书评:李珂的《自由婚姻:当代中国的国家法律、权力和不平等》和伊森·迈克尔森的《脱钩:中国离婚法庭中的性别不公正》

IF 7.2 1区 社会学 Q1 SOCIOLOGY
Kristin M. Sangren
{"title":"书评:李珂的《自由婚姻:当代中国的国家法律、权力和不平等》和伊森·迈克尔森的《脱钩:中国离婚法庭中的性别不公正》","authors":"Kristin M. Sangren","doi":"10.1177/08912432231177224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chapter five and the postscript provide the last opportunities for Nishida to expand her work beyond the typical iterations of activism and theorizing one might expect in an academic text. Chapter five tells the stories of bed activists through their own experiences, their dreams and imagination, where another world is possible despite the ableist realities we all face daily. The postscript offers important insights from our collect experiences in the mass disabling event of the COVID pandemic. With special care taken to acknowledge the real fatigue disabled people experience educating an ableist world inside a pandemic, Nishida challenges readers to center disabled voices at this time and follow their lead while simultaneously voicing the frustration of writing about a pandemic inside of one. The most challenging part of this text is reading the ableist perspectives of largely Black migrant women care workers of mostly white disabled Medicaid enrollees. Nishida captures the discriminatory design built into the care worker/care partner relationship and the resulting antagonisms that make the situation tough to negotiate. Care workers are working in a system that already devalues their labor, partially because of who they are and who they care for. Care partners are invited into a system that allows them to think of their care workers as service providers, with the accompanying potential for racialized interactions with “the help.” Nishida traverses this tension well, but the complexity of the multiple power differentials in this arrangement is difficult to track and address with equity, begging the unanswered question of whether the shape of these multiple power imbalances is similar, a potential new line of inquiry this text might inspire. Just Care, in both content and form, embodies just care.","PeriodicalId":48351,"journal":{"name":"Gender & Society","volume":"37 1","pages":"650 - 654"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Book Review: Marriage Unbound: State Law, Power, and Inequality in Contemporary China by Ke Li and Decoupling: Gender Injustice in China’s Divorce Courts by Ethan Michelson\",\"authors\":\"Kristin M. Sangren\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08912432231177224\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Chapter five and the postscript provide the last opportunities for Nishida to expand her work beyond the typical iterations of activism and theorizing one might expect in an academic text. Chapter five tells the stories of bed activists through their own experiences, their dreams and imagination, where another world is possible despite the ableist realities we all face daily. The postscript offers important insights from our collect experiences in the mass disabling event of the COVID pandemic. With special care taken to acknowledge the real fatigue disabled people experience educating an ableist world inside a pandemic, Nishida challenges readers to center disabled voices at this time and follow their lead while simultaneously voicing the frustration of writing about a pandemic inside of one. The most challenging part of this text is reading the ableist perspectives of largely Black migrant women care workers of mostly white disabled Medicaid enrollees. Nishida captures the discriminatory design built into the care worker/care partner relationship and the resulting antagonisms that make the situation tough to negotiate. Care workers are working in a system that already devalues their labor, partially because of who they are and who they care for. Care partners are invited into a system that allows them to think of their care workers as service providers, with the accompanying potential for racialized interactions with “the help.” Nishida traverses this tension well, but the complexity of the multiple power differentials in this arrangement is difficult to track and address with equity, begging the unanswered question of whether the shape of these multiple power imbalances is similar, a potential new line of inquiry this text might inspire. Just Care, in both content and form, embodies just care.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48351,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gender & Society\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"650 - 654\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gender & Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08912432231177224\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gender & Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08912432231177224","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

第五章和后记为西田扩展她的作品提供了最后的机会,使其超越了人们在学术文本中可能期望的典型的行动主义和理论化的迭代。第五章讲述了床上活动家的故事,通过他们自己的经历,他们的梦想和想象,尽管我们每天都面临着健康主义的现实,但另一个世界是可能的。后记提供了我们在COVID大流行的大规模致残事件中收集的经验的重要见解。西田特别注意到残疾人在大流行中教育一个健体世界所经历的真正疲劳,他要求读者在这个时候集中残疾人的声音,跟随他们的领导,同时表达在大流行中写作的挫败感。这篇文章中最具挑战性的部分是阅读主要是黑人移民妇女的残疾主义观点,主要是白人残疾医疗补助登记者的护理工作者。西田抓住了护工/护工伙伴关系中的歧视性设计,以及由此产生的对抗,使这种情况难以协商。护理工作者的工作体系已经贬低了他们的劳动价值,部分原因在于他们的身份和他们所照顾的对象。护理伙伴被邀请进入一个系统,这个系统允许他们把他们的护理人员视为服务提供者,伴随而来的是与“帮助者”进行种族化互动的潜力。西田很好地处理了这种紧张关系,但在这种安排中,多重权力差异的复杂性很难追踪和公平地处理,这回避了一个悬而未决的问题,即这些多重权力不平衡的形态是否相似,这可能是本文启发的一条潜在的新探究线。Just Care在内容和形式上都体现了Just Care。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Book Review: Marriage Unbound: State Law, Power, and Inequality in Contemporary China by Ke Li and Decoupling: Gender Injustice in China’s Divorce Courts by Ethan Michelson
Chapter five and the postscript provide the last opportunities for Nishida to expand her work beyond the typical iterations of activism and theorizing one might expect in an academic text. Chapter five tells the stories of bed activists through their own experiences, their dreams and imagination, where another world is possible despite the ableist realities we all face daily. The postscript offers important insights from our collect experiences in the mass disabling event of the COVID pandemic. With special care taken to acknowledge the real fatigue disabled people experience educating an ableist world inside a pandemic, Nishida challenges readers to center disabled voices at this time and follow their lead while simultaneously voicing the frustration of writing about a pandemic inside of one. The most challenging part of this text is reading the ableist perspectives of largely Black migrant women care workers of mostly white disabled Medicaid enrollees. Nishida captures the discriminatory design built into the care worker/care partner relationship and the resulting antagonisms that make the situation tough to negotiate. Care workers are working in a system that already devalues their labor, partially because of who they are and who they care for. Care partners are invited into a system that allows them to think of their care workers as service providers, with the accompanying potential for racialized interactions with “the help.” Nishida traverses this tension well, but the complexity of the multiple power differentials in this arrangement is difficult to track and address with equity, begging the unanswered question of whether the shape of these multiple power imbalances is similar, a potential new line of inquiry this text might inspire. Just Care, in both content and form, embodies just care.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gender & Society
Gender & Society Multiple-
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
3.60%
发文量
78
期刊介绍: Gender & Society promotes feminist scholarship and the social scientific study of gender. Gender & Society publishes theoretically engaged and methodologically rigorous articles that make original contributions to gender theory. The journal takes a multidisciplinary, intersectional, and global approach to gender analyses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信