书评:《机构素养:参与学术信息技术背景下的写作和交流》,作者:Stuart A. Selber

IF 1.8 2区 文学 Q3 BUSINESS
L. Dush
{"title":"书评:《机构素养:参与学术信息技术背景下的写作和交流》,作者:Stuart A. Selber","authors":"L. Dush","doi":"10.1177/10506519211044713","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Stuart A. Selber’s new book, Institutional Literacies: Engaging Academic IT Contexts for Writing and Communication, published in the midst of the global pandemic’s great shift to remote learning, explores the neglected topic of academic information and technology (IT). Selber defines academic IT as “centralized campus units responsible for planning, implementing, managing, and evaluating information technologies for institutional purposes” (p. xi). If academic IT units were a powerful force shaping local teaching and learning practices prior to 2020, they are even more so now. Our universities would simply not function at this historical moment without the technologies, policies, and people of academic IT. In arguing that writing and communication teachers should strategically engage with academic IT, Selber has done the field an important service, providing both grounds and methods for future pedagogical, administrative, and research projects that engage these powerful institutional entities. Overall, Selber approaches academic IT from a rhetorical and institutional perspective, arguing that teachers must understand academic IT units as particular local formations. The book both reflects and leverages Selber’s many years of engagement with academic IT at his home institution, Penn State University. Its central contribution is a three-part heuristic to guide teachers of writing and communication as they historicize, spatialize, and textualize academic IT units on their campus. The heuristic, Selber says, will help teachers to “order their thinking about what academic IT units Book Review","PeriodicalId":46414,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business and Technical Communication","volume":"36 1","pages":"120 - 123"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Book Review: Institutional Literacies: Engaging Academic IT Contexts for Writing and Communication by Stuart A. Selber\",\"authors\":\"L. Dush\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10506519211044713\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Stuart A. Selber’s new book, Institutional Literacies: Engaging Academic IT Contexts for Writing and Communication, published in the midst of the global pandemic’s great shift to remote learning, explores the neglected topic of academic information and technology (IT). Selber defines academic IT as “centralized campus units responsible for planning, implementing, managing, and evaluating information technologies for institutional purposes” (p. xi). If academic IT units were a powerful force shaping local teaching and learning practices prior to 2020, they are even more so now. Our universities would simply not function at this historical moment without the technologies, policies, and people of academic IT. In arguing that writing and communication teachers should strategically engage with academic IT, Selber has done the field an important service, providing both grounds and methods for future pedagogical, administrative, and research projects that engage these powerful institutional entities. Overall, Selber approaches academic IT from a rhetorical and institutional perspective, arguing that teachers must understand academic IT units as particular local formations. The book both reflects and leverages Selber’s many years of engagement with academic IT at his home institution, Penn State University. Its central contribution is a three-part heuristic to guide teachers of writing and communication as they historicize, spatialize, and textualize academic IT units on their campus. The heuristic, Selber says, will help teachers to “order their thinking about what academic IT units Book Review\",\"PeriodicalId\":46414,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Business and Technical Communication\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"120 - 123\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Business and Technical Communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10506519211044713\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business and Technical Communication","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10506519211044713","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Stuart A. Selber的新书《机构素养:参与学术IT环境的写作和交流》出版于全球大流行向远程学习的巨大转变期间,探讨了学术信息和技术(IT)这一被忽视的主题。Selber将学术IT定义为“为机构目的负责规划、实施、管理和评估信息技术的集中校园单位”(第xi页)。如果学术IT单位在2020年之前是塑造当地教学实践的强大力量,那么现在更是如此。如果没有学术信息技术的技术、政策和人才,我们的大学将无法在这个历史时刻发挥作用。塞尔伯认为写作和交流教师应该战略性地参与学术信息技术,这为该领域提供了重要的服务,为未来的教学、行政和研究项目提供了基础和方法,让这些强大的机构实体参与其中。总的来说,Selber从修辞和制度的角度来看待学术IT,认为教师必须将学术IT单位理解为特定的地方形式。这本书反映并利用了塞尔伯在他的家乡宾夕法尼亚州立大学从事学术IT多年的经验。它的核心贡献是一个由三部分组成的启发式,指导写作和交流教师将校园里的学术IT单元历史化、空间化和文本化。塞尔伯说,这种启发式方法将帮助教师“对学术IT单元的思考进行排序”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Book Review: Institutional Literacies: Engaging Academic IT Contexts for Writing and Communication by Stuart A. Selber
Stuart A. Selber’s new book, Institutional Literacies: Engaging Academic IT Contexts for Writing and Communication, published in the midst of the global pandemic’s great shift to remote learning, explores the neglected topic of academic information and technology (IT). Selber defines academic IT as “centralized campus units responsible for planning, implementing, managing, and evaluating information technologies for institutional purposes” (p. xi). If academic IT units were a powerful force shaping local teaching and learning practices prior to 2020, they are even more so now. Our universities would simply not function at this historical moment without the technologies, policies, and people of academic IT. In arguing that writing and communication teachers should strategically engage with academic IT, Selber has done the field an important service, providing both grounds and methods for future pedagogical, administrative, and research projects that engage these powerful institutional entities. Overall, Selber approaches academic IT from a rhetorical and institutional perspective, arguing that teachers must understand academic IT units as particular local formations. The book both reflects and leverages Selber’s many years of engagement with academic IT at his home institution, Penn State University. Its central contribution is a three-part heuristic to guide teachers of writing and communication as they historicize, spatialize, and textualize academic IT units on their campus. The heuristic, Selber says, will help teachers to “order their thinking about what academic IT units Book Review
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
18.20%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: JBTC is a refereed journal that provides a forum for discussion of communication practices, problems, and trends in business, professional, scientific, and governmental fields. As such, JBTC offers opportunities for bridging dichotomies that have traditionally existed in professional communication journals between business and technical communication and between industrial and academic audiences. Because JBTC is designed to disseminate knowledge that can lead to improved communication practices in both academe and industry, the journal favors research that will inform professional communicators in both sectors. However, articles addressing one sector or the other will also be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信