负责任的研究与实践创新:推动研究的“如何”和“什么”

Jiahong Chen , Elena Nichele , Zack Ellerby , Christian Wagner
{"title":"负责任的研究与实践创新:推动研究的“如何”和“什么”","authors":"Jiahong Chen ,&nbsp;Elena Nichele ,&nbsp;Zack Ellerby ,&nbsp;Christian Wagner","doi":"10.1016/j.jrt.2022.100042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>There have been ongoing discussions in research communities, including the field of trustworthy autonomous systems (TAS), on how researchers may meaningfully engage with responsible research and innovation (RRI). By critically reflecting on the RRI aspects of an ongoing research project focusing on the efficient capture of richer quantitative human response data (e.g., from consumer surveys), this paper offers a case study on how research development can be ethically driven. The role of RRI in the project is unpicked against the broader considerations of its possible interactions with researchers in a typology we developed: as a research <em>safeguard</em>, research <em>subject</em>, and research <em>driver</em>. Going beyond the more common practice of using RRI simply to safeguard <em>how</em> research should be conducted, it is demonstrated that it can also serve as a positive driving force to explore <em>what</em> should be researched. Experiences and challenges are elaborated within the main stages of research development, potentially applicable to a wider range of future projects in the field.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73937,"journal":{"name":"Journal of responsible technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666659622000191/pdfft?md5=105da519846b4b09a86041c4919855a0&pid=1-s2.0-S2666659622000191-main.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Responsible research and innovation in practice: Driving both the ‘How’ and the ‘What’ to research\",\"authors\":\"Jiahong Chen ,&nbsp;Elena Nichele ,&nbsp;Zack Ellerby ,&nbsp;Christian Wagner\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jrt.2022.100042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>There have been ongoing discussions in research communities, including the field of trustworthy autonomous systems (TAS), on how researchers may meaningfully engage with responsible research and innovation (RRI). By critically reflecting on the RRI aspects of an ongoing research project focusing on the efficient capture of richer quantitative human response data (e.g., from consumer surveys), this paper offers a case study on how research development can be ethically driven. The role of RRI in the project is unpicked against the broader considerations of its possible interactions with researchers in a typology we developed: as a research <em>safeguard</em>, research <em>subject</em>, and research <em>driver</em>. Going beyond the more common practice of using RRI simply to safeguard <em>how</em> research should be conducted, it is demonstrated that it can also serve as a positive driving force to explore <em>what</em> should be researched. Experiences and challenges are elaborated within the main stages of research development, potentially applicable to a wider range of future projects in the field.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73937,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of responsible technology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666659622000191/pdfft?md5=105da519846b4b09a86041c4919855a0&pid=1-s2.0-S2666659622000191-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of responsible technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666659622000191\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of responsible technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666659622000191","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在研究界,包括可信自治系统(TAS)领域,一直在讨论研究人员如何有意义地参与负责任的研究和创新(RRI)。通过批判性地反思一个正在进行的研究项目的RRI方面,该项目专注于有效捕获更丰富的定量人类反应数据(例如,来自消费者调查),本文提供了一个关于研究发展如何受到伦理驱动的案例研究。RRI在项目中的作用与我们开发的类型学中与研究人员可能的相互作用的更广泛考虑相分离:作为研究保障,研究主体和研究驱动者。超越了使用RRI仅仅是为了保障研究应该如何进行的更常见的做法,它证明了它也可以作为探索应该研究什么的积极推动力。在研究发展的主要阶段阐述了经验和挑战,可能适用于该领域更广泛的未来项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Responsible research and innovation in practice: Driving both the ‘How’ and the ‘What’ to research

There have been ongoing discussions in research communities, including the field of trustworthy autonomous systems (TAS), on how researchers may meaningfully engage with responsible research and innovation (RRI). By critically reflecting on the RRI aspects of an ongoing research project focusing on the efficient capture of richer quantitative human response data (e.g., from consumer surveys), this paper offers a case study on how research development can be ethically driven. The role of RRI in the project is unpicked against the broader considerations of its possible interactions with researchers in a typology we developed: as a research safeguard, research subject, and research driver. Going beyond the more common practice of using RRI simply to safeguard how research should be conducted, it is demonstrated that it can also serve as a positive driving force to explore what should be researched. Experiences and challenges are elaborated within the main stages of research development, potentially applicable to a wider range of future projects in the field.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of responsible technology
Journal of responsible technology Information Systems, Artificial Intelligence, Human-Computer Interaction
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
168 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信