中国全球金融足迹2005-2014:AidData与CGIT比较

IF 1 4区经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS

Australian Economic Review Pub Date : 2022-05-03 DOI:10.1111/1467-8462.12469

Salma Ahmed, Bruce Rasmussen, Peter Sheehan

{"title":"中国全球金融足迹2005-2014:AidData与CGIT比较","authors":"Salma Ahmed, Bruce Rasmussen, Peter Sheehan","doi":"10.1111/1467-8462.12469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The growth of Chinese global official finance has stimulated great interest among foreign aid advocates. Yet, until now, a lack of systematic data reporting has limited our understanding of Chinese official finance. Against this background, this article describes and compares two internationally comparable Chinese datasets from 2005 to 2014: AidData and the China Global Investment Tracker (CGIT). This study summarises China's priority areas of investment and the actual volume of Chinese finance, including a breakdown of these estimates by region and sector. Despite significant disparities between the two databases, this study shows that Chinese investment preferences in terms of locality and priority sectors are broadly consistent with the existing pattern.</p>","PeriodicalId":46348,"journal":{"name":"Australian Economic Review","volume":"55 3","pages":"405-416"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1467-8462.12469","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"China's Global Finance Footprint 2005–2014: Comparing AidData and CGIT\",\"authors\":\"Salma Ahmed, Bruce Rasmussen, Peter Sheehan\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1467-8462.12469\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The growth of Chinese global official finance has stimulated great interest among foreign aid advocates. Yet, until now, a lack of systematic data reporting has limited our understanding of Chinese official finance. Against this background, this article describes and compares two internationally comparable Chinese datasets from 2005 to 2014: AidData and the China Global Investment Tracker (CGIT). This study summarises China's priority areas of investment and the actual volume of Chinese finance, including a breakdown of these estimates by region and sector. Despite significant disparities between the two databases, this study shows that Chinese investment preferences in terms of locality and priority sectors are broadly consistent with the existing pattern.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46348,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Economic Review\",\"volume\":\"55 3\",\"pages\":\"405-416\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1467-8462.12469\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Economic Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-8462.12469\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Economic Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-8462.12469","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

中国全球官方融资的增长激发了对外援助倡导者的极大兴趣。然而，到目前为止，由于缺乏系统的数据报告，限制了我们对中国官方财政的理解。在此背景下，本文描述并比较了2005年至2014年两个具有国际可比性的中国数据集:AidData和China Global Investment Tracker (CGIT)。本研究总结了中国的优先投资领域和中国融资的实际规模，包括按地区和行业分列的这些估计。尽管两个数据库之间存在显著差异，但本研究表明，中国在地方和优先行业方面的投资偏好与现有模式大致一致。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

China's Global Finance Footprint 2005–2014: Comparing AidData and CGIT

查看原文本刊更多论文

China's Global Finance Footprint 2005–2014: Comparing AidData and CGIT

The growth of Chinese global official finance has stimulated great interest among foreign aid advocates. Yet, until now, a lack of systematic data reporting has limited our understanding of Chinese official finance. Against this background, this article describes and compares two internationally comparable Chinese datasets from 2005 to 2014: AidData and the China Global Investment Tracker (CGIT). This study summarises China's priority areas of investment and the actual volume of Chinese finance, including a breakdown of these estimates by region and sector. Despite significant disparities between the two databases, this study shows that Chinese investment preferences in terms of locality and priority sectors are broadly consistent with the existing pattern.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Australian Economic Review ECONOMICS-

CiteScore

1.90

自引率

10.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： An applied economics journal with a strong policy orientation, The Australian Economic Review publishes high-quality articles applying economic analysis to a wide range of macroeconomic and microeconomic topics relevant to both economic and social policy issues. Produced by the Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, it is the leading journal of its kind in Australia and the Asia-Pacific region. While it is of special interest to Australian academics, students, policy makers, and others interested in the Australian economy, the journal also considers matters of international interest.