评论“爬还是不爬?”Erica Wilson, Noah Nielsen, Pascal Scherrer, Rodney W. Caldicott, Brent Moyle和Betty Weiler在一个标志性的国家公园平衡利益相关者的优先事项

IF 2.4 Q2 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM
M. Hendrickx
{"title":"评论“爬还是不爬?”Erica Wilson, Noah Nielsen, Pascal Scherrer, Rodney W. Caldicott, Brent Moyle和Betty Weiler在一个标志性的国家公园平衡利益相关者的优先事项","authors":"M. Hendrickx","doi":"10.1080/14724049.2021.1903906","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Stakeholder theory provides a means of addressing and formulating responses to challenging issues in managing tourism in sensitive areas. In the case of a stakeholder study at Mt Warning National Park, the views of a key Aboriginal ownership group towards climbing the mountain were not included and their omission misrepresents Aboriginal attitudes to tourism in the park biasing the study outcome. A limitation of stakeholder theory is that significant gaps and policy outcomes emerge if key stakeholders are not consulted. The lack of formal connections of some Indigenous groups with official bodies in Australia makes it difficult to ensure ALL relevant voices are heard.","PeriodicalId":39714,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ecotourism","volume":"21 1","pages":"184 - 186"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14724049.2021.1903906","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comment on ‘To climb or not to climb? Balancing stakeholder priorities at an iconic national park’ by Erica Wilson, Noah Nielsen, Pascal Scherrer, Rodney W. Caldicott, Brent Moyle & Betty Weiler\",\"authors\":\"M. Hendrickx\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14724049.2021.1903906\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Stakeholder theory provides a means of addressing and formulating responses to challenging issues in managing tourism in sensitive areas. In the case of a stakeholder study at Mt Warning National Park, the views of a key Aboriginal ownership group towards climbing the mountain were not included and their omission misrepresents Aboriginal attitudes to tourism in the park biasing the study outcome. A limitation of stakeholder theory is that significant gaps and policy outcomes emerge if key stakeholders are not consulted. The lack of formal connections of some Indigenous groups with official bodies in Australia makes it difficult to ensure ALL relevant voices are heard.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39714,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Ecotourism\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"184 - 186\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14724049.2021.1903906\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Ecotourism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14724049.2021.1903906\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ecotourism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14724049.2021.1903906","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

利益相关者理论提供了一种解决和制定应对敏感地区旅游管理中具有挑战性问题的方法。在对Warning山国家公园进行利益相关者研究的案例中,一个关键的土著所有权群体对登山的看法没有被包括在内,他们的遗漏歪曲了土著对公园旅游业的态度,从而导致了研究结果的偏差。利益相关者理论的一个局限性是,如果不征求关键利益相关者的意见,就会出现重大差距和政策结果。由于一些土著群体与澳大利亚官方机构缺乏正式联系,因此很难确保所有相关的声音都能得到倾听。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comment on ‘To climb or not to climb? Balancing stakeholder priorities at an iconic national park’ by Erica Wilson, Noah Nielsen, Pascal Scherrer, Rodney W. Caldicott, Brent Moyle & Betty Weiler
ABSTRACT Stakeholder theory provides a means of addressing and formulating responses to challenging issues in managing tourism in sensitive areas. In the case of a stakeholder study at Mt Warning National Park, the views of a key Aboriginal ownership group towards climbing the mountain were not included and their omission misrepresents Aboriginal attitudes to tourism in the park biasing the study outcome. A limitation of stakeholder theory is that significant gaps and policy outcomes emerge if key stakeholders are not consulted. The lack of formal connections of some Indigenous groups with official bodies in Australia makes it difficult to ensure ALL relevant voices are heard.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Ecotourism
Journal of Ecotourism Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: The Journal of Ecotourism seeks to advance the field by examining the social, economic, and ecological aspects of ecotourism at a number of scales, and including regions from around the world. Journal of Ecotourism welcomes conceptual, theoretical, and empirical research, particularly where it contributes to the dissemination of new ideas and models of ecotourism planning, development, management, and good practice. While the focus of the journal rests on a type of tourism based principally on natural history - along with other associated features of the man-land nexus - it will consider papers which investigate ecotourism as part of a broader nature based tourism, as well as those works which compare or contrast ecotourism/ists with other forms of tourism/ists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信