了解间作制度对南非林波波省二氧化碳排放和土壤碳储量的影响

IF 1.5 Q2 AGRONOMY
T. Mogale, K. Ayisi, L. Munjonji, Yehenew G. Kifle, K. E. Mabitsela
{"title":"了解间作制度对南非林波波省二氧化碳排放和土壤碳储量的影响","authors":"T. Mogale, K. Ayisi, L. Munjonji, Yehenew G. Kifle, K. E. Mabitsela","doi":"10.1155/2023/6307673","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Understanding the carbon dioxide emission rates under different agricultural practices is a critical step in determining the role of agriculture in greenhouse gas emissions. One of the challenges in advocating for an intercropping system as a sustainable practice in the face of climate change is the lack of information on how much CO2 is emitted by the system. A factorial randomized complete block design study was set up at two distinct agroecological locations (Syferkuil and Ofcolaco) in the Limpopo Province of South Africa to investigate carbon dynamics in sorghum-cowpea intercropping and sole cropping system over two seasons. Intercropping system emitted less CO2 compared to sole cropping system. In 2018/19 at Syferkuil and 2020/21 at Ofcolaco, intercropping systems emitted 11% and 19% less CO2, respectively, than sole cropping systems. In both agroecological regions, low cowpea density consistently resulted in higher CO2 emissions than high density. During the 2018/19 cropping season, sorghum emitted more CO2 of 5.87 t·ha−1 than cowpea with 5.14 t·ha−1 in a sole cropping system at Syferkuil. Cowpea, on the other hand, emitted more CO2 of 6.5 t·ha−1 and 10.18 t·ha−1 than sorghum during the 2020/21 cropping season at Syferkuil and Ofcolaco, respectively. Furthermore, intercropping improved the carbon emission efficiency (CEE) of the individual crops in the system. The treatments used in the intercropping and sole cropping systems had a significant impact on the strength of the relationship between carbon stocks and CEE. Our results revealed that sorghum-cowpea intercropping system at a relatively higher cowpea density in a no-till system reduces the amount of CO2 lost to the atmosphere. The system can thus, be promoted as one of the sustainable farming practices to reduce emissions and improve carbon storage in the soil.","PeriodicalId":13844,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Agronomy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding the Impact of the Intercropping System on Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Emissions and Soil Carbon Stocks in Limpopo Province, South Africa\",\"authors\":\"T. Mogale, K. Ayisi, L. Munjonji, Yehenew G. Kifle, K. E. Mabitsela\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2023/6307673\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Understanding the carbon dioxide emission rates under different agricultural practices is a critical step in determining the role of agriculture in greenhouse gas emissions. One of the challenges in advocating for an intercropping system as a sustainable practice in the face of climate change is the lack of information on how much CO2 is emitted by the system. A factorial randomized complete block design study was set up at two distinct agroecological locations (Syferkuil and Ofcolaco) in the Limpopo Province of South Africa to investigate carbon dynamics in sorghum-cowpea intercropping and sole cropping system over two seasons. Intercropping system emitted less CO2 compared to sole cropping system. In 2018/19 at Syferkuil and 2020/21 at Ofcolaco, intercropping systems emitted 11% and 19% less CO2, respectively, than sole cropping systems. In both agroecological regions, low cowpea density consistently resulted in higher CO2 emissions than high density. During the 2018/19 cropping season, sorghum emitted more CO2 of 5.87 t·ha−1 than cowpea with 5.14 t·ha−1 in a sole cropping system at Syferkuil. Cowpea, on the other hand, emitted more CO2 of 6.5 t·ha−1 and 10.18 t·ha−1 than sorghum during the 2020/21 cropping season at Syferkuil and Ofcolaco, respectively. Furthermore, intercropping improved the carbon emission efficiency (CEE) of the individual crops in the system. The treatments used in the intercropping and sole cropping systems had a significant impact on the strength of the relationship between carbon stocks and CEE. Our results revealed that sorghum-cowpea intercropping system at a relatively higher cowpea density in a no-till system reduces the amount of CO2 lost to the atmosphere. The system can thus, be promoted as one of the sustainable farming practices to reduce emissions and improve carbon storage in the soil.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13844,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Agronomy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Agronomy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/6307673\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Agronomy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/6307673","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

了解不同农业实践下的二氧化碳排放率是确定农业在温室气体排放中的作用的关键一步。在气候变化面前,倡导间作系统作为一种可持续做法的挑战之一是缺乏关于该系统排放了多少二氧化碳的信息。在南非林波波省的两个不同的农业生态位置(Syferkuil和Ofcolaco)建立了一项因子随机完全区组设计研究,以调查高粱-豇豆间作和单作两个季节的碳动态。与单作系统相比,间作系统排放的二氧化碳更少。在Syferkuil的2018/19年和Ofcolaco的2020/21年,间作系统的二氧化碳排放量分别比单作系统少11%和19%。在这两个农业生态区,低密度豇豆的二氧化碳排放量始终高于高密度豇豆。2018/19年种植季节,高粱排放的二氧化碳更多,为5.87 t·ha−1比豇豆高5.14 t·ha−1。另一方面,豇豆排放的二氧化碳更多,为6.5 t·ha−1和10.18 在2020/21年的种植季节,Syferkuil和Ofcolaco的产量分别比高粱高出t·ha−1。此外,间作提高了系统中单个作物的碳排放效率。间作和单作系统中使用的处理对碳储量与CEE之间关系的强度有显著影响。我们的研究结果表明,在免耕系统中,高粱-豇豆间作系统在相对较高的豇豆密度下减少了大气中二氧化碳的损失。因此,该系统可以作为一种可持续的农业实践来推广,以减少排放并改善土壤中的碳储存。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Understanding the Impact of the Intercropping System on Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Emissions and Soil Carbon Stocks in Limpopo Province, South Africa
Understanding the carbon dioxide emission rates under different agricultural practices is a critical step in determining the role of agriculture in greenhouse gas emissions. One of the challenges in advocating for an intercropping system as a sustainable practice in the face of climate change is the lack of information on how much CO2 is emitted by the system. A factorial randomized complete block design study was set up at two distinct agroecological locations (Syferkuil and Ofcolaco) in the Limpopo Province of South Africa to investigate carbon dynamics in sorghum-cowpea intercropping and sole cropping system over two seasons. Intercropping system emitted less CO2 compared to sole cropping system. In 2018/19 at Syferkuil and 2020/21 at Ofcolaco, intercropping systems emitted 11% and 19% less CO2, respectively, than sole cropping systems. In both agroecological regions, low cowpea density consistently resulted in higher CO2 emissions than high density. During the 2018/19 cropping season, sorghum emitted more CO2 of 5.87 t·ha−1 than cowpea with 5.14 t·ha−1 in a sole cropping system at Syferkuil. Cowpea, on the other hand, emitted more CO2 of 6.5 t·ha−1 and 10.18 t·ha−1 than sorghum during the 2020/21 cropping season at Syferkuil and Ofcolaco, respectively. Furthermore, intercropping improved the carbon emission efficiency (CEE) of the individual crops in the system. The treatments used in the intercropping and sole cropping systems had a significant impact on the strength of the relationship between carbon stocks and CEE. Our results revealed that sorghum-cowpea intercropping system at a relatively higher cowpea density in a no-till system reduces the amount of CO2 lost to the atmosphere. The system can thus, be promoted as one of the sustainable farming practices to reduce emissions and improve carbon storage in the soil.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.30%
发文量
66
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信