认知能力与创造力:类型学贡献与元分析综述

IF 3.3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Andra Serban , Sven Kepes , Wenhao Wang , Robert Baldwin
{"title":"认知能力与创造力:类型学贡献与元分析综述","authors":"Andra Serban ,&nbsp;Sven Kepes ,&nbsp;Wenhao Wang ,&nbsp;Robert Baldwin","doi":"10.1016/j.intell.2023.101757","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Our meta-analysis provides a comprehensive examination of the correlation between cognitive ability and creativity. Introducing an integrative typology of creativity, we assess how, at the individual level, cognitive ability at Stratum III, as well as different cognitive ability dimensions at Stratum II from Carroll's (1993) Three-Stratum Theory, correlate with three creativity perspectives (person, process, and product), and different dimensions within them. Using 135 independent samples containing 65,829 subjects, we found an observed meta-analytic correlation between cognitive ability at Stratum III and overall creativity of 0.27 (the corrected mean correlation was 0.33). The mean correlation was strongest for variables in the process perspective of creativity. We also observed that the Stratum II dimensions of cognitive ability most strongly related to creativity are broad retrieval ability and broad visual perception. In addition, we found that several conceptual and methodological moderators (e.g., cognitive ability measure, creativity measure, creativity domain, type of ratings) had a noticeable impact on the strength of the meta-analytic correlation. Dominance and sensitivity analyses tended to support our meta-analytic results. We discuss our study's contributions and practical implications and suggest future research avenues.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":13862,"journal":{"name":"Intelligence","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cognitive ability and creativity: Typology contributions and a meta-analytic review\",\"authors\":\"Andra Serban ,&nbsp;Sven Kepes ,&nbsp;Wenhao Wang ,&nbsp;Robert Baldwin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.intell.2023.101757\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Our meta-analysis provides a comprehensive examination of the correlation between cognitive ability and creativity. Introducing an integrative typology of creativity, we assess how, at the individual level, cognitive ability at Stratum III, as well as different cognitive ability dimensions at Stratum II from Carroll's (1993) Three-Stratum Theory, correlate with three creativity perspectives (person, process, and product), and different dimensions within them. Using 135 independent samples containing 65,829 subjects, we found an observed meta-analytic correlation between cognitive ability at Stratum III and overall creativity of 0.27 (the corrected mean correlation was 0.33). The mean correlation was strongest for variables in the process perspective of creativity. We also observed that the Stratum II dimensions of cognitive ability most strongly related to creativity are broad retrieval ability and broad visual perception. In addition, we found that several conceptual and methodological moderators (e.g., cognitive ability measure, creativity measure, creativity domain, type of ratings) had a noticeable impact on the strength of the meta-analytic correlation. Dominance and sensitivity analyses tended to support our meta-analytic results. We discuss our study's contributions and practical implications and suggest future research avenues.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13862,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Intelligence\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Intelligence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289623000387\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289623000387","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们的荟萃分析提供了认知能力和创造力之间相关性的全面检查。引入创造力的综合类型学,我们评估了在个人层面上,第三层的认知能力,以及卡罗尔(1993)三层理论中第二层的不同认知能力维度,如何与三个创造力视角(人、过程和产品)以及其中的不同维度相关联。使用135个独立样本,包含65,829名受试者,我们发现第三阶层的认知能力与整体创造力之间的元分析相关性为0.27(校正后的平均相关性为0.33)。在创造力的过程视角中,变量的平均相关性最强。我们还观察到,与创造力关系最密切的认知能力的第二层维度是广义检索能力和广义视觉感知能力。此外,我们发现几个概念和方法调节因子(如认知能力测量、创造力测量、创造力领域、评分类型)对元分析相关性的强度有显著影响。优势和敏感性分析倾向于支持我们的元分析结果。我们讨论了本研究的贡献和实际意义,并提出了未来的研究方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cognitive ability and creativity: Typology contributions and a meta-analytic review

Our meta-analysis provides a comprehensive examination of the correlation between cognitive ability and creativity. Introducing an integrative typology of creativity, we assess how, at the individual level, cognitive ability at Stratum III, as well as different cognitive ability dimensions at Stratum II from Carroll's (1993) Three-Stratum Theory, correlate with three creativity perspectives (person, process, and product), and different dimensions within them. Using 135 independent samples containing 65,829 subjects, we found an observed meta-analytic correlation between cognitive ability at Stratum III and overall creativity of 0.27 (the corrected mean correlation was 0.33). The mean correlation was strongest for variables in the process perspective of creativity. We also observed that the Stratum II dimensions of cognitive ability most strongly related to creativity are broad retrieval ability and broad visual perception. In addition, we found that several conceptual and methodological moderators (e.g., cognitive ability measure, creativity measure, creativity domain, type of ratings) had a noticeable impact on the strength of the meta-analytic correlation. Dominance and sensitivity analyses tended to support our meta-analytic results. We discuss our study's contributions and practical implications and suggest future research avenues.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Intelligence
Intelligence PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
13.30%
发文量
64
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: This unique journal in psychology is devoted to publishing original research and theoretical studies and review papers that substantially contribute to the understanding of intelligence. It provides a new source of significant papers in psychometrics, tests and measurement, and all other empirical and theoretical studies in intelligence and mental retardation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信