除了创新之外,企业是否从与公共研究机构的互动中受益?对小企业的分析

IF 7.1 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Jaider Vega-Jurado , Ana García-Granero , Liney Manjarrés-Henríquez
{"title":"除了创新之外,企业是否从与公共研究机构的互动中受益?对小企业的分析","authors":"Jaider Vega-Jurado ,&nbsp;Ana García-Granero ,&nbsp;Liney Manjarrés-Henríquez","doi":"10.1016/j.iedeen.2021.100148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this paper we argue that there is an extensive number of studies examining how firms obtain new products from their interactions with scientific agents, but other type of benefits has been overlooked. Specifically, we add to previous literature by considering not only product innovation, but also exploratory (long-term) and exploitative (short-term) results. We administer a tailored survey to firms collaborating with the Spanish National Research Council (CSIC) and data was completed with secondary sources. Results based on a sample of 756 firms suggest that firms consider all types of result as moderately important to them. Moreover, we observe that small firms report higher benefits in terms of product innovation and long-term results in contrast to large firms.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45796,"journal":{"name":"European Research on Management and Business Economics","volume":"27 2","pages":"Article 100148"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.iedeen.2021.100148","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do firms benefit from interactions with public research organisations beyond innovation? An analysis of small firms\",\"authors\":\"Jaider Vega-Jurado ,&nbsp;Ana García-Granero ,&nbsp;Liney Manjarrés-Henríquez\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.iedeen.2021.100148\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In this paper we argue that there is an extensive number of studies examining how firms obtain new products from their interactions with scientific agents, but other type of benefits has been overlooked. Specifically, we add to previous literature by considering not only product innovation, but also exploratory (long-term) and exploitative (short-term) results. We administer a tailored survey to firms collaborating with the Spanish National Research Council (CSIC) and data was completed with secondary sources. Results based on a sample of 756 firms suggest that firms consider all types of result as moderately important to them. Moreover, we observe that small firms report higher benefits in terms of product innovation and long-term results in contrast to large firms.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45796,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Research on Management and Business Economics\",\"volume\":\"27 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 100148\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.iedeen.2021.100148\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Research on Management and Business Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2444883421000073\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Research on Management and Business Economics","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2444883421000073","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

在本文中,我们认为有大量的研究考察了企业如何从与科学代理人的相互作用中获得新产品,但其他类型的利益被忽视了。具体而言,我们不仅考虑了产品创新,还考虑了探索性(长期)和剥削性(短期)结果,从而补充了之前的文献。我们对与西班牙国家研究委员会(CSIC)合作的公司进行了量身定制的调查,数据由二手来源完成。基于756家公司样本的结果表明,公司认为所有类型的结果对他们来说都是中等重要的。此外,我们观察到,与大公司相比,小企业在产品创新和长期成果方面报告的收益更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Do firms benefit from interactions with public research organisations beyond innovation? An analysis of small firms

In this paper we argue that there is an extensive number of studies examining how firms obtain new products from their interactions with scientific agents, but other type of benefits has been overlooked. Specifically, we add to previous literature by considering not only product innovation, but also exploratory (long-term) and exploitative (short-term) results. We administer a tailored survey to firms collaborating with the Spanish National Research Council (CSIC) and data was completed with secondary sources. Results based on a sample of 756 firms suggest that firms consider all types of result as moderately important to them. Moreover, we observe that small firms report higher benefits in terms of product innovation and long-term results in contrast to large firms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
3.40%
发文量
30
审稿时长
50 weeks
期刊介绍: European Research on Management and Business Economics (ERMBE) was born in 1995 as Investigaciones Europeas de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa (IEDEE). The journal is published by the European Academy of Management and Business Economics (AEDEM) under this new title since 2016, it was indexed in SCOPUS in 2012 and in Thomson Reuters Emerging Sources Citation Index in 2015. From the beginning, the aim of the Journal is to foster academic research by publishing original research articles that meet the highest analytical standards, and provide new insights that contribute and spread the business management knowledge
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信