倡导的绳索:关键的种族方法作为美国人口普查中恐惧和信任之间非营利性调解的镜头

Q1 Social Sciences
Maureen Emerson Feit, Jack Brandon Philips, Taylor Coats
{"title":"倡导的绳索:关键的种族方法作为美国人口普查中恐惧和信任之间非营利性调解的镜头","authors":"Maureen Emerson Feit, Jack Brandon Philips, Taylor Coats","doi":"10.1080/10841806.2021.1944586","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In this study of nonprofit engagement with the census, we argue for an expansion of the research toolbox to include critical race methods as an essential lens on public and nonprofit administration. By foregrounding race and racism, illuminating power structures and discourses, and centering the knowledge and practices of nonprofit staff as street-level workers, critical race methods reveal the processes of construction that shape and influence a seemingly objective count and highlight the roles that staff play as mediators in the conflicts between fear and trust that are inherent to racial governance in the United States.","PeriodicalId":37205,"journal":{"name":"Administrative Theory and Praxis","volume":"44 1","pages":"23 - 45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10841806.2021.1944586","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tightrope of advocacy: Critical race methods as a lens on nonprofit mediation between fear and trust in the U.S. Census\",\"authors\":\"Maureen Emerson Feit, Jack Brandon Philips, Taylor Coats\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10841806.2021.1944586\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract In this study of nonprofit engagement with the census, we argue for an expansion of the research toolbox to include critical race methods as an essential lens on public and nonprofit administration. By foregrounding race and racism, illuminating power structures and discourses, and centering the knowledge and practices of nonprofit staff as street-level workers, critical race methods reveal the processes of construction that shape and influence a seemingly objective count and highlight the roles that staff play as mediators in the conflicts between fear and trust that are inherent to racial governance in the United States.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37205,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Administrative Theory and Praxis\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"23 - 45\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10841806.2021.1944586\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Administrative Theory and Praxis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2021.1944586\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Administrative Theory and Praxis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2021.1944586","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

摘要在这项关于非营利组织参与人口普查的研究中,我们主张扩大研究工具箱,将批判性种族方法纳入公共和非营利管理的重要视角。通过突出种族和种族主义,阐明权力结构和话语,并以非营利工作人员作为街头工作者的知识和实践为中心,批判性种族方法揭示了塑造和影响看似客观的计数的构建过程,并强调了工作人员在美国种族治理所固有的恐惧与信任之间的冲突中作为调解人所扮演的角色。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tightrope of advocacy: Critical race methods as a lens on nonprofit mediation between fear and trust in the U.S. Census
Abstract In this study of nonprofit engagement with the census, we argue for an expansion of the research toolbox to include critical race methods as an essential lens on public and nonprofit administration. By foregrounding race and racism, illuminating power structures and discourses, and centering the knowledge and practices of nonprofit staff as street-level workers, critical race methods reveal the processes of construction that shape and influence a seemingly objective count and highlight the roles that staff play as mediators in the conflicts between fear and trust that are inherent to racial governance in the United States.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Administrative Theory and Praxis
Administrative Theory and Praxis Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信