捷克版胰岛素输送系统评分问卷的心理测量特性

IF 0.4 Q4 NURSING

Kontakt Pub Date : 2023-06-26 DOI:10.32725/kont.2023.022

Lenka Machálková, Eva Reiterová, Monika Durďáková, E. Gurková

{"title":"捷克版胰岛素输送系统评分问卷的心理测量特性","authors":"Lenka Machálková, Eva Reiterová, Monika Durďáková, E. Gurková","doi":"10.32725/kont.2023.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: The study deals with the linguistic validation and selected aspects (constructive validity and reliability) of the Insulin Delivery System Rating Questionnaire (IDSRQ). Methods: The examined file consisted of 151 patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. The linguistic and content validation IDSRQ was performed, and the results of the questionnaire and individual subscales were processed via descriptive statistics and factor analysis. Results: The data was used to calculate the reliability of seven original subscales (0.42–0.92). Construct validity was tested via exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Models M1, M2 and M3, were created. For models M2 and M3, the significance of the chi-square test ( p < 0.001) and FIT indices was calculated. The five-factor model with a reliability of 0.69–0.89 in subscales was identified as the best. Conclusion: The new version of the questionnaire is in line with the psychometric properties of the original tool, and the extraction of items into a five-factor solution reflects the current assessment of patients’ satisfaction with type 1 diabetes mellitus therapy in the Czech environment.","PeriodicalId":17818,"journal":{"name":"Kontakt","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychometric properties of the Czech version of the Insulin Delivery System Rating Questionnaire\",\"authors\":\"Lenka Machálková, Eva Reiterová, Monika Durďáková, E. Gurková\",\"doi\":\"10.32725/kont.2023.022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: The study deals with the linguistic validation and selected aspects (constructive validity and reliability) of the Insulin Delivery System Rating Questionnaire (IDSRQ). Methods: The examined file consisted of 151 patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. The linguistic and content validation IDSRQ was performed, and the results of the questionnaire and individual subscales were processed via descriptive statistics and factor analysis. Results: The data was used to calculate the reliability of seven original subscales (0.42–0.92). Construct validity was tested via exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Models M1, M2 and M3, were created. For models M2 and M3, the significance of the chi-square test ( p < 0.001) and FIT indices was calculated. The five-factor model with a reliability of 0.69–0.89 in subscales was identified as the best. Conclusion: The new version of the questionnaire is in line with the psychometric properties of the original tool, and the extraction of items into a five-factor solution reflects the current assessment of patients’ satisfaction with type 1 diabetes mellitus therapy in the Czech environment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17818,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kontakt\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kontakt\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32725/kont.2023.022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kontakt","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32725/kont.2023.022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

目的：研究胰岛素输送系统评分问卷（IDSRQ）的语言验证和选择方面（结构有效性和可靠性）。方法：对151例1型糖尿病患者进行回顾性分析。进行语言和内容验证IDSRQ，并通过描述性统计和因素分析处理问卷和个人分量表的结果。结果：数据用于计算7个原始分量表（0.42–0.92）的信度。通过探索性和验证性因素分析检验结构有效性。创建了M1、M2和M3型。对于模型M2和M3，计算卡方检验（p＜0.001）和FIT指数的显著性。分量表信度为0.69–0.89的五因素模型被认为是最好的。结论：新版问卷符合原始工具的心理测量特性，将项目提取为五因素解决方案反映了捷克环境中患者对1型糖尿病治疗的满意度评估。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Psychometric properties of the Czech version of the Insulin Delivery System Rating Questionnaire

Aim: The study deals with the linguistic validation and selected aspects (constructive validity and reliability) of the Insulin Delivery System Rating Questionnaire (IDSRQ). Methods: The examined file consisted of 151 patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. The linguistic and content validation IDSRQ was performed, and the results of the questionnaire and individual subscales were processed via descriptive statistics and factor analysis. Results: The data was used to calculate the reliability of seven original subscales (0.42–0.92). Construct validity was tested via exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Models M1, M2 and M3, were created. For models M2 and M3, the significance of the chi-square test ( p < 0.001) and FIT indices was calculated. The five-factor model with a reliability of 0.69–0.89 in subscales was identified as the best. Conclusion: The new version of the questionnaire is in line with the psychometric properties of the original tool, and the extraction of items into a five-factor solution reflects the current assessment of patients’ satisfaction with type 1 diabetes mellitus therapy in the Czech environment.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Kontakt Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

CiteScore

0.60

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

12 weeks

期刊介绍： Articles are published in two sections: 1. The nursing section focuses on the support of nursing via the dissemination of the latest, evidence-based peer reviewed findings. The section serves as a forum for the exchange of knowledge relating to the education of nurses, the exchange of knowledge and skills in clinical nursing, the development of nursing concepts and innovation in health policy. It deals with the legal and ethical issues, nurses'' views on patient safety, nursing activities in multicultural environments and progress in nursing practice. The main topic areas include: -Clinical nursing -Management in nursing -Evidence-based nursing -Multicultural nursing -Nursing ethics -Quality of life in illness 2. The social sciences in health section accepts contributions relating to any aspect of health from a broad perspective of the social sciences, including the medical impact on society. It also accepts contributions dealing with ethical issues in health care, risk management and the impact of political and economic conditions in the field of health. The aim of the articles is to develop understanding and to provide practical application of quantitative and qualitative research methods concerning the management, application or use of the research in health and social care. The main topic areas include: -Social determinants of health -Social work and health -Legal and economic issues concerning health -Ethical issues in social sciences and health