归因Gleanings

Q3 Arts and Humanities
D. Ostrowski
{"title":"归因Gleanings","authors":"D. Ostrowski","doi":"10.30965/22102396-05703011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Those engaged in scholarly work might benefit from getting out of their silos of research from time to time and become familiar with parallel research in other areas of study. Very little of historical study involves 100 % certainty; it mostly involves degrees of possibility and probability. Finding out how scholars in other fields deal with similar problems can help us adjust the possibility/probability calibrations in our own field. For example, one can apply standards to determine degrees of certainty to works attributed to Nil Sorskii. One can then apply those standards to the works of other mid-second millennium authors. Meanwhile, the three criteria of historical study can beneficially be applied to questions of authorship, such as the controversies surrounding the attributions to William Shakespeare and to Andrei Kurbskii. No matter how frustrated one might get with one’s opponents, one needs to remember that ad hominem denigration does not advance the cause of scholarship.","PeriodicalId":35067,"journal":{"name":"Canadian-American Slavic Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Attribution Gleanings\",\"authors\":\"D. Ostrowski\",\"doi\":\"10.30965/22102396-05703011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Those engaged in scholarly work might benefit from getting out of their silos of research from time to time and become familiar with parallel research in other areas of study. Very little of historical study involves 100 % certainty; it mostly involves degrees of possibility and probability. Finding out how scholars in other fields deal with similar problems can help us adjust the possibility/probability calibrations in our own field. For example, one can apply standards to determine degrees of certainty to works attributed to Nil Sorskii. One can then apply those standards to the works of other mid-second millennium authors. Meanwhile, the three criteria of historical study can beneficially be applied to questions of authorship, such as the controversies surrounding the attributions to William Shakespeare and to Andrei Kurbskii. No matter how frustrated one might get with one’s opponents, one needs to remember that ad hominem denigration does not advance the cause of scholarship.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35067,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian-American Slavic Studies\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian-American Slavic Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30965/22102396-05703011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian-American Slavic Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30965/22102396-05703011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

那些从事学术工作的人可能会从不时走出研究的筒仓中受益,熟悉其他研究领域的平行研究。很少的历史研究涉及100 % 确实的事它主要涉及可能性和概率的程度。了解其他领域的学者如何处理类似的问题,可以帮助我们调整自己领域的可能性/概率校准。例如,可以应用标准来确定Nil Sorskii作品的确定程度。然后,人们可以将这些标准应用于第二个千年中期其他作者的作品。同时,历史研究的三个标准可以有益地应用于作者问题,例如围绕威廉·莎士比亚和安德烈·库尔布斯基的归属的争议。无论一个人对对手有多沮丧,都需要记住,对人的诋毁并不能促进学术事业。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Attribution Gleanings
Those engaged in scholarly work might benefit from getting out of their silos of research from time to time and become familiar with parallel research in other areas of study. Very little of historical study involves 100 % certainty; it mostly involves degrees of possibility and probability. Finding out how scholars in other fields deal with similar problems can help us adjust the possibility/probability calibrations in our own field. For example, one can apply standards to determine degrees of certainty to works attributed to Nil Sorskii. One can then apply those standards to the works of other mid-second millennium authors. Meanwhile, the three criteria of historical study can beneficially be applied to questions of authorship, such as the controversies surrounding the attributions to William Shakespeare and to Andrei Kurbskii. No matter how frustrated one might get with one’s opponents, one needs to remember that ad hominem denigration does not advance the cause of scholarship.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Canadian-American Slavic Studies
Canadian-American Slavic Studies Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信