欧洲边界向软法律的转变：在法律效率与法律效力之间

Q2 Social Sciences

Global Jurist Pub Date : 2022-10-19 DOI:10.1515/gj-2022-0040

Martino Reviglio

{"title":"欧洲边界向软法律的转变：在法律效率与法律效力之间","authors":"Martino Reviglio","doi":"10.1515/gj-2022-0040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In contemporary politics of migration governance, the criterion of legal validity is hindered by legal efficiency. Or parliamentary government before executive governance. This tension between legal efficiency and legal validity can emerge in bilateral soft agreements. The article analyses the EU-Turkey Statement (2016) and the Memorandum of Understanding between Libya and Italy (2017). From these bilateral soft agreements, a turn from legal validity to legal efficiency can be observed. The efficiency criterion, by replacing the one of validity, limits significantly the role of the Parliaments and thus affects the overall institutional balance and the rule of law. The article recognises the geopolitical contingences that determine the adoption of soft law bilateral agreements. However, it suggests reflecting on how legal forms are manipulated to externalise and securitise the borders of Europe by retuning border management from legal efficiency towards legal validity, or in other words from soft to hard law.","PeriodicalId":34941,"journal":{"name":"Global Jurist","volume":"23 1","pages":"23 - 41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Shift to Soft Law at Europe Borders: Between Legal Efficiency and Legal Validity\",\"authors\":\"Martino Reviglio\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/gj-2022-0040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract In contemporary politics of migration governance, the criterion of legal validity is hindered by legal efficiency. Or parliamentary government before executive governance. This tension between legal efficiency and legal validity can emerge in bilateral soft agreements. The article analyses the EU-Turkey Statement (2016) and the Memorandum of Understanding between Libya and Italy (2017). From these bilateral soft agreements, a turn from legal validity to legal efficiency can be observed. The efficiency criterion, by replacing the one of validity, limits significantly the role of the Parliaments and thus affects the overall institutional balance and the rule of law. The article recognises the geopolitical contingences that determine the adoption of soft law bilateral agreements. However, it suggests reflecting on how legal forms are manipulated to externalise and securitise the borders of Europe by retuning border management from legal efficiency towards legal validity, or in other words from soft to hard law.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34941,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Jurist\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"23 - 41\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Jurist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/gj-2022-0040\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Jurist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/gj-2022-0040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要在当代移民治理政治中，法律效力的标准受到法律效率的阻碍。或者在行政治理之前的议会政府。这种法律效率和法律效力之间的紧张关系可以在双边软协议中出现。文章分析了欧盟-土耳其声明（2016年）和利比亚与意大利谅解备忘录（2017年）。从这些双边软协议中可以看到从法律效力到法律效率的转变。效率标准取代了有效性标准，极大地限制了议会的作用，从而影响了整体体制平衡和法治。该条款承认决定采用软法双边协议的地缘政治偶然性。然而，它建议反思如何操纵法律形式，通过将边境管理从法律效率重新调整为法律效力，或者换句话说，从软法律调整为硬法律，将欧洲边境外部化和证券化。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The Shift to Soft Law at Europe Borders: Between Legal Efficiency and Legal Validity

Abstract In contemporary politics of migration governance, the criterion of legal validity is hindered by legal efficiency. Or parliamentary government before executive governance. This tension between legal efficiency and legal validity can emerge in bilateral soft agreements. The article analyses the EU-Turkey Statement (2016) and the Memorandum of Understanding between Libya and Italy (2017). From these bilateral soft agreements, a turn from legal validity to legal efficiency can be observed. The efficiency criterion, by replacing the one of validity, limits significantly the role of the Parliaments and thus affects the overall institutional balance and the rule of law. The article recognises the geopolitical contingences that determine the adoption of soft law bilateral agreements. However, it suggests reflecting on how legal forms are manipulated to externalise and securitise the borders of Europe by retuning border management from legal efficiency towards legal validity, or in other words from soft to hard law.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Global Jurist Social Sciences-Law

CiteScore

1.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Global Jurist offers a forum for scholarly cyber-debate on issues of comparative law, law and economics, international law, law and society, and legal anthropology. Edited by an international board of leading comparative law scholars from all the continents, Global Jurist is mindful of globalization and respectful of cultural differences. We will develop a truly international community of legal scholars where linguistic and cultural barriers are overcome and legal issues are finally discussed outside of the narrow limits imposed by positivism, parochialism, ethnocentrism, imperialism and chauvinism in the law. Submission is welcome from all over the world and particularly encouraged from the Global South.