在科学与政治之间:唐纳德·皮尔森和对巴西科学社会学的追求

Q3 Social Sciences
M. C. Maio, Thiago da Costa Lopes
{"title":"在科学与政治之间:唐纳德·皮尔森和对巴西科学社会学的追求","authors":"M. C. Maio, Thiago da Costa Lopes","doi":"10.1590/18070337-110170en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper analyzes the political dimension embedded in the work of the American sociologist Donald Pierson in Brazil. A former student of Robert Park at the University of Chicago, Pierson played a major role in the institutionalization of the social sciences in Brazil from the 1930s through the 1950s. While Pierson’s intellectual ambitions were centered on an academic agenda and he defended a strict division between science and politics, we argue that a proper historical understanding of his endeavor can only be achieved through an analysis of his underlying assumptions about the nature of both science and society – assumptions that were rooted in a reformist, liberal-democratic understanding of the world. To bring to light these values, we examine two key moments in Pierson’s career: 1) his doctoral research on race relations in Bahia, done in the mid-1930s; 2) his efforts to promote the field of sociology in Brazil during the Good Neighbor Policy and World War II, when he was hired to teach at the São Paulo School of Sociology and Politics.","PeriodicalId":52478,"journal":{"name":"Sociologias","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Between Science and Politics: Donald Pierson and the quest for a scientific sociology in Brazil\",\"authors\":\"M. C. Maio, Thiago da Costa Lopes\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/18070337-110170en\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This paper analyzes the political dimension embedded in the work of the American sociologist Donald Pierson in Brazil. A former student of Robert Park at the University of Chicago, Pierson played a major role in the institutionalization of the social sciences in Brazil from the 1930s through the 1950s. While Pierson’s intellectual ambitions were centered on an academic agenda and he defended a strict division between science and politics, we argue that a proper historical understanding of his endeavor can only be achieved through an analysis of his underlying assumptions about the nature of both science and society – assumptions that were rooted in a reformist, liberal-democratic understanding of the world. To bring to light these values, we examine two key moments in Pierson’s career: 1) his doctoral research on race relations in Bahia, done in the mid-1930s; 2) his efforts to promote the field of sociology in Brazil during the Good Neighbor Policy and World War II, when he was hired to teach at the São Paulo School of Sociology and Politics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52478,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sociologias\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sociologias\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/18070337-110170en\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociologias","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/18070337-110170en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本文分析了美国社会学家唐纳德·皮尔森在巴西研究工作中的政治维度。皮尔森曾是芝加哥大学罗伯特·帕克(Robert Park)的学生,他在20世纪30年代至50年代巴西社会科学制度化的过程中发挥了重要作用。虽然皮尔逊的学术抱负集中在学术议程上,他为科学与政治之间的严格划分进行了辩护,但我们认为,对他的努力的正确历史理解只能通过分析他对科学和社会本质的基本假设来实现——这些假设植根于对世界的改革主义、自由民主的理解。为了揭示这些价值观,我们考察了皮尔逊职业生涯中的两个关键时刻:1)他在20世纪30年代中期在巴伊亚州进行的关于种族关系的博士研究;2)在“睦邻政策”和第二次世界大战期间,他受聘在圣保罗社会与政治学院任教,努力推动巴西社会学领域的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Between Science and Politics: Donald Pierson and the quest for a scientific sociology in Brazil
Abstract This paper analyzes the political dimension embedded in the work of the American sociologist Donald Pierson in Brazil. A former student of Robert Park at the University of Chicago, Pierson played a major role in the institutionalization of the social sciences in Brazil from the 1930s through the 1950s. While Pierson’s intellectual ambitions were centered on an academic agenda and he defended a strict division between science and politics, we argue that a proper historical understanding of his endeavor can only be achieved through an analysis of his underlying assumptions about the nature of both science and society – assumptions that were rooted in a reformist, liberal-democratic understanding of the world. To bring to light these values, we examine two key moments in Pierson’s career: 1) his doctoral research on race relations in Bahia, done in the mid-1930s; 2) his efforts to promote the field of sociology in Brazil during the Good Neighbor Policy and World War II, when he was hired to teach at the São Paulo School of Sociology and Politics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sociologias
Sociologias Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Sociologias is published biannually by the Post-Graduation Program in Sociology (PPG/Sociologia) of the Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), intending to promote interchange between national and foreign social scientists. The abbreviated title of the journal is Sociologias, which should be used in bibliographies, footnotes and bibliographical references and legends.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信