基于Flutter框架的国家管理在电子商务市场应用中的比较分析

Aditya Akhmad Dinan Jatnika, Muhammad Aminul Akbar, Aryo Pinandito
{"title":"基于Flutter框架的国家管理在电子商务市场应用中的比较分析","authors":"Aditya Akhmad Dinan Jatnika, Muhammad Aminul Akbar, Aryo Pinandito","doi":"10.25126/jitecs.202382557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aims to analyze the performance of two popular state management tools that have different system approaches, namely Riverpod and GetX, in developing marketplace applications using the Flutter framework. The marketplace type application used is Flutter ecommerce which is available as open source on the GitHub platform. This research aims to provide benefits to Flutter application developers in choosing the right state management tools for marketplace applications. The method used is to compare memory usage, execution time and CPU utilization of the two tools. Testing is done on the feature of displaying the home screen, search and add features. The results of the analysis obtained are that there are differences in memory usage and execution time for the three features and scenarios, GetX provides less memory usage with faster execution time. While in CPU utilization, there tends to be no performance difference between GetX and Riverpod. The conclusion is that GetX state management uses memory more efficiently and is able to provide faster execution time than Riverpod state management with better performance.","PeriodicalId":32903,"journal":{"name":"JITeCS Journal of Information Technology and Computer Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Analysis of the Use of State Management in E-commerce Marketplace Applications Using the Flutter Framework\",\"authors\":\"Aditya Akhmad Dinan Jatnika, Muhammad Aminul Akbar, Aryo Pinandito\",\"doi\":\"10.25126/jitecs.202382557\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research aims to analyze the performance of two popular state management tools that have different system approaches, namely Riverpod and GetX, in developing marketplace applications using the Flutter framework. The marketplace type application used is Flutter ecommerce which is available as open source on the GitHub platform. This research aims to provide benefits to Flutter application developers in choosing the right state management tools for marketplace applications. The method used is to compare memory usage, execution time and CPU utilization of the two tools. Testing is done on the feature of displaying the home screen, search and add features. The results of the analysis obtained are that there are differences in memory usage and execution time for the three features and scenarios, GetX provides less memory usage with faster execution time. While in CPU utilization, there tends to be no performance difference between GetX and Riverpod. The conclusion is that GetX state management uses memory more efficiently and is able to provide faster execution time than Riverpod state management with better performance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32903,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JITeCS Journal of Information Technology and Computer Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JITeCS Journal of Information Technology and Computer Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25126/jitecs.202382557\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JITeCS Journal of Information Technology and Computer Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25126/jitecs.202382557","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在分析两种流行的状态管理工具的性能,它们具有不同的系统方法,即Riverpod和GetX,在使用Flutter框架开发市场应用程序时。使用的市场类型应用程序是Flutter电子商务,它是GitHub平台上的开源应用程序。本研究旨在为Flutter应用程序开发人员在为市场应用程序选择正确的状态管理工具方面提供好处。使用的方法是比较这两个工具的内存使用情况、执行时间和CPU利用率。测试了主界面显示、搜索和添加功能。分析结果表明,这三种特性和场景在内存使用和执行时间上存在差异,GetX提供了更少的内存使用和更快的执行时间。而在CPU利用率方面,GetX和Riverpod之间往往没有性能差异。结论是,GetX状态管理比Riverpod状态管理更有效地使用内存,能够提供更快的执行时间和更好的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Analysis of the Use of State Management in E-commerce Marketplace Applications Using the Flutter Framework
This research aims to analyze the performance of two popular state management tools that have different system approaches, namely Riverpod and GetX, in developing marketplace applications using the Flutter framework. The marketplace type application used is Flutter ecommerce which is available as open source on the GitHub platform. This research aims to provide benefits to Flutter application developers in choosing the right state management tools for marketplace applications. The method used is to compare memory usage, execution time and CPU utilization of the two tools. Testing is done on the feature of displaying the home screen, search and add features. The results of the analysis obtained are that there are differences in memory usage and execution time for the three features and scenarios, GetX provides less memory usage with faster execution time. While in CPU utilization, there tends to be no performance difference between GetX and Riverpod. The conclusion is that GetX state management uses memory more efficiently and is able to provide faster execution time than Riverpod state management with better performance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信