拥抱酒店和旅游行业客户体验的悖论

IF 7.5 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Dongmei Zha, Reza Marvi, Pantea Foroudi
{"title":"拥抱酒店和旅游行业客户体验的悖论","authors":"Dongmei Zha,&nbsp;Reza Marvi,&nbsp;Pantea Foroudi","doi":"10.1111/ijmr.12343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper aims to re-evaluate the customer experience literature in the hospitality and tourism (H&amp;T) domain by employing a paradox lens and constructing a model for future research direction and practitioners. Using two co-citation analysis methods—a hierarchical cluster analysis and a multidimensional scaling analysis—to investigate 312 customer experience papers from the leading H&amp;T journals with 22.124 citations over the 44-year period (1987–2021), we identified five knowledge foundations that have made up the intellectual structure of customer experience in H&amp;T: experiential consumption, authenticity, memorability, place branding, and service. This result reveals the dualistic representations of the paradoxical character of customer experience including authentic/fantastical, structured/unstructured, branded/ecological, and bubbled/exposed. Based on this finding, this study developed a framework for scholars and marketers to reveal different approaches to managing the tensions between paradoxes.</p>","PeriodicalId":48326,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Management Reviews","volume":"26 2","pages":"163-186"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ijmr.12343","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Embracing the paradox of customer experiences in the hospitality and tourism industry\",\"authors\":\"Dongmei Zha,&nbsp;Reza Marvi,&nbsp;Pantea Foroudi\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ijmr.12343\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This paper aims to re-evaluate the customer experience literature in the hospitality and tourism (H&amp;T) domain by employing a paradox lens and constructing a model for future research direction and practitioners. Using two co-citation analysis methods—a hierarchical cluster analysis and a multidimensional scaling analysis—to investigate 312 customer experience papers from the leading H&amp;T journals with 22.124 citations over the 44-year period (1987–2021), we identified five knowledge foundations that have made up the intellectual structure of customer experience in H&amp;T: experiential consumption, authenticity, memorability, place branding, and service. This result reveals the dualistic representations of the paradoxical character of customer experience including authentic/fantastical, structured/unstructured, branded/ecological, and bubbled/exposed. Based on this finding, this study developed a framework for scholars and marketers to reveal different approaches to managing the tensions between paradoxes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48326,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Management Reviews\",\"volume\":\"26 2\",\"pages\":\"163-186\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ijmr.12343\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Management Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijmr.12343\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Management Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijmr.12343","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在运用悖论视角重新评估酒店与旅游(H&T)领域的客户体验文献,并为未来的研究方向和从业人员构建一个模型。我们使用了两种共引分析方法--分层聚类分析和多维标度分析--对 44 年间(1987-2021 年)312 篇来自主要酒店与旅游期刊的顾客体验论文(共 22124 次引用)进行了研究,发现了构成酒店与旅游领域顾客体验知识结构的五个知识基础:体验式消费、真实性、可记忆性、场所品牌和服务。这一结果揭示了顾客体验矛盾特征的二元表征,包括真实性/幻想性、结构化/非结构化、品牌化/生态化和泡沫化/暴露化。基于这一发现,本研究为学者和营销人员制定了一个框架,以揭示管理悖论之间紧张关系的不同方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Embracing the paradox of customer experiences in the hospitality and tourism industry

Embracing the paradox of customer experiences in the hospitality and tourism industry

This paper aims to re-evaluate the customer experience literature in the hospitality and tourism (H&T) domain by employing a paradox lens and constructing a model for future research direction and practitioners. Using two co-citation analysis methods—a hierarchical cluster analysis and a multidimensional scaling analysis—to investigate 312 customer experience papers from the leading H&T journals with 22.124 citations over the 44-year period (1987–2021), we identified five knowledge foundations that have made up the intellectual structure of customer experience in H&T: experiential consumption, authenticity, memorability, place branding, and service. This result reveals the dualistic representations of the paradoxical character of customer experience including authentic/fantastical, structured/unstructured, branded/ecological, and bubbled/exposed. Based on this finding, this study developed a framework for scholars and marketers to reveal different approaches to managing the tensions between paradoxes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Management Reviews (IJMR) stands as the premier global review journal in Organisation and Management Studies (OMS). Its published papers aim to provide substantial conceptual contributions, acting as a strategic platform for new research directions. IJMR plays a pivotal role in influencing how OMS scholars conceptualize research in their respective fields. The journal's reviews critically assess the state of knowledge in specific fields, appraising the conceptual foundations of competing paradigms to advance current and future research in the area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信