阴暗面人格量表领域和方面的性别差异不大

Q1 Psychology
Adrian Furnham , Simmy Grover
{"title":"阴暗面人格量表领域和方面的性别差异不大","authors":"Adrian Furnham ,&nbsp;Simmy Grover","doi":"10.1016/j.crbeha.2022.100070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study examined sex differences in domain <em>and</em> facet scores on a new dark-side personality test (Hogan Development Survey: Form 5) measuring sub-clinical personality disorders. Over 50,000 adults completed the new HDS which assesses eleven dark-side traits and three facets of each. Comparing males and females on the 11 domains and 33 facets using t-tests and binary regressions we found that there were many significant differences on these scores, which replicated other studies. However, the Cohen's d statistic showed very few (5 out of 44) differences &gt;0.20. The biggest difference was on Reserved (Schizoid) and few differences on Excitable (Borderline). Implications for researchers interested in assessment and selection are discussed along with limitations of the study.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72746,"journal":{"name":"Current research in behavioral sciences","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100070"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666518222000055/pdfft?md5=2023be4cfb87f26c483a5b60bef288a2&pid=1-s2.0-S2666518222000055-main.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Few sex differences in dark side personality scale domains and facets\",\"authors\":\"Adrian Furnham ,&nbsp;Simmy Grover\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.crbeha.2022.100070\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study examined sex differences in domain <em>and</em> facet scores on a new dark-side personality test (Hogan Development Survey: Form 5) measuring sub-clinical personality disorders. Over 50,000 adults completed the new HDS which assesses eleven dark-side traits and three facets of each. Comparing males and females on the 11 domains and 33 facets using t-tests and binary regressions we found that there were many significant differences on these scores, which replicated other studies. However, the Cohen's d statistic showed very few (5 out of 44) differences &gt;0.20. The biggest difference was on Reserved (Schizoid) and few differences on Excitable (Borderline). Implications for researchers interested in assessment and selection are discussed along with limitations of the study.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72746,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current research in behavioral sciences\",\"volume\":\"3 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100070\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666518222000055/pdfft?md5=2023be4cfb87f26c483a5b60bef288a2&pid=1-s2.0-S2666518222000055-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current research in behavioral sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666518222000055\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Psychology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current research in behavioral sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666518222000055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究在新的黑暗面人格测试(霍根发展调查:表格5)中检测了亚临床人格障碍的领域和面得分的性别差异。超过5万名成年人完成了新的HDS,它评估了11个黑暗面特征和每个黑暗面的三个方面。使用t检验和二元回归比较了11个领域和33个方面的男性和女性,我们发现这些分数存在许多显着差异,这与其他研究重复。然而,科恩的统计数据显示,差异非常少(44人中有5人)[gt;0.20]。在保守型(分裂类)上差异最大,而在易激动型(边缘型)上差异不大。对研究人员感兴趣的评估和选择的意义,以及研究的局限性进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Few sex differences in dark side personality scale domains and facets

This study examined sex differences in domain and facet scores on a new dark-side personality test (Hogan Development Survey: Form 5) measuring sub-clinical personality disorders. Over 50,000 adults completed the new HDS which assesses eleven dark-side traits and three facets of each. Comparing males and females on the 11 domains and 33 facets using t-tests and binary regressions we found that there were many significant differences on these scores, which replicated other studies. However, the Cohen's d statistic showed very few (5 out of 44) differences >0.20. The biggest difference was on Reserved (Schizoid) and few differences on Excitable (Borderline). Implications for researchers interested in assessment and selection are discussed along with limitations of the study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current research in behavioral sciences
Current research in behavioral sciences Behavioral Neuroscience
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
40 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信