N. Nguyen, A. Alabaster, S. Simmons, M. Weintraub, C. Powell
{"title":"剖宫产时机会性输卵管切除术技术:一项回顾性队列研究","authors":"N. Nguyen, A. Alabaster, S. Simmons, M. Weintraub, C. Powell","doi":"10.14740/jcgo574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Recent studies have addressed uptake and safety of opportunistic salpingectomy at the time of cesarean delivery. However, there are limited data on outcomes of the surgical techniques used for salpingectomy at cesarean delivery, thus addressing this topic may influence uptake of opportunistic salpingectomy. This study aimed to compare perioperative outcomes of opportunistic salpingectomy techniques used at the time of cesarean delivery. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of women undergoing opportunistic salpingectomy for elective sterilization at cesarean delivery between 2011 and 2016 within Kaiser Permanente Northern California. We compared outcomes of salpingectomy performed with a bipolar electrocautery device (LigaSure, Metronic, MD, USA) versus suture ligation. Primary outcomes were surgical and operative room times. Secondary outcomes included estimated blood loss, intraoperative complications, blood transfusions, number of surgeons, length of hospital stay, readmissions and emergency room visits after discharge. We used bivariate and multivariable analyses to identify factors associated with salpingectomy technique. Results: We identified 194 patients with salpingectomies at time of cesarean delivery, of whom 97 (50%) had salpingectomies by bipolar electrocautery and 97 (50%) by suture ligation. In bivariate analysis, salpingectomy by bipolar electrocautery was associated with less estimated blood loss (600 vs. 760 mL, 95%, P = 0.04), shorter operating room times (96 vs. 104 min, P = 0.046) and more surgeons involved (P < 0.001), while the difference in surgery time was not significant (59 vs. 65 min, P = 0.06). Adjusting for statistically significant covariates in multivariable analysis, body mass index and prior abdominal surgery, salpingectomies using bipolar electrocautery were shorter in surgery time than using suture ligation (-10.74 min, confidence interval: -21, -0.49). There were no statistical differences in length of stay, readmission, emergency room visits after discharge, or number of surgeons involved. Two intraoperative complications occurred during salpingectomy and there were two blood transfusions. Conclusions: Salpingectomy was associated with shorter surgery time of 11 min with bipolar electrocautery instead of suture ligation, with no observed differences in postoperative complications. J Clin Gynecol Obstet. 2019;8(3):70-76 doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/jcgo574","PeriodicalId":87296,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical gynecology and obstetrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Opportunistic Salpingectomy Techniques at the Time of Cesarean Delivery: A Retrospective Cohort Study\",\"authors\":\"N. Nguyen, A. Alabaster, S. Simmons, M. Weintraub, C. Powell\",\"doi\":\"10.14740/jcgo574\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Recent studies have addressed uptake and safety of opportunistic salpingectomy at the time of cesarean delivery. However, there are limited data on outcomes of the surgical techniques used for salpingectomy at cesarean delivery, thus addressing this topic may influence uptake of opportunistic salpingectomy. This study aimed to compare perioperative outcomes of opportunistic salpingectomy techniques used at the time of cesarean delivery. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of women undergoing opportunistic salpingectomy for elective sterilization at cesarean delivery between 2011 and 2016 within Kaiser Permanente Northern California. We compared outcomes of salpingectomy performed with a bipolar electrocautery device (LigaSure, Metronic, MD, USA) versus suture ligation. Primary outcomes were surgical and operative room times. Secondary outcomes included estimated blood loss, intraoperative complications, blood transfusions, number of surgeons, length of hospital stay, readmissions and emergency room visits after discharge. We used bivariate and multivariable analyses to identify factors associated with salpingectomy technique. Results: We identified 194 patients with salpingectomies at time of cesarean delivery, of whom 97 (50%) had salpingectomies by bipolar electrocautery and 97 (50%) by suture ligation. In bivariate analysis, salpingectomy by bipolar electrocautery was associated with less estimated blood loss (600 vs. 760 mL, 95%, P = 0.04), shorter operating room times (96 vs. 104 min, P = 0.046) and more surgeons involved (P < 0.001), while the difference in surgery time was not significant (59 vs. 65 min, P = 0.06). Adjusting for statistically significant covariates in multivariable analysis, body mass index and prior abdominal surgery, salpingectomies using bipolar electrocautery were shorter in surgery time than using suture ligation (-10.74 min, confidence interval: -21, -0.49). There were no statistical differences in length of stay, readmission, emergency room visits after discharge, or number of surgeons involved. Two intraoperative complications occurred during salpingectomy and there were two blood transfusions. Conclusions: Salpingectomy was associated with shorter surgery time of 11 min with bipolar electrocautery instead of suture ligation, with no observed differences in postoperative complications. J Clin Gynecol Obstet. 2019;8(3):70-76 doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/jcgo574\",\"PeriodicalId\":87296,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of clinical gynecology and obstetrics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of clinical gynecology and obstetrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14740/jcgo574\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical gynecology and obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14740/jcgo574","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
摘要
背景:最近的研究讨论了在剖宫产时机会性输卵管切除术的吸收和安全性。然而,关于剖宫产中输卵管切除术的手术技术结果的数据有限,因此解决这个问题可能会影响机会性输卵管切除术的接受。本研究旨在比较在剖宫产时使用的机会性输卵管切除术技术的围手术期结果。方法:这是一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象是2011年至2016年间在北加州凯撒医疗机构(Kaiser Permanente Northern California)剖腹产手术中接受机会性输卵管切除术择期绝育的女性。我们比较了双极电灼装置(LigaSure, Metronic, MD, USA)和缝合结扎进行输卵管切除术的结果。主要结果为手术次数和手术室次数。次要结局包括估计失血量、术中并发症、输血、外科医生数量、住院时间、再入院和出院后急诊室就诊次数。我们使用双变量和多变量分析来确定与输卵管切除术技术相关的因素。结果:194例剖宫产时行输卵管切除术的患者,其中97例(50%)行双极电切术,97例(50%)行缝合结扎术。在双变量分析中,双极电切输卵管术与更少的估计失血量(600 vs 760 mL, 95%, P = 0.04)、更短的手术室时间(96 vs 104 min, P = 0.046)和更多的外科医生相关(P < 0.001),而手术时间差异不显著(59 vs 65 min, P = 0.06)。调整多变量分析中具有统计学意义的协变量、体重指数和既往腹部手术,双极电切输卵管手术时间比缝合结扎短(-10.74分钟,可信区间:-21,-0.49)。在住院时间、再入院、出院后急诊室就诊或涉及的外科医生数量方面没有统计学差异。输卵管切除术中出现2例术中并发症,输2次血。结论:双极电切输卵管比缝合结扎手术时间更短,手术时间为11 min,术后并发症无明显差异。临床妇产科杂志,2019;8(3):70-76 doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/jcgo574
Opportunistic Salpingectomy Techniques at the Time of Cesarean Delivery: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Background: Recent studies have addressed uptake and safety of opportunistic salpingectomy at the time of cesarean delivery. However, there are limited data on outcomes of the surgical techniques used for salpingectomy at cesarean delivery, thus addressing this topic may influence uptake of opportunistic salpingectomy. This study aimed to compare perioperative outcomes of opportunistic salpingectomy techniques used at the time of cesarean delivery. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of women undergoing opportunistic salpingectomy for elective sterilization at cesarean delivery between 2011 and 2016 within Kaiser Permanente Northern California. We compared outcomes of salpingectomy performed with a bipolar electrocautery device (LigaSure, Metronic, MD, USA) versus suture ligation. Primary outcomes were surgical and operative room times. Secondary outcomes included estimated blood loss, intraoperative complications, blood transfusions, number of surgeons, length of hospital stay, readmissions and emergency room visits after discharge. We used bivariate and multivariable analyses to identify factors associated with salpingectomy technique. Results: We identified 194 patients with salpingectomies at time of cesarean delivery, of whom 97 (50%) had salpingectomies by bipolar electrocautery and 97 (50%) by suture ligation. In bivariate analysis, salpingectomy by bipolar electrocautery was associated with less estimated blood loss (600 vs. 760 mL, 95%, P = 0.04), shorter operating room times (96 vs. 104 min, P = 0.046) and more surgeons involved (P < 0.001), while the difference in surgery time was not significant (59 vs. 65 min, P = 0.06). Adjusting for statistically significant covariates in multivariable analysis, body mass index and prior abdominal surgery, salpingectomies using bipolar electrocautery were shorter in surgery time than using suture ligation (-10.74 min, confidence interval: -21, -0.49). There were no statistical differences in length of stay, readmission, emergency room visits after discharge, or number of surgeons involved. Two intraoperative complications occurred during salpingectomy and there were two blood transfusions. Conclusions: Salpingectomy was associated with shorter surgery time of 11 min with bipolar electrocautery instead of suture ligation, with no observed differences in postoperative complications. J Clin Gynecol Obstet. 2019;8(3):70-76 doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/jcgo574