康德的先验悲观主义与詹姆斯的经验Meliorism

IF 0.5 0 PHILOSOPHY
S. Pihlström
{"title":"康德的先验悲观主义与詹姆斯的经验Meliorism","authors":"S. Pihlström","doi":"10.5281/ZENODO.3864972","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Kant’s philosophy was an important background for the pragmatist tradition, even though  some of the major classical pragmatists, especially William James, were unwilling to acknowledge their debt to Kant. This essay considers the relation between Kant and James from the perspective of their conceptions of the human condition. In particular, I examine their sha red pessimism, employing Vanden Auweele’s (2019) recent analysis of Kant’s pessimism and arguing that this is required by James’s meliorism (which is put forward as  a middle-ground option between optimism and pessimism). A comparative inquiry into  Kant’s and James’s views on the relation between ethics and religion is provided against  this background of their shared philosophical anthropology.","PeriodicalId":41959,"journal":{"name":"Con-textos Kantianos-International Journal of Philosophy","volume":"1 1","pages":"313-335"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Kantian Transcendental Pessimism and Jamesian Empirical Meliorism\",\"authors\":\"S. Pihlström\",\"doi\":\"10.5281/ZENODO.3864972\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Kant’s philosophy was an important background for the pragmatist tradition, even though  some of the major classical pragmatists, especially William James, were unwilling to acknowledge their debt to Kant. This essay considers the relation between Kant and James from the perspective of their conceptions of the human condition. In particular, I examine their sha red pessimism, employing Vanden Auweele’s (2019) recent analysis of Kant’s pessimism and arguing that this is required by James’s meliorism (which is put forward as  a middle-ground option between optimism and pessimism). A comparative inquiry into  Kant’s and James’s views on the relation between ethics and religion is provided against  this background of their shared philosophical anthropology.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41959,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Con-textos Kantianos-International Journal of Philosophy\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"313-335\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Con-textos Kantianos-International Journal of Philosophy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.3864972\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Con-textos Kantianos-International Journal of Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.3864972","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

康德哲学是实用主义传统的重要背景,尽管一些主要的古典实用主义者,特别是威廉·詹姆斯,不愿意承认他们对康德的亏欠。本文从康德和詹姆斯的人的境遇观的角度来考察他们之间的关系。特别是,我运用Vanden Auweele(2019)最近对康德悲观主义的分析,研究了他们的悲观主义,并认为这是詹姆斯的改良主义(作为乐观主义和悲观主义之间的中间选择提出)所要求的。在康德和詹姆斯共同的哲学人类学背景下,对他们关于伦理与宗教关系的观点进行了比较研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Kantian Transcendental Pessimism and Jamesian Empirical Meliorism
Kant’s philosophy was an important background for the pragmatist tradition, even though  some of the major classical pragmatists, especially William James, were unwilling to acknowledge their debt to Kant. This essay considers the relation between Kant and James from the perspective of their conceptions of the human condition. In particular, I examine their sha red pessimism, employing Vanden Auweele’s (2019) recent analysis of Kant’s pessimism and arguing that this is required by James’s meliorism (which is put forward as  a middle-ground option between optimism and pessimism). A comparative inquiry into  Kant’s and James’s views on the relation between ethics and religion is provided against  this background of their shared philosophical anthropology.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Con-Textos Kantianos aims at boosting the philological and critical research on Kant studies, considering also actual discussions on Kant''s thought. That is the reason why its heading hints to contexts with texts. Kant shall be the main focus of the journal, which will tackle subjects such as Moral and Political Philosophy, History of Ideas, Philosophy of Right, Philosophy of History, Philosophy of Religion, Philosophy of Education, Aesthetics, Anthropology, Metaphysics and Epistemology, Human Rights, Social Policy, Theories of Justice and Cosmopolitanism. CTK aims at being an international and cosmopolitan inspired e-journal, where the Spanish language receives equal acknowledgement as English, French, German, Italian and Portuguese do. The main purposes of the journal are to enhance the development of a Kant scholarship network at the Latin American scale and to tighten the links between research groups already consolidated in different countries and languages. The editorial team, which gathers Kant scholars from Argentina, Colombia, Chile, Mexico and Spain, will certainly ease the fulfillment of both purposes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信