数量和质量之间的权衡。大型爬行语料库与小型聚焦语料库在医学术语提取中的比较

IF 1 3区文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS

Across Languages and Cultures Pub Date : 2019-12-01 DOI:10.1556/084.2019.20.2.3

Veronique Hoste, Klaar Vanopstal, Ayla Rigouts Terryn, Els Lefever

{"title":"数量和质量之间的权衡。大型爬行语料库与小型聚焦语料库在医学术语提取中的比较","authors":"Veronique Hoste, Klaar Vanopstal, Ayla Rigouts Terryn, Els Lefever","doi":"10.1556/084.2019.20.2.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We investigate the cost-effectiveness of special-purpose crawled corpora versus more focused corpora for automatic terminology extraction (ATE). Our focus is on medical terminology on heart failure for two languages, viz. English for which we have more web and specialized resources at our disposal and the less resourced Dutch. We show that, although term density in the dedicated corpora is larger for both languages, the potential for term extraction is higher in the crawled corpora than in the dedicated corpora. Furthermore, in a set of experiments in which we evaluate both types of corpora, while keeping size constant, we observe that more Gold Standard (GS) terms are covered by the \"noisy\" crawled corpus than with a dedicated corpus of the same size.","PeriodicalId":44202,"journal":{"name":"Across Languages and Cultures","volume":"20 1","pages":"197-211"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1556/084.2019.20.2.3","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Trade-off between Quantity and Quality. Comparing a Large Crawled Corpus and a Small Focused Corpus for Medical Terminology Extraction\",\"authors\":\"Veronique Hoste, Klaar Vanopstal, Ayla Rigouts Terryn, Els Lefever\",\"doi\":\"10.1556/084.2019.20.2.3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We investigate the cost-effectiveness of special-purpose crawled corpora versus more focused corpora for automatic terminology extraction (ATE). Our focus is on medical terminology on heart failure for two languages, viz. English for which we have more web and specialized resources at our disposal and the less resourced Dutch. We show that, although term density in the dedicated corpora is larger for both languages, the potential for term extraction is higher in the crawled corpora than in the dedicated corpora. Furthermore, in a set of experiments in which we evaluate both types of corpora, while keeping size constant, we observe that more Gold Standard (GS) terms are covered by the \\\"noisy\\\" crawled corpus than with a dedicated corpus of the same size.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44202,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Across Languages and Cultures\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"197-211\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1556/084.2019.20.2.3\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Across Languages and Cultures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1556/084.2019.20.2.3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Across Languages and Cultures","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1556/084.2019.20.2.3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 4

摘要

我们研究了用于自动术语提取(ATE)的专用爬行语料库与更集中的语料库的成本效益。我们的重点是两种语言的心力衰竭医学术语，即英语，我们有更多的网络和专业资源可供我们使用，而资源较少的荷兰语。我们表明，尽管两种语言的专用语料库中的术语密度都更大，但爬行语料库中的术语提取潜力高于专用语料库。此外，在一组实验中，我们评估了两种类型的语料库，在保持大小不变的情况下，我们观察到“嘈杂的”爬行语料库比相同大小的专用语料库覆盖了更多的金标准(GS)术语。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The Trade-off between Quantity and Quality. Comparing a Large Crawled Corpus and a Small Focused Corpus for Medical Terminology Extraction

We investigate the cost-effectiveness of special-purpose crawled corpora versus more focused corpora for automatic terminology extraction (ATE). Our focus is on medical terminology on heart failure for two languages, viz. English for which we have more web and specialized resources at our disposal and the less resourced Dutch. We show that, although term density in the dedicated corpora is larger for both languages, the potential for term extraction is higher in the crawled corpora than in the dedicated corpora. Furthermore, in a set of experiments in which we evaluate both types of corpora, while keeping size constant, we observe that more Gold Standard (GS) terms are covered by the "noisy" crawled corpus than with a dedicated corpus of the same size.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Across Languages and Cultures Multiple-

CiteScore

1.70

自引率

14.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： Across Languages and Cultures publishes original articles and reviews on all sub-disciplines of Translation and Interpreting (T/I) Studies: general T/I theory, descriptive T/I studies and applied T/I studies. Special emphasis is laid on the questions of multilingualism, language policy and translation policy. Publications on new research methods and models are encouraged. Publishes book reviews, news, announcements and advertisements.