基于非线性代理有限元分析的板梁桥抗弯承载能力

IF 3 Q2 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Andrew P. Schanck, W. Davids
{"title":"基于非线性代理有限元分析的板梁桥抗弯承载能力","authors":"Andrew P. Schanck, W. Davids","doi":"10.1080/24705314.2021.1934798","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The proxy finite-element analysis (PFEA) technique is significantly extended to improve its utility and its predictions of bridge ultimate capacity are verified. Refinements and extensions to the method include a substantial reduction in up-front computational effort, explicit consideration of the effects of skewness on bridge behavior, and expansion of the technique’s mechanics formulation to include the effects of prestressing. PFEA’s prediction of ultimate flexural capacity is verified by simulating the capacity of a previously conducted, full-scale destructive test of a prestressed concrete girder bridge with good prediction of recorded load-deflection data. Live-load testing (LLT) of five, skewed, reinforced concrete bridges is described. The tested bridges are then load-rated by PFEA, leading to average increase in rating factor exceeding 120%, as compared with an average increase of 34.9% with LLT. This demonstrates that PFEA’s consideration of material nonlinearity leads to larger increases in predicted capacity while retaining the conservative assumptions required by design and analysis codes. Practical usage and implementation of PFEA are addressed, including application to ratings and permitting.","PeriodicalId":43844,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Structural Integrity and Maintenance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Flexural load-rating of slab-on-girder bridges by nonlinear proxy finite-element analysis\",\"authors\":\"Andrew P. Schanck, W. Davids\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/24705314.2021.1934798\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The proxy finite-element analysis (PFEA) technique is significantly extended to improve its utility and its predictions of bridge ultimate capacity are verified. Refinements and extensions to the method include a substantial reduction in up-front computational effort, explicit consideration of the effects of skewness on bridge behavior, and expansion of the technique’s mechanics formulation to include the effects of prestressing. PFEA’s prediction of ultimate flexural capacity is verified by simulating the capacity of a previously conducted, full-scale destructive test of a prestressed concrete girder bridge with good prediction of recorded load-deflection data. Live-load testing (LLT) of five, skewed, reinforced concrete bridges is described. The tested bridges are then load-rated by PFEA, leading to average increase in rating factor exceeding 120%, as compared with an average increase of 34.9% with LLT. This demonstrates that PFEA’s consideration of material nonlinearity leads to larger increases in predicted capacity while retaining the conservative assumptions required by design and analysis codes. Practical usage and implementation of PFEA are addressed, including application to ratings and permitting.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43844,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Structural Integrity and Maintenance\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Structural Integrity and Maintenance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/24705314.2021.1934798\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Structural Integrity and Maintenance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24705314.2021.1934798","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要代理有限元分析(PFEA)技术得到了显著的扩展,以提高其实用性,并验证了其对桥梁极限承载力的预测。该方法的改进和扩展包括大幅减少前期计算工作量,明确考虑斜度对桥梁性能的影响,以及扩展该技术的力学公式以包括预应力的影响。PFEA对极限抗弯承载力的预测通过模拟先前进行的预应力混凝土梁桥全尺寸破坏性试验的承载力进行了验证,并对记录的荷载-挠度数据进行了良好的预测。介绍了五座斜交钢筋混凝土桥梁的活载试验。然后,PFEA对测试桥梁进行额定荷载,导致额定系数的平均增加超过120%,而LLT的平均增加为34.9%。这表明PFEA对材料非线性的考虑导致预测容量的更大增加,同时保留了设计和分析规范所要求的保守假设。PFEA的实际使用和实施,包括评级和许可的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Flexural load-rating of slab-on-girder bridges by nonlinear proxy finite-element analysis
ABSTRACT The proxy finite-element analysis (PFEA) technique is significantly extended to improve its utility and its predictions of bridge ultimate capacity are verified. Refinements and extensions to the method include a substantial reduction in up-front computational effort, explicit consideration of the effects of skewness on bridge behavior, and expansion of the technique’s mechanics formulation to include the effects of prestressing. PFEA’s prediction of ultimate flexural capacity is verified by simulating the capacity of a previously conducted, full-scale destructive test of a prestressed concrete girder bridge with good prediction of recorded load-deflection data. Live-load testing (LLT) of five, skewed, reinforced concrete bridges is described. The tested bridges are then load-rated by PFEA, leading to average increase in rating factor exceeding 120%, as compared with an average increase of 34.9% with LLT. This demonstrates that PFEA’s consideration of material nonlinearity leads to larger increases in predicted capacity while retaining the conservative assumptions required by design and analysis codes. Practical usage and implementation of PFEA are addressed, including application to ratings and permitting.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
9.50%
发文量
24
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信