基于CBM评估系统的一年级阅读干预的教学特征

IF 1.9 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Joseph F. T. Nese, Dan Farley, Daniel Anderson
{"title":"基于CBM评估系统的一年级阅读干预的教学特征","authors":"Joseph F. T. Nese,&nbsp;Dan Farley,&nbsp;Daniel Anderson","doi":"10.1111/ldrp.12191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We used data from the 2014–2015 easyCBM assessment system to explore the applied reading intervention characteristics in a sample of 3,074 Grade 1 students (and 5,145 interventions) in school districts applying a multitiered systems of support (MTSS) framework. We describe the number of interventions, number of assessments, the intervention start dates, curricula, instructional strategies, tier, group size, frequency, dosage, total time, and quantitative intensity. We found variance across all instructional variables, with 156 curricula and 59 instructional strategies applied. Based on our data, a “typical” intervention was a Tier 2 intervention that began before October, was delivered for 30 minutes/day for 5 days/week in a group with three to five students, was changed once if at all, and student progress was most likely monitored with word reading fluency measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":47426,"journal":{"name":"Learning Disabilities Research & Practice","volume":"34 2","pages":"97-109"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/ldrp.12191","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Educator-Reported Instructional Characteristics of Grade 1 Reading Interventions within a CBM Assessment System\",\"authors\":\"Joseph F. T. Nese,&nbsp;Dan Farley,&nbsp;Daniel Anderson\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ldrp.12191\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>We used data from the 2014–2015 easyCBM assessment system to explore the applied reading intervention characteristics in a sample of 3,074 Grade 1 students (and 5,145 interventions) in school districts applying a multitiered systems of support (MTSS) framework. We describe the number of interventions, number of assessments, the intervention start dates, curricula, instructional strategies, tier, group size, frequency, dosage, total time, and quantitative intensity. We found variance across all instructional variables, with 156 curricula and 59 instructional strategies applied. Based on our data, a “typical” intervention was a Tier 2 intervention that began before October, was delivered for 30 minutes/day for 5 days/week in a group with three to five students, was changed once if at all, and student progress was most likely monitored with word reading fluency measures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47426,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Learning Disabilities Research & Practice\",\"volume\":\"34 2\",\"pages\":\"97-109\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/ldrp.12191\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Learning Disabilities Research & Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ldrp.12191\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning Disabilities Research & Practice","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ldrp.12191","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们利用2014-2015年easyCBM评估系统的数据,在采用多层支持系统(MTSS)框架的学区中,对3,074名一年级学生(和5,145项干预措施)的应用阅读干预特征进行了研究。我们描述了干预的数量、评估的数量、干预的开始日期、课程、教学策略、层次、小组规模、频率、剂量、总时间和定量强度。我们在156个课程和59个教学策略中发现了所有教学变量的差异。根据我们的数据,一个“典型的”干预是在10月之前开始的第二级干预,每天30分钟,每周5天,一组有3到5名学生,如果有的话,只改变一次,学生的进步很可能是通过单词阅读流畅性测量来监测的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Educator-Reported Instructional Characteristics of Grade 1 Reading Interventions within a CBM Assessment System

We used data from the 2014–2015 easyCBM assessment system to explore the applied reading intervention characteristics in a sample of 3,074 Grade 1 students (and 5,145 interventions) in school districts applying a multitiered systems of support (MTSS) framework. We describe the number of interventions, number of assessments, the intervention start dates, curricula, instructional strategies, tier, group size, frequency, dosage, total time, and quantitative intensity. We found variance across all instructional variables, with 156 curricula and 59 instructional strategies applied. Based on our data, a “typical” intervention was a Tier 2 intervention that began before October, was delivered for 30 minutes/day for 5 days/week in a group with three to five students, was changed once if at all, and student progress was most likely monitored with word reading fluency measures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
11.10%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信