政治权力与“自然法则”。重男轻女与奴隶制

IF 0.1 Q4 ECONOMICS
Simona Pisanelli
{"title":"政治权力与“自然法则”。重男轻女与奴隶制","authors":"Simona Pisanelli","doi":"10.3280/SPE2017-001003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As we know, there are two basic elements in the Physiocrats’ view: on the juridical plane, the belief that positive laws follow natural ones; on the economic plane, the idea that agriculture is the sole source of net product. The importance and interdependence of these two aspects also emerge with reference to the issue of slave labour and to the debate concerning its abolition. This article attempts to inquire into the ambiguities of the economic ideas of the Physiocrats, who, in theory, favored the use of free labour, but in practice were forced, out of political realism, to accept slave labor - even though it was seen as the outcome of a \"sick\" law. In particular, we will show that Le Mercier de la Riviere and Pierre Poivre, Physiocrats and colonial Intendants, gave up to the idea of the abolition of slavery, thus legitimising its continuation.","PeriodicalId":40401,"journal":{"name":"History of Economic Thought and Policy","volume":"1 1","pages":"67-85"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Political power vs \\\"natural laws\\\". Physiocracy and slavery\",\"authors\":\"Simona Pisanelli\",\"doi\":\"10.3280/SPE2017-001003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As we know, there are two basic elements in the Physiocrats’ view: on the juridical plane, the belief that positive laws follow natural ones; on the economic plane, the idea that agriculture is the sole source of net product. The importance and interdependence of these two aspects also emerge with reference to the issue of slave labour and to the debate concerning its abolition. This article attempts to inquire into the ambiguities of the economic ideas of the Physiocrats, who, in theory, favored the use of free labour, but in practice were forced, out of political realism, to accept slave labor - even though it was seen as the outcome of a \\\"sick\\\" law. In particular, we will show that Le Mercier de la Riviere and Pierre Poivre, Physiocrats and colonial Intendants, gave up to the idea of the abolition of slavery, thus legitimising its continuation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40401,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"History of Economic Thought and Policy\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"67-85\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"History of Economic Thought and Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3280/SPE2017-001003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History of Economic Thought and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3280/SPE2017-001003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

正如我们所知,生理学家的观点有两个基本要素:在法律层面上,相信积极的法律遵循自然的法律;在经济层面上,农业是净产品的唯一来源。这两个方面的重要性和相互依存性也体现在奴隶劳动问题和关于废除奴隶劳动的辩论中。本文试图探究自然人经济思想的模糊性,他们在理论上支持使用自由劳动,但在实践中,出于政治现实主义,被迫接受奴隶劳动——尽管这被视为“病态”法律的结果。特别是,我们将表明,Le Mercier de la Riviere和Pierre Poivre,Physiocrats和殖民统治者,放弃了废除奴隶制的想法,从而使奴隶制的延续合法化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Political power vs "natural laws". Physiocracy and slavery
As we know, there are two basic elements in the Physiocrats’ view: on the juridical plane, the belief that positive laws follow natural ones; on the economic plane, the idea that agriculture is the sole source of net product. The importance and interdependence of these two aspects also emerge with reference to the issue of slave labour and to the debate concerning its abolition. This article attempts to inquire into the ambiguities of the economic ideas of the Physiocrats, who, in theory, favored the use of free labour, but in practice were forced, out of political realism, to accept slave labor - even though it was seen as the outcome of a "sick" law. In particular, we will show that Le Mercier de la Riviere and Pierre Poivre, Physiocrats and colonial Intendants, gave up to the idea of the abolition of slavery, thus legitimising its continuation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信