扫描源光学相干断层生物测量技术在后房型人工晶状体植入术中的应用效果

IF 0.1 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Min So Jo, Jaclyn Moon, S. Chung, E. Kim, Kyu Hong Park, J. Choi
{"title":"扫描源光学相干断层生物测量技术在后房型人工晶状体植入术中的应用效果","authors":"Min So Jo, Jaclyn Moon, S. Chung, E. Kim, Kyu Hong Park, J. Choi","doi":"10.3341/jkos.2023.64.5.374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The proper implantable collamer lens (ICL) size affects ICL stability. This study compared device efficacy using white-to-white diameter (WTW) measurements with Orbscan II and IOL Master 700.Methods: We retrospectively studied 90 eyes (45 patients) who underwent toric ICL implantation from January 2019 to February 2020 and were followed for 1 year. The correlation between WTW and anterior chamber depth (ACD) for each measuring device was analyzed.Results: The mean WTW measured by IOL Master 700 and Orbscan II was 12.2 ± 0.3 and 11.6 ± 0.3 mm, respectively, while the mean ACD was 3.28 ± 0.16 and 3.20 ± 0.15 mm. The WTW and ACD measured with IOL Master 700 averaged 0.57 ± 0.12 and 0.08 ± 0.04 mm larger than with Orbscan II. The differences were significant and the regression analysis had high correlations (R2 = 0.875 and R2 = 0.913, respectively; both p < 0.001).Conclusions: WTW measured by the IOL Master 700 can be used as a reference either alone or together with the Orbscan II value to determine ICL size.","PeriodicalId":17341,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The Korean Ophthalmological Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of Biometry Using Swept-source Optical Coherence Tomography for Posterior Chamber Phakic Intraocular Lens Implantation\",\"authors\":\"Min So Jo, Jaclyn Moon, S. Chung, E. Kim, Kyu Hong Park, J. Choi\",\"doi\":\"10.3341/jkos.2023.64.5.374\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: The proper implantable collamer lens (ICL) size affects ICL stability. This study compared device efficacy using white-to-white diameter (WTW) measurements with Orbscan II and IOL Master 700.Methods: We retrospectively studied 90 eyes (45 patients) who underwent toric ICL implantation from January 2019 to February 2020 and were followed for 1 year. The correlation between WTW and anterior chamber depth (ACD) for each measuring device was analyzed.Results: The mean WTW measured by IOL Master 700 and Orbscan II was 12.2 ± 0.3 and 11.6 ± 0.3 mm, respectively, while the mean ACD was 3.28 ± 0.16 and 3.20 ± 0.15 mm. The WTW and ACD measured with IOL Master 700 averaged 0.57 ± 0.12 and 0.08 ± 0.04 mm larger than with Orbscan II. The differences were significant and the regression analysis had high correlations (R2 = 0.875 and R2 = 0.913, respectively; both p < 0.001).Conclusions: WTW measured by the IOL Master 700 can be used as a reference either alone or together with the Orbscan II value to determine ICL size.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17341,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of The Korean Ophthalmological Society\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of The Korean Ophthalmological Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3341/jkos.2023.64.5.374\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The Korean Ophthalmological Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3341/jkos.2023.64.5.374","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:合适的植入式拼片透镜(ICL)尺寸影响ICL的稳定性。本研究比较了使用白色到白色直径(WTW)测量与Orbscan II和IOL Master 700的装置疗效。方法:我们回顾性研究了2019年1月至2020年2月接受复曲面ICL植入并随访1年的90眼(45名患者)。分析了每种测量装置的WTW与前房深度(ACD)之间的相关性。结果:IOL Master 700和Orbscan II测得的平均WTW分别为12.2±0.3和11.6±0.3mm,而平均ACD分别为3.28±0.16和3.20±0.15mm。差异显著,回归分析具有高度相关性(R2=0.875和R2=0.913;均<0.001)。结论:IOL Master 700测量的WTW可单独或与Orbscan II值一起用作参考,以确定ICL大小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy of Biometry Using Swept-source Optical Coherence Tomography for Posterior Chamber Phakic Intraocular Lens Implantation
Purpose: The proper implantable collamer lens (ICL) size affects ICL stability. This study compared device efficacy using white-to-white diameter (WTW) measurements with Orbscan II and IOL Master 700.Methods: We retrospectively studied 90 eyes (45 patients) who underwent toric ICL implantation from January 2019 to February 2020 and were followed for 1 year. The correlation between WTW and anterior chamber depth (ACD) for each measuring device was analyzed.Results: The mean WTW measured by IOL Master 700 and Orbscan II was 12.2 ± 0.3 and 11.6 ± 0.3 mm, respectively, while the mean ACD was 3.28 ± 0.16 and 3.20 ± 0.15 mm. The WTW and ACD measured with IOL Master 700 averaged 0.57 ± 0.12 and 0.08 ± 0.04 mm larger than with Orbscan II. The differences were significant and the regression analysis had high correlations (R2 = 0.875 and R2 = 0.913, respectively; both p < 0.001).Conclusions: WTW measured by the IOL Master 700 can be used as a reference either alone or together with the Orbscan II value to determine ICL size.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
126
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信