不同管理制度下果树的碳封存

Q3 Social Sciences
Muhamud Nabalegwa Wambede, Gertrude Akello, Andrew Mulabbi, Bernard Barasa, J. S. Lugumira, David Amonya
{"title":"不同管理制度下果树的碳封存","authors":"Muhamud Nabalegwa Wambede, Gertrude Akello, Andrew Mulabbi, Bernard Barasa, J. S. Lugumira, David Amonya","doi":"10.22146/ijg.70203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed at establishing the potential of fruit trees in carbon sequestration. The specific objectives were to establish the carbon stocks in fruit trees compare the potential of carbon stocks in citrus and mango trees and examine the relationship between the management practices and carbon stocks in fruit trees. At the farm level, plots were identified and transects established and individual fruit trees from sampled individual farms along the transect were selected. At the tree level, measurements of tree height and diameter at breast height were made. They were converted to biomass using allometric equations. Analysis of Variance was used to compare the differences in carbon stocks between the fruit trees and between the different management practices.  Findings revealed higher biomass and carbon stocks in mango trees as compared to citrus (74.57 ± 14.95 and 13.52 ± 1.25 t/ha respectively). Significant differences are also reported in carbon stocks under different management practices (p < 0.05). Irrespective of the species type, above-ground carbon under different management practices followed the order (from highest to lowest): Inorganic fertilizer < Intercrop < Monocrop < organic fertilizer and irrigation < intercrop and inorganic fertilizer.  The results also point out that mango fruits have a high potential to sequestrate carbon emissions hence mitigating global warming.","PeriodicalId":52460,"journal":{"name":"Indonesian Journal of Geography","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Carbon Sequestration of Fruit Trees under Contrasting Management Regimes\",\"authors\":\"Muhamud Nabalegwa Wambede, Gertrude Akello, Andrew Mulabbi, Bernard Barasa, J. S. Lugumira, David Amonya\",\"doi\":\"10.22146/ijg.70203\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aimed at establishing the potential of fruit trees in carbon sequestration. The specific objectives were to establish the carbon stocks in fruit trees compare the potential of carbon stocks in citrus and mango trees and examine the relationship between the management practices and carbon stocks in fruit trees. At the farm level, plots were identified and transects established and individual fruit trees from sampled individual farms along the transect were selected. At the tree level, measurements of tree height and diameter at breast height were made. They were converted to biomass using allometric equations. Analysis of Variance was used to compare the differences in carbon stocks between the fruit trees and between the different management practices.  Findings revealed higher biomass and carbon stocks in mango trees as compared to citrus (74.57 ± 14.95 and 13.52 ± 1.25 t/ha respectively). Significant differences are also reported in carbon stocks under different management practices (p < 0.05). Irrespective of the species type, above-ground carbon under different management practices followed the order (from highest to lowest): Inorganic fertilizer < Intercrop < Monocrop < organic fertilizer and irrigation < intercrop and inorganic fertilizer.  The results also point out that mango fruits have a high potential to sequestrate carbon emissions hence mitigating global warming.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52460,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indonesian Journal of Geography\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indonesian Journal of Geography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22146/ijg.70203\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesian Journal of Geography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22146/ijg.70203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项研究旨在确定果树在碳固存方面的潜力。具体目标是建立果树的碳储量,比较柑橘和芒果树的碳储量潜力,并研究管理实践与果树碳储量之间的关系。在农场一级,确定了地块,建立了样带,并从样带沿线的单个农场中选择了单个果树。在树木水平上,测量了树木的高度和乳高处的直径。使用异速生长方程将它们转化为生物量。方差分析用于比较果树之间和不同管理实践之间的碳储量差异。研究结果显示,与柑橘相比,芒果树的生物量和碳储量更高(分别为74.57±14.95和13.52±1.25 t/ha)。不同管理方式下的碳储量也存在显著差异(p<0.05)。无论物种类型如何,不同管理方式的地上碳含量顺序(从高到低)为:无机肥料<间作<单作<有机肥料,灌溉<间作和无机肥料。研究结果还指出,芒果有很高的潜力封存碳排放,从而缓解全球变暖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Carbon Sequestration of Fruit Trees under Contrasting Management Regimes
This study aimed at establishing the potential of fruit trees in carbon sequestration. The specific objectives were to establish the carbon stocks in fruit trees compare the potential of carbon stocks in citrus and mango trees and examine the relationship between the management practices and carbon stocks in fruit trees. At the farm level, plots were identified and transects established and individual fruit trees from sampled individual farms along the transect were selected. At the tree level, measurements of tree height and diameter at breast height were made. They were converted to biomass using allometric equations. Analysis of Variance was used to compare the differences in carbon stocks between the fruit trees and between the different management practices.  Findings revealed higher biomass and carbon stocks in mango trees as compared to citrus (74.57 ± 14.95 and 13.52 ± 1.25 t/ha respectively). Significant differences are also reported in carbon stocks under different management practices (p < 0.05). Irrespective of the species type, above-ground carbon under different management practices followed the order (from highest to lowest): Inorganic fertilizer < Intercrop < Monocrop < organic fertilizer and irrigation < intercrop and inorganic fertilizer.  The results also point out that mango fruits have a high potential to sequestrate carbon emissions hence mitigating global warming.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Indonesian Journal of Geography
Indonesian Journal of Geography Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Indonesian Journal of Geography ISSN 2354-9114 (online), ISSN 0024-9521 (print) is an international journal published by the Faculty of Geography, Universitas Gadjah Mada in collaboration with The Indonesian Geographers Association. Our scope of publications include physical geography, human geography, regional planning and development, cartography, remote sensing, geographic information system, environmental science, and social science. IJG publishes its issues three times a year in April, August, and December. Indonesian Journal of Geography welcomes high-quality original and well-written manuscripts on any of the following topics: 1. Geomorphology 2. Climatology 3. Biogeography 4. Soils Geography 5. Population Geography 6. Behavioral Geography 7. Economic Geography 8. Political Geography 9. Historical Geography 10. Geographic Information Systems 11. Cartography 12. Quantification Methods in Geography 13. Remote Sensing 14. Regional development and planning 15. Disaster The Journal publishes Research Articles, Review Article, Short Communications, Comments/Responses and Corrections
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信