不同光固化托盘材料与自固化托盘材料尺寸稳定性和抗弯强度的体外比较评价

Q4 Dentistry
Dr Taha Attarwala, Dr Ramandeep Dugal, Dr Aamir Godil, Dr Sanaa Wadwan, Dr Pallavi Madanshetty, Dr Arshi Kazi
{"title":"不同光固化托盘材料与自固化托盘材料尺寸稳定性和抗弯强度的体外比较评价","authors":"Dr Taha Attarwala, Dr Ramandeep Dugal, Dr Aamir Godil, Dr Sanaa Wadwan, Dr Pallavi Madanshetty, Dr Arshi Kazi","doi":"10.5195/d3000.2022.179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: To carry out a comparative evaluation of dimensional stability and flexural strength of different light cured tray materials with self-cured tray material as control.Materials and methods: The study was carried out in four groups based on the different available tray materials. Group A (n=30) – light cured resin (Individo Lux-VOCO™ GmbH Germany); Group B (n=30)- light cured resin (Profibase-VOCO™ GmbH Germany); Group C (n=30)- light cured resin (Plaque Photo-Willmann and Pein™ GmbH Germany); Group D (n=30)- control group-self cured resin (Asian special instant tray material Asian Acrylates™, Mumbai, India). A digital micro-meter was used to measure the length of each specimen first at 1 hour, 24 hour and 48 hour and three readings were taken up to 0.001 decimal. The values for flexural strength of each specimen were measured using the 3-point bending technique with the help of a universal testing machine. The mean values of dimensional stability and flexural strength were calculated by the one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post-hoc test for multiple group`s comparison.Results The mean change in length (in mm) of light cured resins samples were significantly lower than self-cured resin samples at all three time intervals. The flexural strength values of light cured resin samples-Group A (84.46±13.32 N/mm2), B (83.43±14.52 N/mm2) and C (86.80±14.73 N/mm2) was significantly higher than the self-cured resin samples group D (41.29±7.93 N/mm2)Conclusions: Light cured tray materials are more dimensionally stable and have a higher flexural strength compared to self-cured tray materials. ","PeriodicalId":37056,"journal":{"name":"Dentistry 3000","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative evaluation of dimensional stability and flexural strength of different light cured tray materials with self-cured tray material: an in-vitro study\",\"authors\":\"Dr Taha Attarwala, Dr Ramandeep Dugal, Dr Aamir Godil, Dr Sanaa Wadwan, Dr Pallavi Madanshetty, Dr Arshi Kazi\",\"doi\":\"10.5195/d3000.2022.179\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives: To carry out a comparative evaluation of dimensional stability and flexural strength of different light cured tray materials with self-cured tray material as control.Materials and methods: The study was carried out in four groups based on the different available tray materials. Group A (n=30) – light cured resin (Individo Lux-VOCO™ GmbH Germany); Group B (n=30)- light cured resin (Profibase-VOCO™ GmbH Germany); Group C (n=30)- light cured resin (Plaque Photo-Willmann and Pein™ GmbH Germany); Group D (n=30)- control group-self cured resin (Asian special instant tray material Asian Acrylates™, Mumbai, India). A digital micro-meter was used to measure the length of each specimen first at 1 hour, 24 hour and 48 hour and three readings were taken up to 0.001 decimal. The values for flexural strength of each specimen were measured using the 3-point bending technique with the help of a universal testing machine. The mean values of dimensional stability and flexural strength were calculated by the one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post-hoc test for multiple group`s comparison.Results The mean change in length (in mm) of light cured resins samples were significantly lower than self-cured resin samples at all three time intervals. The flexural strength values of light cured resin samples-Group A (84.46±13.32 N/mm2), B (83.43±14.52 N/mm2) and C (86.80±14.73 N/mm2) was significantly higher than the self-cured resin samples group D (41.29±7.93 N/mm2)Conclusions: Light cured tray materials are more dimensionally stable and have a higher flexural strength compared to self-cured tray materials. \",\"PeriodicalId\":37056,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dentistry 3000\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dentistry 3000\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5195/d3000.2022.179\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dentistry 3000","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5195/d3000.2022.179","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:以自固化托盘材料为对照,对不同光固化托盘材料的尺寸稳定性和弯曲强度进行比较评价。材料和方法:根据可用托盘材料的不同,分四组进行研究。A组(n=30)-光固化树脂(Individo Lux VOCO™ GmbH Germany);B组(n=30)-光固化树脂(Profibase VOCO™ GmbH Germany);C组(n=30)-光固化树脂(Plaque Photo Willmann和Pein™ GmbH Germany);D组(n=30)-对照组自固化树脂(亚洲专用速溶托盘材料亚洲丙烯酸酯™, 印度孟买)。首先使用数字测微计在1小时、24小时和48小时测量每个样本的长度,并取三个读数,小数点后0.001。在通用试验机的帮助下,使用三点弯曲技术测量每个试样的弯曲强度值。尺寸稳定性和抗弯强度的平均值通过单因素方差分析和Tukey的事后检验计算,用于多组比较。结果在所有三个时间间隔内,光固化树脂样品的平均长度变化(mm)均显著低于自固化树脂样品。光固化树脂样品A组(84.46±13.32 N/mm2)、B组(83.43±14.52 N/mm2)和C组(86.80±14.73 N/mm2)的弯曲强度值显著高于自固化树脂样品D组(41.29±7.93 N/mm2)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative evaluation of dimensional stability and flexural strength of different light cured tray materials with self-cured tray material: an in-vitro study
Objectives: To carry out a comparative evaluation of dimensional stability and flexural strength of different light cured tray materials with self-cured tray material as control.Materials and methods: The study was carried out in four groups based on the different available tray materials. Group A (n=30) – light cured resin (Individo Lux-VOCO™ GmbH Germany); Group B (n=30)- light cured resin (Profibase-VOCO™ GmbH Germany); Group C (n=30)- light cured resin (Plaque Photo-Willmann and Pein™ GmbH Germany); Group D (n=30)- control group-self cured resin (Asian special instant tray material Asian Acrylates™, Mumbai, India). A digital micro-meter was used to measure the length of each specimen first at 1 hour, 24 hour and 48 hour and three readings were taken up to 0.001 decimal. The values for flexural strength of each specimen were measured using the 3-point bending technique with the help of a universal testing machine. The mean values of dimensional stability and flexural strength were calculated by the one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post-hoc test for multiple group`s comparison.Results The mean change in length (in mm) of light cured resins samples were significantly lower than self-cured resin samples at all three time intervals. The flexural strength values of light cured resin samples-Group A (84.46±13.32 N/mm2), B (83.43±14.52 N/mm2) and C (86.80±14.73 N/mm2) was significantly higher than the self-cured resin samples group D (41.29±7.93 N/mm2)Conclusions: Light cured tray materials are more dimensionally stable and have a higher flexural strength compared to self-cured tray materials. 
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Dentistry 3000
Dentistry 3000 Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
19 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信