公证人在认证透视行为中的法律责任2014年第2号法律第65条关于公证部门

Elina Dyah Yulianti, Tunggul Anshari
{"title":"公证人在认证透视行为中的法律责任2014年第2号法律第65条关于公证部门","authors":"Elina Dyah Yulianti, Tunggul Anshari","doi":"10.17977/UM019V6I1P45-54","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to analyze the aspects of legal accountability as well as formulate legal aspects of legal protection for notaries in making an authentic deed on the perspective of Article 65 of Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning the Notarial Department (UUJN). This type of research was normative juridical research (normative legal research) that used a statue approach and conceptual approach. This study was analyzed by grammatical and systematic interpretation methods. The results showed that the notary was fully responsible in the making of the official deed (willingly), while in the making of the deed the notary party was not fully responsible when it had carried out its duties and obligations to properly include (compile) the information of the parties into the deed. Protection for notaries in making authentic deeds, namely preventive legal protection in the form of UUJN, as well as repressive protection in the form of the provisions of Article 66 UUJN as a form of settlement efforts if the notary is in question before the law.","PeriodicalId":31344,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pertanggungjawaban Hukum bagi Notaris dalam Membuat Akta Otentik Perspektif Pasal 65 Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 tentang Jabatan Notaris\",\"authors\":\"Elina Dyah Yulianti, Tunggul Anshari\",\"doi\":\"10.17977/UM019V6I1P45-54\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aimed to analyze the aspects of legal accountability as well as formulate legal aspects of legal protection for notaries in making an authentic deed on the perspective of Article 65 of Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning the Notarial Department (UUJN). This type of research was normative juridical research (normative legal research) that used a statue approach and conceptual approach. This study was analyzed by grammatical and systematic interpretation methods. The results showed that the notary was fully responsible in the making of the official deed (willingly), while in the making of the deed the notary party was not fully responsible when it had carried out its duties and obligations to properly include (compile) the information of the parties into the deed. Protection for notaries in making authentic deeds, namely preventive legal protection in the form of UUJN, as well as repressive protection in the form of the provisions of Article 66 UUJN as a form of settlement efforts if the notary is in question before the law.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31344,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17977/UM019V6I1P45-54\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17977/UM019V6I1P45-54","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究旨在从2014年第2号法(公证部)第65条的角度,分析公证员在制作真实契约中的法律责任方面,并制定公证员法律保护的法律方面。这种类型的研究是规范性法律研究(规范性法律研究),使用雕像方法和概念方法。本研究采用语法解释和系统解释两种方法进行分析。结果表明,公证员在公契的制作过程中(自愿)负有全部责任,而在公契的制作过程中,公证员在履行其职责和义务,将当事人的信息适当地包括(汇编)在公契中时,没有完全承担责任。对公证员作出真实证言之保护,即以联合担保形式之预防性法律保护,以及以联合担保第66条规定之压制性保护,作为解决公证员在法律上有问题之努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pertanggungjawaban Hukum bagi Notaris dalam Membuat Akta Otentik Perspektif Pasal 65 Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 tentang Jabatan Notaris
This study aimed to analyze the aspects of legal accountability as well as formulate legal aspects of legal protection for notaries in making an authentic deed on the perspective of Article 65 of Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning the Notarial Department (UUJN). This type of research was normative juridical research (normative legal research) that used a statue approach and conceptual approach. This study was analyzed by grammatical and systematic interpretation methods. The results showed that the notary was fully responsible in the making of the official deed (willingly), while in the making of the deed the notary party was not fully responsible when it had carried out its duties and obligations to properly include (compile) the information of the parties into the deed. Protection for notaries in making authentic deeds, namely preventive legal protection in the form of UUJN, as well as repressive protection in the form of the provisions of Article 66 UUJN as a form of settlement efforts if the notary is in question before the law.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信