用于检测南非白细胞异常的自动Sysmex XN-3000分析仪的性能

IF 1 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
African Journal of Laboratory Medicine Pub Date : 2023-07-19 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.4102/ajlm.v12i1.2140
Jasmine Ramiah, Dashini Pillay, Nadine Rapiti
{"title":"用于检测南非白细胞异常的自动Sysmex XN-3000分析仪的性能","authors":"Jasmine Ramiah, Dashini Pillay, Nadine Rapiti","doi":"10.4102/ajlm.v12i1.2140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Automated haematology analysers such as the Sysmex XN-3000 (Sysmex Corporation, Kobe, Japan) utilise white blood cell (WBC) flags to identify quantitative and qualitative abnormalities. Owing to clinical and biological factors, the sensitivity and specificity of the flags vary when compared to microscopy, the gold-standard method for assessing peripheral blood smear (PBS) morphology.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study assessed the performance of the Sysmex XN-3000 haematology analyser in comparison to PBS microscopy for the detection of WBC abnormalities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We collected 250 random full blood count samples from the haematology laboratory at Inkosi Albert Luthuli Central Hospital, Durban, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa, from March 2022 to April 2022. The performance of the automated WBC flags of the Sysmex XN-3000 was assessed in comparison to PBS microscopy, and the impact of established clinical variables on the performance of the flags was determined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sensitivity of the 'blast' flag was 96.3%, and the specificity was 84.9%. The efficiency of the flag was adversely impacted by low white cell counts (< 1.5 × 10<sup>9</sup>/L; <i>p</i> < 0.001), chemotherapy (<i>p</i> = 0.002), malignancy (<i>p</i> = 0.02), and infection (<i>p</i> = 0.02). The 'abnormal lymphocyte' flag demonstrated a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 96.2%, and its performance was adversely impacted by chemotherapy exposure (<i>p</i> = 0.03). Three cases (1.2%) erroneously flagged as 'monocytosis' demonstrated blasts on microscopy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In our setting, PBS microscopy remains necessary to confirm blasts, abnormal lymphocytes, and monocytosis in patients with malignancy, current chemotherapy exposure, low white cell counts, and infection.</p><p><strong>What this study adds: </strong>This study adds evidence that PBS morphology remains the gold standard for confirming WBC abnormalities in patients with a history of malignancy, chemotherapy, and leucopenia.</p>","PeriodicalId":45412,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Laboratory Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10716597/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance of the automated Sysmex XN-3000 analyser for detecting white blood cell abnormalities in South Africa.\",\"authors\":\"Jasmine Ramiah, Dashini Pillay, Nadine Rapiti\",\"doi\":\"10.4102/ajlm.v12i1.2140\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Automated haematology analysers such as the Sysmex XN-3000 (Sysmex Corporation, Kobe, Japan) utilise white blood cell (WBC) flags to identify quantitative and qualitative abnormalities. Owing to clinical and biological factors, the sensitivity and specificity of the flags vary when compared to microscopy, the gold-standard method for assessing peripheral blood smear (PBS) morphology.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study assessed the performance of the Sysmex XN-3000 haematology analyser in comparison to PBS microscopy for the detection of WBC abnormalities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We collected 250 random full blood count samples from the haematology laboratory at Inkosi Albert Luthuli Central Hospital, Durban, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa, from March 2022 to April 2022. The performance of the automated WBC flags of the Sysmex XN-3000 was assessed in comparison to PBS microscopy, and the impact of established clinical variables on the performance of the flags was determined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sensitivity of the 'blast' flag was 96.3%, and the specificity was 84.9%. The efficiency of the flag was adversely impacted by low white cell counts (< 1.5 × 10<sup>9</sup>/L; <i>p</i> < 0.001), chemotherapy (<i>p</i> = 0.002), malignancy (<i>p</i> = 0.02), and infection (<i>p</i> = 0.02). The 'abnormal lymphocyte' flag demonstrated a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 96.2%, and its performance was adversely impacted by chemotherapy exposure (<i>p</i> = 0.03). Three cases (1.2%) erroneously flagged as 'monocytosis' demonstrated blasts on microscopy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In our setting, PBS microscopy remains necessary to confirm blasts, abnormal lymphocytes, and monocytosis in patients with malignancy, current chemotherapy exposure, low white cell counts, and infection.</p><p><strong>What this study adds: </strong>This study adds evidence that PBS morphology remains the gold standard for confirming WBC abnormalities in patients with a history of malignancy, chemotherapy, and leucopenia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45412,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"African Journal of Laboratory Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10716597/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"African Journal of Laboratory Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4102/ajlm.v12i1.2140\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/ajlm.v12i1.2140","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:自动血液学分析仪,如Sysmex XN-3000(Sysmex Corporation,Kobe,Japan),利用白细胞(WBC)标志来识别定量和定性异常。由于临床和生物学因素,与显微镜(评估外周血涂片(PBS)形态的金标准方法)相比,flags的敏感性和特异性各不相同。目的:本研究评估了Sysmex XN-3000血液分析仪与PBS显微镜检测WBC异常的性能。方法:2022年3月至2022年4月,我们从南非夸祖鲁-纳塔尔州德班Inkosi Albert Luthuli中央医院的血液学实验室随机采集了250份全血细胞计数样本。与PBS显微镜相比,对Sysmex XN-3000的自动WBC标志的性能进行了评估,并确定了已建立的临床变量对标志性能的影响。结果:“blast”标志的敏感性为96.3%,特异性为84.9%。低白细胞计数(1.5×,其表现受到化疗暴露的不利影响(p=0.03)。三例(1.2%)被错误标记为“单核细胞增多症”的病例在显微镜下显示有成纤维细胞。结论:在我们的环境中,PBS显微镜仍然是必要的,以确认恶性肿瘤、当前化疗暴露、白细胞计数低和感染患者的母细胞、异常淋巴细胞和单核细胞增多症。这项研究补充道:这项研究增加了证据,证明PBS形态仍然是确认有恶性肿瘤、化疗和白细胞减少史患者WBC异常的金标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance of the automated Sysmex XN-3000 analyser for detecting white blood cell abnormalities in South Africa.

Background: Automated haematology analysers such as the Sysmex XN-3000 (Sysmex Corporation, Kobe, Japan) utilise white blood cell (WBC) flags to identify quantitative and qualitative abnormalities. Owing to clinical and biological factors, the sensitivity and specificity of the flags vary when compared to microscopy, the gold-standard method for assessing peripheral blood smear (PBS) morphology.

Objective: This study assessed the performance of the Sysmex XN-3000 haematology analyser in comparison to PBS microscopy for the detection of WBC abnormalities.

Methods: We collected 250 random full blood count samples from the haematology laboratory at Inkosi Albert Luthuli Central Hospital, Durban, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa, from March 2022 to April 2022. The performance of the automated WBC flags of the Sysmex XN-3000 was assessed in comparison to PBS microscopy, and the impact of established clinical variables on the performance of the flags was determined.

Results: The sensitivity of the 'blast' flag was 96.3%, and the specificity was 84.9%. The efficiency of the flag was adversely impacted by low white cell counts (< 1.5 × 109/L; p < 0.001), chemotherapy (p = 0.002), malignancy (p = 0.02), and infection (p = 0.02). The 'abnormal lymphocyte' flag demonstrated a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 96.2%, and its performance was adversely impacted by chemotherapy exposure (p = 0.03). Three cases (1.2%) erroneously flagged as 'monocytosis' demonstrated blasts on microscopy.

Conclusion: In our setting, PBS microscopy remains necessary to confirm blasts, abnormal lymphocytes, and monocytosis in patients with malignancy, current chemotherapy exposure, low white cell counts, and infection.

What this study adds: This study adds evidence that PBS morphology remains the gold standard for confirming WBC abnormalities in patients with a history of malignancy, chemotherapy, and leucopenia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
African Journal of Laboratory Medicine
African Journal of Laboratory Medicine MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
53
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The African Journal of Laboratory Medicine, the official journal of ASLM, focuses on the role of the laboratory and its professionals in the clinical and public healthcare sectors,and is specifically based on an African frame of reference. Emphasis is on all aspects that promote and contribute to the laboratory medicine practices of Africa. This includes, amongst others: laboratories, biomedical scientists and clinicians, medical community, public health officials and policy makers, laboratory systems and policies (translation of laboratory knowledge, practices and technologies in clinical care), interfaces of laboratory with medical science, laboratory-based epidemiology, laboratory investigations, evidence-based effectiveness in real world (actual) settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信