一直都在那里:理论化一个跨学科的社会研究

IF 0.7 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
E. Adams, Stacey Kerr
{"title":"一直都在那里:理论化一个跨学科的社会研究","authors":"E. Adams, Stacey Kerr","doi":"10.1080/1554480X.2020.1870470","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT While social studies is often referred to as either disciplinary or interdisciplinary, we explain why the term intra-disciplinary might be more appropriate. Specifically, we present new materialist definitions of the prefix intra- and theorize why it is productive to consider social studies concepts as simultaneously historic, geographic, economic, and civic, instead of discrete and separate disciplines. After presenting an overview of the field of social studies and concerns over disciplinary definitions and designations, we show how theory can be put into practice with descriptions of three activities we did with elementary and secondary-focused preservice teachers designed with an intra-disciplinary approach in mind. These activities include a walk through a local neighborhood, a trip to a nearby organic grocery store, and a field trip to the state art museum. Ultimately, we present an argument that the often separated social studies disciplines are always abundantly present in each other and that their continued separation narrows the scope of the field and restricts teachers' ability to create relevancy between classroom topics and the lives of students.","PeriodicalId":45770,"journal":{"name":"Pedagogies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1554480X.2020.1870470","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Always already there: theorizing an intra-disciplinary social studies\",\"authors\":\"E. Adams, Stacey Kerr\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1554480X.2020.1870470\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT While social studies is often referred to as either disciplinary or interdisciplinary, we explain why the term intra-disciplinary might be more appropriate. Specifically, we present new materialist definitions of the prefix intra- and theorize why it is productive to consider social studies concepts as simultaneously historic, geographic, economic, and civic, instead of discrete and separate disciplines. After presenting an overview of the field of social studies and concerns over disciplinary definitions and designations, we show how theory can be put into practice with descriptions of three activities we did with elementary and secondary-focused preservice teachers designed with an intra-disciplinary approach in mind. These activities include a walk through a local neighborhood, a trip to a nearby organic grocery store, and a field trip to the state art museum. Ultimately, we present an argument that the often separated social studies disciplines are always abundantly present in each other and that their continued separation narrows the scope of the field and restricts teachers' ability to create relevancy between classroom topics and the lives of students.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45770,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pedagogies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1554480X.2020.1870470\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pedagogies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480X.2020.1870470\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pedagogies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480X.2020.1870470","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

虽然社会研究通常被称为学科或跨学科,但我们解释为什么术语“学科内”可能更合适。具体来说,我们提出了前缀intra的新唯物主义定义,并理论化了为什么将社会研究概念同时视为历史、地理、经济和公民,而不是离散和独立的学科,是富有成效的。在概述了社会研究领域以及对学科定义和指定的关注之后,我们通过描述我们与以学科内方法设计的小学和中学为重点的职前教师进行的三项活动,展示了如何将理论付诸实践。这些活动包括在当地社区散步,去附近的有机食品杂货店,以及去州立艺术博物馆的实地考察。最后,我们提出了一个论点,即经常分离的社会研究学科总是彼此丰富地存在,并且它们的持续分离缩小了该领域的范围,限制了教师在课堂主题和学生生活之间建立相关性的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Always already there: theorizing an intra-disciplinary social studies
ABSTRACT While social studies is often referred to as either disciplinary or interdisciplinary, we explain why the term intra-disciplinary might be more appropriate. Specifically, we present new materialist definitions of the prefix intra- and theorize why it is productive to consider social studies concepts as simultaneously historic, geographic, economic, and civic, instead of discrete and separate disciplines. After presenting an overview of the field of social studies and concerns over disciplinary definitions and designations, we show how theory can be put into practice with descriptions of three activities we did with elementary and secondary-focused preservice teachers designed with an intra-disciplinary approach in mind. These activities include a walk through a local neighborhood, a trip to a nearby organic grocery store, and a field trip to the state art museum. Ultimately, we present an argument that the often separated social studies disciplines are always abundantly present in each other and that their continued separation narrows the scope of the field and restricts teachers' ability to create relevancy between classroom topics and the lives of students.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pedagogies
Pedagogies EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信