子的233篇共同建构和209篇独立建构的过去事件叙事的分析表明,孩子们在独立和母亲的帮助下产生了一系列结构连贯的叙事。无论有无辅助,编年叙事都是最常见的结构,但跳跃式叙事在二元语境中依然存在。五种不同的母亲策略模式为孩子的跨越提供了时间结构。我们讨论了确定的母亲策略如何通过在日常对话中搭建和模拟学校式的识字实践来促进早期识字技能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“But what about the beginning?”
This mixed model study first implemented a quantitative approach to investigate the structural coherence of the narratives that 3- to 6-year old children construct with and without their mothers. We then employed qualitative analysis to identify and categorize strategies that mothers used to scaffold their children’s developing sequencing skill during narrative conversations. Analysis of 233 co-constructed and 209 independent past-event narratives from 65 mother-child dyads revealed that the children produced narratives with a range of structural coherence both independently and with maternal assistance. Chronological narratives were the most common structure produced with and without assistance, but leapfrog narratives persisted in the dyadic context. Five distinct patterns of maternal strategies that provided chronological structure to their children’s leapfrogs emerged. We discuss the ways in which the maternal strategies identified promote early literacy skills through scaffolding and modeling school-like literacy practices in everyday conversations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Narrative Inquiry
Narrative Inquiry Multiple-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
14.30%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: Narrative Inquiry is devoted to providing a forum for theoretical, empirical, and methodological work on narrative. Articles appearing in Narrative Inquiry draw upon a variety of approaches and methodologies in the study of narrative as a way to give contour to experience, tradition, and values to next generations. Particular emphasis is placed on theoretical approaches to narrative and the analysis of narratives in human interaction, including those practiced by researchers in psychology, linguistics and related disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信