三种商品化酶联免疫吸附法诊断猪瘟的比较

Q4 Veterinary
Fernando Aguilar-Vargas, Fabián Carvajal, M. Guzmán, Bernal León
{"title":"三种商品化酶联免疫吸附法诊断猪瘟的比较","authors":"Fernando Aguilar-Vargas, Fabián Carvajal, M. Guzmán, Bernal León","doi":"10.5380/avs.v28i2.90894","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Classical swine fever (CSF) is a highly contagious viral disease that affects pigs and wild boars. The disease can cause significant economic losses in the pig industry and poses a threat to food security. Therefore, it is crucial to have effective surveillance programs to detect and control the disease. The study mentioned above aimed to compare three commercial ELISA kits for the detection of CSF antibodies. The results showed that all three kits had 100% congruence in undiluted samples, indicating that they are highly reliable for use as a screening test on routine samples. Additionally, the study found good reproducibility between technicians with no significant influence on the variation of results. However, the study also identified a low consistency of positive results (37.7%) for the kit IDvet Screen E2 in diluted samples, with significant variations in results from all three kits. This finding suggests that the other two kits, Herdchek E2 and Priocheck E2, may be better suited for detecting animals with low levels of antibodies, allowing for earlier detection of infected animals and the implementation of relevant control measures. In conclusion, the study demonstrates the importance of using high-quality commercial ELISA kits for the surveillance of CSF. The findings suggest that any of the three kits tested could be used as a reliable screening test on routine samples. However, for the detection of animals with low levels of antibodies, the Herdchek E2 and Priocheck E2 kits may be more effective","PeriodicalId":8351,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Veterinary Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of three commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for the diagnosis of Classical Swine Fever\",\"authors\":\"Fernando Aguilar-Vargas, Fabián Carvajal, M. Guzmán, Bernal León\",\"doi\":\"10.5380/avs.v28i2.90894\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Classical swine fever (CSF) is a highly contagious viral disease that affects pigs and wild boars. The disease can cause significant economic losses in the pig industry and poses a threat to food security. Therefore, it is crucial to have effective surveillance programs to detect and control the disease. The study mentioned above aimed to compare three commercial ELISA kits for the detection of CSF antibodies. The results showed that all three kits had 100% congruence in undiluted samples, indicating that they are highly reliable for use as a screening test on routine samples. Additionally, the study found good reproducibility between technicians with no significant influence on the variation of results. However, the study also identified a low consistency of positive results (37.7%) for the kit IDvet Screen E2 in diluted samples, with significant variations in results from all three kits. This finding suggests that the other two kits, Herdchek E2 and Priocheck E2, may be better suited for detecting animals with low levels of antibodies, allowing for earlier detection of infected animals and the implementation of relevant control measures. In conclusion, the study demonstrates the importance of using high-quality commercial ELISA kits for the surveillance of CSF. The findings suggest that any of the three kits tested could be used as a reliable screening test on routine samples. However, for the detection of animals with low levels of antibodies, the Herdchek E2 and Priocheck E2 kits may be more effective\",\"PeriodicalId\":8351,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Veterinary Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Veterinary Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5380/avs.v28i2.90894\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Veterinary\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Veterinary Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5380/avs.v28i2.90894","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Veterinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

猪瘟是一种高度传染性的病毒性疾病,影响猪和野猪。这种疾病会给养猪业造成重大经济损失,并对粮食安全构成威胁。因此,制定有效的监测计划来检测和控制这种疾病至关重要。上述研究旨在比较三种用于检测CSF抗体的商业ELISA试剂盒。结果显示,所有三种试剂盒在未稀释的样本中都有100%的一致性,这表明它们在用作常规样本的筛查测试时是高度可靠的。此外,研究发现,技术人员之间具有良好的再现性,对结果的变化没有显著影响。然而,该研究还发现,试剂盒IDvet Screen E2在稀释样本中的阳性结果一致性较低(37.7%),所有三个试剂盒的结果都有显著差异。这一发现表明,其他两种试剂盒,Herdchek E2和Priocheck E2,可能更适合检测抗体水平较低的动物,从而能够更早地检测受感染的动物并实施相关的控制措施。总之,该研究证明了使用高质量商业ELISA试剂盒监测CSF的重要性。研究结果表明,所测试的三种试剂盒中的任何一种都可以作为常规样本的可靠筛查测试。然而,对于抗体水平较低的动物的检测,Herdchek E2和Priocheck E2试剂盒可能更有效
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of three commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for the diagnosis of Classical Swine Fever
Classical swine fever (CSF) is a highly contagious viral disease that affects pigs and wild boars. The disease can cause significant economic losses in the pig industry and poses a threat to food security. Therefore, it is crucial to have effective surveillance programs to detect and control the disease. The study mentioned above aimed to compare three commercial ELISA kits for the detection of CSF antibodies. The results showed that all three kits had 100% congruence in undiluted samples, indicating that they are highly reliable for use as a screening test on routine samples. Additionally, the study found good reproducibility between technicians with no significant influence on the variation of results. However, the study also identified a low consistency of positive results (37.7%) for the kit IDvet Screen E2 in diluted samples, with significant variations in results from all three kits. This finding suggests that the other two kits, Herdchek E2 and Priocheck E2, may be better suited for detecting animals with low levels of antibodies, allowing for earlier detection of infected animals and the implementation of relevant control measures. In conclusion, the study demonstrates the importance of using high-quality commercial ELISA kits for the surveillance of CSF. The findings suggest that any of the three kits tested could be used as a reliable screening test on routine samples. However, for the detection of animals with low levels of antibodies, the Herdchek E2 and Priocheck E2 kits may be more effective
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of Veterinary Science
Archives of Veterinary Science Veterinary-Veterinary (all)
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
90 weeks
期刊介绍: O periódico ARCHIVES OF VETERINARY SCIENCE (AVS) é publicado trimestralmente, sob orientação do seu Corpo Editorial, com a finalidade de divulgar artigos completos e de revisão relacionados à ciência animal sobre os temas: clínica, cirurgia e patologia veterinária; sanidade animal e medicina veterinária preventiva; nutrição e alimentação animal; sistemas de produção animal e meio ambiente; reprodução e melhoramento genético animal; tecnologia de alimentos; economia e sociologia rural e métodos de investigação científica. A publicação dos artigos científicos dependerá da observância das normas editoriais e dos pareceres dos consultores “ad hoc”.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信