从学生满意度到影响:方法限制下的影响评估

IF 0.8 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Student Success Pub Date : 2022-07-06 DOI:10.5204/ssj.2339
Rhonda Leece, Caroline Rueckert, Daniel Madden
{"title":"从学生满意度到影响:方法限制下的影响评估","authors":"Rhonda Leece, Caroline Rueckert, Daniel Madden","doi":"10.5204/ssj.2339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigated the impact of Queensland University of Technology (QUT) student engagement with co-curricular services in 2020. With limited institutional data, it is often not possible to gauge the cumulative impact of all retention and teaching activities, and while any one support activity cannot carry the weight of improving student outcomes, it is important to consider the impact of each as a contributing factor. We asked ourselves: How exactly do we determine how students’ connection to services is impacting learning? How do they connect to wider university expectations such as widening participation initiatives or retention activities? And how do we use evaluative strategies productively to mature our service design so that we can move beyond “satisfaction” to “impact”? Despite methodological constraints, converging lines of evidence indicate that engagement with services in 2020 had a small, but statistically significant, positive impact on grade point average (GPA), progression, and retention.","PeriodicalId":43777,"journal":{"name":"Student Success","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From Student Satisfaction to Impact: Approaching Impact Evaluation in the Context of Methodological Constraints\",\"authors\":\"Rhonda Leece, Caroline Rueckert, Daniel Madden\",\"doi\":\"10.5204/ssj.2339\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study investigated the impact of Queensland University of Technology (QUT) student engagement with co-curricular services in 2020. With limited institutional data, it is often not possible to gauge the cumulative impact of all retention and teaching activities, and while any one support activity cannot carry the weight of improving student outcomes, it is important to consider the impact of each as a contributing factor. We asked ourselves: How exactly do we determine how students’ connection to services is impacting learning? How do they connect to wider university expectations such as widening participation initiatives or retention activities? And how do we use evaluative strategies productively to mature our service design so that we can move beyond “satisfaction” to “impact”? Despite methodological constraints, converging lines of evidence indicate that engagement with services in 2020 had a small, but statistically significant, positive impact on grade point average (GPA), progression, and retention.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43777,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Student Success\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Student Success\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5204/ssj.2339\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Student Success","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5204/ssj.2339","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究调查了2020年昆士兰科技大学(QUT)学生参与课外服务的影响。由于机构数据有限,通常不可能衡量所有保留和教学活动的累积影响,尽管任何一项支持活动都不能起到改善学生成绩的作用,但重要的是要将每一项活动的影响视为一个促成因素。我们问自己:我们如何确定学生与服务的联系是如何影响学习的?它们如何与更广泛的大学期望联系起来,比如扩大参与计划或留校活动?我们如何有效地使用评估策略来成熟我们的服务设计,以便我们能够超越“满意度”到“影响”?尽管存在方法上的限制,但趋同的证据线表明,在2020年,参与服务对平均绩点(GPA)、晋升和保留率产生了很小但在统计上显著的积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
From Student Satisfaction to Impact: Approaching Impact Evaluation in the Context of Methodological Constraints
This study investigated the impact of Queensland University of Technology (QUT) student engagement with co-curricular services in 2020. With limited institutional data, it is often not possible to gauge the cumulative impact of all retention and teaching activities, and while any one support activity cannot carry the weight of improving student outcomes, it is important to consider the impact of each as a contributing factor. We asked ourselves: How exactly do we determine how students’ connection to services is impacting learning? How do they connect to wider university expectations such as widening participation initiatives or retention activities? And how do we use evaluative strategies productively to mature our service design so that we can move beyond “satisfaction” to “impact”? Despite methodological constraints, converging lines of evidence indicate that engagement with services in 2020 had a small, but statistically significant, positive impact on grade point average (GPA), progression, and retention.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Student Success
Student Success EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
16.70%
发文量
20
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信