同性恋历史的酷儿策略:博斯韦尔的“武器”、福柯的经验

IF 0.2 4区 文学 0 LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM
François·e Charmaille
{"title":"同性恋历史的酷儿策略:博斯韦尔的“武器”、福柯的经验","authors":"François·e Charmaille","doi":"10.1353/dia.2020.0025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This essay revisits the genealogy of Michel Foucault's Histoire de la sexualité and calls for a reassessment of its later volumes as politically engaged expériences in historiography. Recontextualizing their work within the Essentialist–Social Constructionist debate that took place among historians and theorists of sexuality in the 1980s, I show that the relations between John Boswell, the most prominent \"essentialist,\" and Michel Foucault, the most prominent \"constructionist,\" were much more amicable and complex than commentators have previously claimed. Boswell served as a \"guide\" for the last three volumes of Foucault's Histoire de la sexualité. By uncovering the considerable influence oswell's supposedly \"essentializing\" concept of \"gay\" had on Foucault's later writings and politics, I demonstrate that Foucault was not committed to the historicization of sexual concepts, but rather to the transformation, through historiography, of present-day relations. This process, at once historiographical, intellectual, subjective, and political, is what Foucault calls expérience.","PeriodicalId":46840,"journal":{"name":"DIACRITICS-A REVIEW OF CONTEMPORARY CRITICISM","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Queer Strategies of Gay History: Boswell's \\\"Weapons\\\", Foucault's Expérience\",\"authors\":\"François·e Charmaille\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/dia.2020.0025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:This essay revisits the genealogy of Michel Foucault's Histoire de la sexualité and calls for a reassessment of its later volumes as politically engaged expériences in historiography. Recontextualizing their work within the Essentialist–Social Constructionist debate that took place among historians and theorists of sexuality in the 1980s, I show that the relations between John Boswell, the most prominent \\\"essentialist,\\\" and Michel Foucault, the most prominent \\\"constructionist,\\\" were much more amicable and complex than commentators have previously claimed. Boswell served as a \\\"guide\\\" for the last three volumes of Foucault's Histoire de la sexualité. By uncovering the considerable influence oswell's supposedly \\\"essentializing\\\" concept of \\\"gay\\\" had on Foucault's later writings and politics, I demonstrate that Foucault was not committed to the historicization of sexual concepts, but rather to the transformation, through historiography, of present-day relations. This process, at once historiographical, intellectual, subjective, and political, is what Foucault calls expérience.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46840,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"DIACRITICS-A REVIEW OF CONTEMPORARY CRITICISM\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"DIACRITICS-A REVIEW OF CONTEMPORARY CRITICISM\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/dia.2020.0025\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DIACRITICS-A REVIEW OF CONTEMPORARY CRITICISM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/dia.2020.0025","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本文重新审视了米歇尔·福柯的《性学史》的谱系,并呼吁重新评估其后期的著作,将其视为参与政治的史学经验。在20世纪80年代历史学家和性理论家之间发生的本质主义者-社会建构主义者辩论中,我重新审视了他们的工作,我发现最著名的“本质主义者”约翰·博斯韦尔和最杰出的“建构主义者”米歇尔·福柯之间的关系比评论家之前声称的要友好和复杂得多。博斯韦尔是福柯《性学史》最后三卷的“指南”。通过揭示奥斯威尔所谓的“本质化”的“同性恋”概念对福柯后来的写作和政治产生的巨大影响,我证明福柯并没有致力于性概念的历史化,而是致力于通过史学对当今关系的转变。这个过程,既是历史的、知识的、主观的和政治的,就是福柯所说的经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Queer Strategies of Gay History: Boswell's "Weapons", Foucault's Expérience
Abstract:This essay revisits the genealogy of Michel Foucault's Histoire de la sexualité and calls for a reassessment of its later volumes as politically engaged expériences in historiography. Recontextualizing their work within the Essentialist–Social Constructionist debate that took place among historians and theorists of sexuality in the 1980s, I show that the relations between John Boswell, the most prominent "essentialist," and Michel Foucault, the most prominent "constructionist," were much more amicable and complex than commentators have previously claimed. Boswell served as a "guide" for the last three volumes of Foucault's Histoire de la sexualité. By uncovering the considerable influence oswell's supposedly "essentializing" concept of "gay" had on Foucault's later writings and politics, I demonstrate that Foucault was not committed to the historicization of sexual concepts, but rather to the transformation, through historiography, of present-day relations. This process, at once historiographical, intellectual, subjective, and political, is what Foucault calls expérience.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
DIACRITICS-A REVIEW OF CONTEMPORARY CRITICISM
DIACRITICS-A REVIEW OF CONTEMPORARY CRITICISM LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: For over thirty years, diacritics has been an exceptional and influential forum for scholars writing on the problems of literary criticism. Each issue features articles in which contributors compare and analyze books on particular theoretical works and develop their own positions on the theses, methods, and theoretical implications of those works.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信