评估老年人过渡性护理计划:混合方法研究定量阶段的结果

IF 0.8 Q4 GERONTOLOGY
Wilma van der Vlegel-Brouwer, Marjolein van der Vlegel, J. Duckworth, H. Partington, A. de Jong
{"title":"评估老年人过渡性护理计划:混合方法研究定量阶段的结果","authors":"Wilma van der Vlegel-Brouwer, Marjolein van der Vlegel, J. Duckworth, H. Partington, A. de Jong","doi":"10.1108/qaoa-03-2022-0018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis quantitative phase of a mixed-methods study aims to describe the effect of the Transitional Care Bridge (TCB) programme on functional decline, mortality, health-care utilisation and health outcomes compared to usual care in a regional hospital in the Netherlands.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nIn a pre- and post-cohort study, patients aged ≥70 years, admitted to the hospital for ≥48 h and discharged home with an Identification of Seniors at Risk score of ≥2, were included. The TCB programme, started before discharge, encompassed six visits by the community nurse (CN). Data were obtained from the hospital registry and by three questionnaires over a three months period, addressing activities of daily living (ADL), self-rated health, self-rated quality of life and health-care utilisation.\n\n\nFindings\nIn total, 100 patients were enrolled in this study, 50 patients in the TCB group and 50 patients in the usual care group. After three months, 36.7% was dependent on ADL in the TCB group compared to 47.1% in the usual care group. Mean number of visits by the CN in the TCB group was 3.8. Although the TCB group had a lower mortality, this study did not find any statistically significant differences in health outcomes and health-care utilisation.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nChallenges in the delivery of the programme may have influenced patient outcomes. More research is needed on implementation of evidence-based programmes in smaller research settings. A qualitative phase of the study needs to address these outcomes and explore the perspectives of health professionals and patients on the delivery of the programme.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis study provides valuable information on the transitional care programme in a smaller setting.\n","PeriodicalId":44916,"journal":{"name":"Quality in Ageing and Older Adults","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating a transitional care program for the oldest adults: results from the quantitative phase of a mixed-methods study\",\"authors\":\"Wilma van der Vlegel-Brouwer, Marjolein van der Vlegel, J. Duckworth, H. Partington, A. de Jong\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/qaoa-03-2022-0018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThis quantitative phase of a mixed-methods study aims to describe the effect of the Transitional Care Bridge (TCB) programme on functional decline, mortality, health-care utilisation and health outcomes compared to usual care in a regional hospital in the Netherlands.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nIn a pre- and post-cohort study, patients aged ≥70 years, admitted to the hospital for ≥48 h and discharged home with an Identification of Seniors at Risk score of ≥2, were included. The TCB programme, started before discharge, encompassed six visits by the community nurse (CN). Data were obtained from the hospital registry and by three questionnaires over a three months period, addressing activities of daily living (ADL), self-rated health, self-rated quality of life and health-care utilisation.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nIn total, 100 patients were enrolled in this study, 50 patients in the TCB group and 50 patients in the usual care group. After three months, 36.7% was dependent on ADL in the TCB group compared to 47.1% in the usual care group. Mean number of visits by the CN in the TCB group was 3.8. Although the TCB group had a lower mortality, this study did not find any statistically significant differences in health outcomes and health-care utilisation.\\n\\n\\nResearch limitations/implications\\nChallenges in the delivery of the programme may have influenced patient outcomes. More research is needed on implementation of evidence-based programmes in smaller research settings. A qualitative phase of the study needs to address these outcomes and explore the perspectives of health professionals and patients on the delivery of the programme.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThis study provides valuable information on the transitional care programme in a smaller setting.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":44916,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quality in Ageing and Older Adults\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quality in Ageing and Older Adults\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/qaoa-03-2022-0018\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality in Ageing and Older Adults","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/qaoa-03-2022-0018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的这项混合方法研究的定量阶段旨在描述与荷兰地区医院的常规护理相比,过渡期护理桥(TCB)计划对功能下降、死亡率、医疗保健利用率和健康结果的影响。设计/方法/方法在队列前后研究中,年龄≥70岁的患者,入院时间≥48小时并出院且老年人风险识别评分≥2的患者。出院前开始的TCB计划包括社区护士(CN)的六次探访。数据来自医院登记处,并在三个月内通过三份问卷获得,涉及日常生活活动(ADL)、自评健康、自评生活质量和医疗保健利用率。结果本研究共有100名患者入选,TCB组有50名患者,常规护理组有50例患者。三个月后,TCB组36.7%依赖ADL,而常规护理组为47.1%。TCB组CN的平均就诊次数为3.8次。尽管TCB组的死亡率较低,但本研究并未发现健康结果和医疗保健利用率存在任何统计学上的显著差异。研究局限性/影响项目实施中的挑战可能影响了患者的结果。需要对在较小的研究环境中实施循证方案进行更多的研究。研究的定性阶段需要解决这些结果,并探讨卫生专业人员和患者对该计划实施的看法。独创性/价值这项研究提供了关于较小环境下过渡期护理计划的宝贵信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating a transitional care program for the oldest adults: results from the quantitative phase of a mixed-methods study
Purpose This quantitative phase of a mixed-methods study aims to describe the effect of the Transitional Care Bridge (TCB) programme on functional decline, mortality, health-care utilisation and health outcomes compared to usual care in a regional hospital in the Netherlands. Design/methodology/approach In a pre- and post-cohort study, patients aged ≥70 years, admitted to the hospital for ≥48 h and discharged home with an Identification of Seniors at Risk score of ≥2, were included. The TCB programme, started before discharge, encompassed six visits by the community nurse (CN). Data were obtained from the hospital registry and by three questionnaires over a three months period, addressing activities of daily living (ADL), self-rated health, self-rated quality of life and health-care utilisation. Findings In total, 100 patients were enrolled in this study, 50 patients in the TCB group and 50 patients in the usual care group. After three months, 36.7% was dependent on ADL in the TCB group compared to 47.1% in the usual care group. Mean number of visits by the CN in the TCB group was 3.8. Although the TCB group had a lower mortality, this study did not find any statistically significant differences in health outcomes and health-care utilisation. Research limitations/implications Challenges in the delivery of the programme may have influenced patient outcomes. More research is needed on implementation of evidence-based programmes in smaller research settings. A qualitative phase of the study needs to address these outcomes and explore the perspectives of health professionals and patients on the delivery of the programme. Originality/value This study provides valuable information on the transitional care programme in a smaller setting.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
6.70%
发文量
17
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信