解码人工智能辅助人类设计团队的敏捷性

IF 3.2 1区工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING

Design Studies Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.destud.2022.101094

Binyang Song, Joshua T. Gyory, Guanglu Zhang, Nicolas F. Soria Zurita, Gary Stump, Jay Martin, Simon Miller, Corey Balon, Michael Yukish, Christopher McComb, Jonathan Cagan

{"title":"解码人工智能辅助人类设计团队的敏捷性","authors":"Binyang Song, Joshua T. Gyory, Guanglu Zhang, Nicolas F. Soria Zurita, Gary Stump, Jay Martin, Simon Miller, Corey Balon, Michael Yukish, Christopher McComb, Jonathan Cagan","doi":"10.1016/j.destud.2022.101094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Although necessary for complex problem solving, such as engineering design, team agility is often difficult to achieve in practice. The evolution of Artificial Intelligence (AI) affords unique opportunities for supporting team problem solving. While integrating assistive AI agents into human teams has at times improved team performance, it is still unclear if, how, and why AI affects team agility. A large-scale human experiment answers these questions, revealing that, with appropriately interfaced AIs, AI-assisted human teams enjoy improved coordination and communications, leading to better performance and adaptations to team disruptions, while devoting more effort to information handling and exploring the solution space more broadly. In sum, working with AI enables human team members to think more and act less.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50593,"journal":{"name":"Design Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0142694X2200014X/pdfft?md5=4808d4b72964680013a58106c0872c44&pid=1-s2.0-S0142694X2200014X-main.pdf","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Decoding the agility of artificial intelligence-assisted human design teams\",\"authors\":\"Binyang Song, Joshua T. Gyory, Guanglu Zhang, Nicolas F. Soria Zurita, Gary Stump, Jay Martin, Simon Miller, Corey Balon, Michael Yukish, Christopher McComb, Jonathan Cagan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.destud.2022.101094\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Although necessary for complex problem solving, such as engineering design, team agility is often difficult to achieve in practice. The evolution of Artificial Intelligence (AI) affords unique opportunities for supporting team problem solving. While integrating assistive AI agents into human teams has at times improved team performance, it is still unclear if, how, and why AI affects team agility. A large-scale human experiment answers these questions, revealing that, with appropriately interfaced AIs, AI-assisted human teams enjoy improved coordination and communications, leading to better performance and adaptations to team disruptions, while devoting more effort to information handling and exploring the solution space more broadly. In sum, working with AI enables human team members to think more and act less.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50593,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Design Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0142694X2200014X/pdfft?md5=4808d4b72964680013a58106c0872c44&pid=1-s2.0-S0142694X2200014X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Design Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0142694X2200014X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Design Studies","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0142694X2200014X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 9

摘要

尽管对于复杂问题的解决(如工程设计)是必要的，但团队敏捷性在实践中往往难以实现。人工智能(AI)的发展为支持团队解决问题提供了独特的机会。虽然将辅助人工智能代理集成到人类团队中有时会提高团队绩效，但人工智能是否、如何以及为什么会影响团队的敏捷性仍不清楚。一项大规模的人体实验回答了这些问题，结果表明，通过适当的人工智能接口，人工智能辅助的人类团队可以改善协调和沟通，从而提高绩效，适应团队中断，同时将更多精力投入到信息处理和更广泛地探索解决方案空间。总而言之，与人工智能合作可以让人类团队成员多思考少行动。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Decoding the agility of artificial intelligence-assisted human design teams

Although necessary for complex problem solving, such as engineering design, team agility is often difficult to achieve in practice. The evolution of Artificial Intelligence (AI) affords unique opportunities for supporting team problem solving. While integrating assistive AI agents into human teams has at times improved team performance, it is still unclear if, how, and why AI affects team agility. A large-scale human experiment answers these questions, revealing that, with appropriately interfaced AIs, AI-assisted human teams enjoy improved coordination and communications, leading to better performance and adaptations to team disruptions, while devoting more effort to information handling and exploring the solution space more broadly. In sum, working with AI enables human team members to think more and act less.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Design Studies 工程技术-工程：制造

CiteScore

8.60

自引率

20.00%

发文量

审稿时长

40 days

期刊介绍： Design Studies is a leading international academic journal focused on developing understanding of design processes. It studies design activity across all domains of application, including engineering and product design, architectural and urban design, computer artefacts and systems design. It therefore provides an interdisciplinary forum for the analysis, development and discussion of fundamental aspects of design activity, from cognition and methodology to values and philosophy. Design Studies publishes work that is concerned with the process of designing, and is relevant to a broad audience of researchers, teachers and practitioners. We welcome original, scientific and scholarly research papers reporting studies concerned with the process of designing in all its many fields, or furthering the development and application of new knowledge relating to design process. Papers should be written to be intelligible and pertinent to a wide range of readership across different design domains. To be relevant for this journal, a paper has to offer something that gives new insight into or knowledge about the design process, or assists new development of the processes of designing.