加州甜瓜生产中杂草控制和作物安全的除草剂筛选

IF 1.3 3区 农林科学 Q3 AGRONOMY
T. Bean, S. Stoddard, L. Sosnoskie, A. Osipitan, P. Devkota, Guy B. Kyser, B. Hanson
{"title":"加州甜瓜生产中杂草控制和作物安全的除草剂筛选","authors":"T. Bean, S. Stoddard, L. Sosnoskie, A. Osipitan, P. Devkota, Guy B. Kyser, B. Hanson","doi":"10.1017/wet.2023.30","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Weed management in cantaloupe and other melon crops is important to maximize fruit yield; however, there are few registered herbicides available in California. Several independent herbicide trials were conducted at University of California field stations in Davis (Yolo County), Five Points (Fresno County), and Holtville (Imperial County) from 2013 to 2019 to evaluate both registered and unregistered herbicides and incorporation methods (sprinklers, cultivation, or none) for crop safety and weed control in melons. Although specific treatments varied among locations depending on local practice and research objectives, ethalfluralin and halosulfuron were used in all experiments, and bensulide and S-metolachlor were evaluated in 4 of 6 site-years. Additional herbicides included clethodim, clomazone, DCPA, napropamide, pendimethalin, sethoxydim, and sulfentrazone. Among registered herbicides, halosulfuron, halosulfuron + ethalfluralin, and ethalfluralin + bensulide combinations provided consistently beneficial weed control across all site-years compared to the nontreated control. S-metolachlor performed as well as the best of the registered herbicides tested at each site-year; although moderate injury was noted at the Davis location, this did not reduce melon yield. The method used to incorporate preplant herbicides had a significant impact on weed control efficacy but varied by location. Mechanical incorporation of preplant herbicides resulted in improved weed control and yield compared to sprinklers. Early-season weed control, whether by herbicides or hand weeding, resulted in significant yield increase in most site-years. Nomenclature: Bensulide; clethodim; clomazone; DCPA; ethalfluralin; halosulfuron; napropamide; pendimethalin; S-metolachlor; sethoxydim; sulfentrazone; cantaloupe, Cucumis melo L.","PeriodicalId":23710,"journal":{"name":"Weed Technology","volume":"37 1","pages":"259 - 266"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Herbicide screening for weed control and crop safety in California melon production\",\"authors\":\"T. Bean, S. Stoddard, L. Sosnoskie, A. Osipitan, P. Devkota, Guy B. Kyser, B. Hanson\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/wet.2023.30\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Weed management in cantaloupe and other melon crops is important to maximize fruit yield; however, there are few registered herbicides available in California. Several independent herbicide trials were conducted at University of California field stations in Davis (Yolo County), Five Points (Fresno County), and Holtville (Imperial County) from 2013 to 2019 to evaluate both registered and unregistered herbicides and incorporation methods (sprinklers, cultivation, or none) for crop safety and weed control in melons. Although specific treatments varied among locations depending on local practice and research objectives, ethalfluralin and halosulfuron were used in all experiments, and bensulide and S-metolachlor were evaluated in 4 of 6 site-years. Additional herbicides included clethodim, clomazone, DCPA, napropamide, pendimethalin, sethoxydim, and sulfentrazone. Among registered herbicides, halosulfuron, halosulfuron + ethalfluralin, and ethalfluralin + bensulide combinations provided consistently beneficial weed control across all site-years compared to the nontreated control. S-metolachlor performed as well as the best of the registered herbicides tested at each site-year; although moderate injury was noted at the Davis location, this did not reduce melon yield. The method used to incorporate preplant herbicides had a significant impact on weed control efficacy but varied by location. Mechanical incorporation of preplant herbicides resulted in improved weed control and yield compared to sprinklers. Early-season weed control, whether by herbicides or hand weeding, resulted in significant yield increase in most site-years. Nomenclature: Bensulide; clethodim; clomazone; DCPA; ethalfluralin; halosulfuron; napropamide; pendimethalin; S-metolachlor; sethoxydim; sulfentrazone; cantaloupe, Cucumis melo L.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23710,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Weed Technology\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"259 - 266\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Weed Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2023.30\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Weed Technology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2023.30","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

哈密瓜和其他甜瓜作物的杂草管理是实现果实产量最大化的重要措施;然而,在加州很少有注册的除草剂可用。2013年至2019年,在加州大学戴维斯(约洛县)、五点(弗雷斯诺县)和霍尔特维尔(因皮因县)的田间站进行了几项独立的除草剂试验,以评估已注册和未注册的除草剂及其添加方法(洒水、种植或不使用)对瓜类作物安全和杂草控制的影响。虽然根据当地的实践和研究目标,不同地点的具体处理方法有所不同,但所有实验都使用了乙氟灵和卤代磺隆,并在6个站点年中的4个站点年评估了苯磺利酯和s -甲草胺。其他除草剂包括氯噻酮、氯马唑酮、DCPA、萘丙胺、苯二甲基灵、乙氧啶和磺胺曲酮。在已登记的除草剂中,与未处理的对照相比,卤磺隆、卤磺隆+氟乙烷和氟乙烷+苯磺脲组合在所有现场年都具有一致的有益杂草控制效果。s -甲草胺在每个站点年的测试中表现最好;虽然在戴维斯地区发现了中度损伤,但这并未降低甜瓜产量。种植前施用除草剂对杂草防治效果有显著影响,但因地而异。与洒水器相比,种植前机械加入除草剂改善了杂草控制和产量。在大多数立地年,无论是除草剂还是手工除草,早季杂草控制都能显著提高产量。术语:Bensulide;clethodim;clomazone;DCPA;ethalfluralin;halosulfuron;敌草胺;pendimethalin;S-metolachlor;sethoxydim;sulfentrazone;哈密瓜,黄瓜甜瓜。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Herbicide screening for weed control and crop safety in California melon production
Abstract Weed management in cantaloupe and other melon crops is important to maximize fruit yield; however, there are few registered herbicides available in California. Several independent herbicide trials were conducted at University of California field stations in Davis (Yolo County), Five Points (Fresno County), and Holtville (Imperial County) from 2013 to 2019 to evaluate both registered and unregistered herbicides and incorporation methods (sprinklers, cultivation, or none) for crop safety and weed control in melons. Although specific treatments varied among locations depending on local practice and research objectives, ethalfluralin and halosulfuron were used in all experiments, and bensulide and S-metolachlor were evaluated in 4 of 6 site-years. Additional herbicides included clethodim, clomazone, DCPA, napropamide, pendimethalin, sethoxydim, and sulfentrazone. Among registered herbicides, halosulfuron, halosulfuron + ethalfluralin, and ethalfluralin + bensulide combinations provided consistently beneficial weed control across all site-years compared to the nontreated control. S-metolachlor performed as well as the best of the registered herbicides tested at each site-year; although moderate injury was noted at the Davis location, this did not reduce melon yield. The method used to incorporate preplant herbicides had a significant impact on weed control efficacy but varied by location. Mechanical incorporation of preplant herbicides resulted in improved weed control and yield compared to sprinklers. Early-season weed control, whether by herbicides or hand weeding, resulted in significant yield increase in most site-years. Nomenclature: Bensulide; clethodim; clomazone; DCPA; ethalfluralin; halosulfuron; napropamide; pendimethalin; S-metolachlor; sethoxydim; sulfentrazone; cantaloupe, Cucumis melo L.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Weed Technology
Weed Technology 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
21.40%
发文量
89
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: Weed Technology publishes original research and scholarship in the form of peer-reviewed articles focused on understanding how weeds are managed. The journal focuses on: - Applied aspects concerning the management of weeds in agricultural systems - Herbicides used to manage undesired vegetation, weed biology and control - Weed/crop management systems - Reports of new weed problems -New technologies for weed management and special articles emphasizing technology transfer to improve weed control -Articles dealing with plant growth regulators and management of undesired plant growth may also be accepted, provided there is clear relevance to weed science technology, e.g., turfgrass or woody plant management along rights-of-way, vegetation management in forest, aquatic, or other non-crop situations. -Surveys, education, and extension topics related to weeds will also be considered
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信