疫苗接种态度检查量表与疫苗接种依从性

IF 0.4 4区 医学 Q4 Medicine
C. Precup, V. Toma, I. Toma, T. Olariu, I. Olariu, D. Negru, M. Sándor, M. Moț, C. Stoian, L. Bran
{"title":"疫苗接种态度检查量表与疫苗接种依从性","authors":"C. Precup, V. Toma, I. Toma, T. Olariu, I. Olariu, D. Negru, M. Sándor, M. Moț, C. Stoian, L. Bran","doi":"10.4323/rjlm.2021.387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. SARS_CoV_2 pandemic triggered international measures, from genomic sequencing, PCR tests and accelerated studies for vaccines and treatments approval, to extreme restriction of civil rights, through stringent measures as social distance, work and online education etc. The lack of population??s adherence to the authorities?? measures can compromise the success in limiting the pandemic. Material and method. This cross-sectional study identified the opinions of vaccinated and unvaccinated participants regarding the severity of the pandemic, vaccination and stringency measures, the objective being to highlight the ethical and moral aspects on which these opinions are based. The responders (n = 412) declared their vaccinal status in a questionnaire, their opinions on disease, on the vaccine, their attitude towards the green certificate etc. The data analysis followed the internal consistency of the questionnaire through Cronbach???s alpha, correlations, inferential tests. Results. Respondents are not worried about getting sick at work but are concerned about their families and friends safety;are not convinced of the quality of approved vaccines (for which regulators cannot guarantee the safety);are concerned about the lack of transparency in pharmacovigilance and vaccine efficacy studies;they think that vaccines do not stop the viruses transmission, do not provide lasting protection or eradicate the virus. They consider that both the virus and human immune response are insufficiently known and the green certificate does not limit the burden of disease, being discriminatory. Conclusions. For the quality of life, already compromised in the pandemic, the absence of restrictions and voluntary vaccination are important.","PeriodicalId":54450,"journal":{"name":"Romanian Journal of Legal Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vaccination Attitudes Examination Scale and Adherence to Vaccination\",\"authors\":\"C. Precup, V. Toma, I. Toma, T. Olariu, I. Olariu, D. Negru, M. Sándor, M. Moț, C. Stoian, L. Bran\",\"doi\":\"10.4323/rjlm.2021.387\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction. SARS_CoV_2 pandemic triggered international measures, from genomic sequencing, PCR tests and accelerated studies for vaccines and treatments approval, to extreme restriction of civil rights, through stringent measures as social distance, work and online education etc. The lack of population??s adherence to the authorities?? measures can compromise the success in limiting the pandemic. Material and method. This cross-sectional study identified the opinions of vaccinated and unvaccinated participants regarding the severity of the pandemic, vaccination and stringency measures, the objective being to highlight the ethical and moral aspects on which these opinions are based. The responders (n = 412) declared their vaccinal status in a questionnaire, their opinions on disease, on the vaccine, their attitude towards the green certificate etc. The data analysis followed the internal consistency of the questionnaire through Cronbach???s alpha, correlations, inferential tests. Results. Respondents are not worried about getting sick at work but are concerned about their families and friends safety;are not convinced of the quality of approved vaccines (for which regulators cannot guarantee the safety);are concerned about the lack of transparency in pharmacovigilance and vaccine efficacy studies;they think that vaccines do not stop the viruses transmission, do not provide lasting protection or eradicate the virus. They consider that both the virus and human immune response are insufficiently known and the green certificate does not limit the burden of disease, being discriminatory. Conclusions. For the quality of life, already compromised in the pandemic, the absence of restrictions and voluntary vaccination are important.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54450,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Romanian Journal of Legal Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Romanian Journal of Legal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4323/rjlm.2021.387\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Romanian Journal of Legal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4323/rjlm.2021.387","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

介绍。国际社会纷纷采取措施,从基因组测序、PCR检测、加快疫苗和治疗方案审批研究,到极端限制公民权利,采取社交距离、工作、在线教育等严格措施。人口稀少??美国对当局的忠诚??一些措施可能会影响限制大流行的成功。材料和方法。这项横断面研究确定了接种疫苗和未接种疫苗的参与者对大流行的严重程度、疫苗接种和严格措施的意见,目的是突出这些意见所依据的伦理和道德方面。应答者(n = 412)在问卷中声明了他们的疫苗接种状况、他们对疾病、疫苗的看法、他们对绿色证书的态度等。数据分析遵循问卷内部一致性通过Cronbach??S alpha,相关性,推理检验。结果。受访者不担心在工作中生病,但担心家人和朋友的安全;不相信已批准疫苗的质量(监管机构无法保证其安全性);担心药物警惕和疫苗功效研究缺乏透明度;他们认为疫苗不能阻止病毒传播,不能提供持久保护或根除病毒。他们认为,对病毒和人体免疫反应的了解都不够充分,绿色证书没有限制疾病负担,具有歧视性。结论。对于已经在大流行中受到损害的生活质量来说,没有限制和自愿接种疫苗是重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Vaccination Attitudes Examination Scale and Adherence to Vaccination
Introduction. SARS_CoV_2 pandemic triggered international measures, from genomic sequencing, PCR tests and accelerated studies for vaccines and treatments approval, to extreme restriction of civil rights, through stringent measures as social distance, work and online education etc. The lack of population??s adherence to the authorities?? measures can compromise the success in limiting the pandemic. Material and method. This cross-sectional study identified the opinions of vaccinated and unvaccinated participants regarding the severity of the pandemic, vaccination and stringency measures, the objective being to highlight the ethical and moral aspects on which these opinions are based. The responders (n = 412) declared their vaccinal status in a questionnaire, their opinions on disease, on the vaccine, their attitude towards the green certificate etc. The data analysis followed the internal consistency of the questionnaire through Cronbach???s alpha, correlations, inferential tests. Results. Respondents are not worried about getting sick at work but are concerned about their families and friends safety;are not convinced of the quality of approved vaccines (for which regulators cannot guarantee the safety);are concerned about the lack of transparency in pharmacovigilance and vaccine efficacy studies;they think that vaccines do not stop the viruses transmission, do not provide lasting protection or eradicate the virus. They consider that both the virus and human immune response are insufficiently known and the green certificate does not limit the burden of disease, being discriminatory. Conclusions. For the quality of life, already compromised in the pandemic, the absence of restrictions and voluntary vaccination are important.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
25.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Romanian Journal of Legal Medicine, the official publication of the Romanian Legal Medicine Society, is devoted to the publication of the original investigations, observations, scholarly inquiries and reviews in the various branches of the forensic sciences. These include forensic pathology and histochemistry, clinical forensic medicine, medical malpractice, traffic medicine, chemistry, biochemistry, thanatochemistry, clinical and forensic toxicology, alcohology, biology (including the identification of hairs and fibres), the physical sciences, firearms, and document examination, physical anthropology, serology, forensic genetics and paternity (with special emphasis on recent advances in DNA technology and PCR), forensic psychiatry and behavioral sciences, forensic odontology, law and ethics, history of forensic sciences. RJLM also includes similar submissions dealing with forensic-oriented aspects of the social science and the area where science and medicine interact with the law.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信