当握手意味着什么:律师、交易达成和新好莱坞的出现

IF 0.7 2区 历史学 Q4 BUSINESS
Peter S. Labuza
{"title":"当握手意味着什么:律师、交易达成和新好莱坞的出现","authors":"Peter S. Labuza","doi":"10.1017/eso.2021.49","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Jack Warner loved shutting down films. It was tradition on the Warner Bros. lot, one he continued long after his three brothers departed the studio. As director Arthur Penn described it, “Warner would give a time frame and then come down to the set, no matter how far along they were, and say ‘Your picture wraps tonight.’”2 It was a display of power, a way to demonstrate who ran the studio.When it came to Bonnie and Clyde—a filmWarner hatedwith every bone in his body—he was overjoyed to finally force the hand of Penn and his coproducer/star Warren Beatty. Even though they were right on schedule, “The Colonel,” as many referred to Warner, barged his way into their wrap party and forced the crew to shoot the still photos that would be featured in the opening credits. Everyone was taken aback by Warner’s actions but felt forced to oblige. Penn caught the eye of Walter MacEwan, Warner’s right-hand man, who “stood behind Jack with a chagrined expression, as if to say, ‘What can I do?’”3 But Bonnie and Clyde was not Warner’s project to control. Before production began, the executives at Warner Bros. had negotiated a deal with Penn and Beatty. Their memo featured several brief but thoughtful stipulations that seemed agreeable to both sides.Most notably, the location of where to edit the picture would be arranged later by mutual agreement among the parties.4 Warner soon realized Penn and Beatty were shipping dailies to New York instead of the studio’s own editing bays and planning to edit the film without the possibility that the executive might barge through the doors. He fired off a memo, declaring, “I would not have gone throughwith this contract if I had known these uncalled gimmickswere in it.”5 But none of the studio’s executives could do anything to reverse it and please the Colonel. They had","PeriodicalId":45977,"journal":{"name":"Enterprise & Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"When A Handshake Meant Something: Lawyers, Deal Making, and the Emergence of New Hollywood\",\"authors\":\"Peter S. Labuza\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/eso.2021.49\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Jack Warner loved shutting down films. It was tradition on the Warner Bros. lot, one he continued long after his three brothers departed the studio. As director Arthur Penn described it, “Warner would give a time frame and then come down to the set, no matter how far along they were, and say ‘Your picture wraps tonight.’”2 It was a display of power, a way to demonstrate who ran the studio.When it came to Bonnie and Clyde—a filmWarner hatedwith every bone in his body—he was overjoyed to finally force the hand of Penn and his coproducer/star Warren Beatty. Even though they were right on schedule, “The Colonel,” as many referred to Warner, barged his way into their wrap party and forced the crew to shoot the still photos that would be featured in the opening credits. Everyone was taken aback by Warner’s actions but felt forced to oblige. Penn caught the eye of Walter MacEwan, Warner’s right-hand man, who “stood behind Jack with a chagrined expression, as if to say, ‘What can I do?’”3 But Bonnie and Clyde was not Warner’s project to control. Before production began, the executives at Warner Bros. had negotiated a deal with Penn and Beatty. Their memo featured several brief but thoughtful stipulations that seemed agreeable to both sides.Most notably, the location of where to edit the picture would be arranged later by mutual agreement among the parties.4 Warner soon realized Penn and Beatty were shipping dailies to New York instead of the studio’s own editing bays and planning to edit the film without the possibility that the executive might barge through the doors. He fired off a memo, declaring, “I would not have gone throughwith this contract if I had known these uncalled gimmickswere in it.”5 But none of the studio’s executives could do anything to reverse it and please the Colonel. They had\",\"PeriodicalId\":45977,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Enterprise & Society\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Enterprise & Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/eso.2021.49\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Enterprise & Society","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/eso.2021.49","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

杰克·华纳喜欢关闭电影。这是华纳兄弟公司的传统,在他的三个兄弟离开工作室后很长一段时间,他一直延续着这一传统。正如导演亚瑟·佩恩(Arthur Penn)所描述的那样,“华纳会给出一个时间框架,然后走到片场,不管他们走了多远,然后说‘你的照片今晚就结束了’。”2这是一种力量的展示,是一种展示谁管理工作室的方式。当谈到《邦妮和克莱德》时,华纳公司对这部电影恨之入骨,他欣喜若狂,终于说服了佩恩和他的合作制片人/主演沃伦·比蒂。尽管他们的计划是正确的,但正如许多人所说的华纳,“上校”闯入了他们的总结派对,并强迫剧组拍摄将在片头字幕中出现的静态照片。所有人都被华纳的行为吓了一跳,但都觉得有义务这么做。佩恩引起了华纳的得力助手沃尔特·麦克尤恩的注意,他“站在杰克身后,一副懊恼的表情,好像在说,‘我能做什么?’”3但邦妮和克莱德不是华纳要控制的项目。在制作开始之前,华纳兄弟公司的高管们已经与佩恩和贝蒂谈判达成了一项协议。他们的备忘录中有几个简短但深思熟虑的规定,似乎双方都很满意。最值得注意的是,剪辑电影的地点将由双方协商后安排。4华纳很快意识到,佩恩和贝蒂正在将日报运到纽约,而不是工作室自己的剪辑间,并计划在没有高管闯入的情况下剪辑电影。他发布了一份备忘录,宣称:“如果我知道这份合同中有这些不必要的噱头,我就不会完成这份合同。”5但工作室的高管们都无法扭转这一局面,取悦上校。他们
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
When A Handshake Meant Something: Lawyers, Deal Making, and the Emergence of New Hollywood
Jack Warner loved shutting down films. It was tradition on the Warner Bros. lot, one he continued long after his three brothers departed the studio. As director Arthur Penn described it, “Warner would give a time frame and then come down to the set, no matter how far along they were, and say ‘Your picture wraps tonight.’”2 It was a display of power, a way to demonstrate who ran the studio.When it came to Bonnie and Clyde—a filmWarner hatedwith every bone in his body—he was overjoyed to finally force the hand of Penn and his coproducer/star Warren Beatty. Even though they were right on schedule, “The Colonel,” as many referred to Warner, barged his way into their wrap party and forced the crew to shoot the still photos that would be featured in the opening credits. Everyone was taken aback by Warner’s actions but felt forced to oblige. Penn caught the eye of Walter MacEwan, Warner’s right-hand man, who “stood behind Jack with a chagrined expression, as if to say, ‘What can I do?’”3 But Bonnie and Clyde was not Warner’s project to control. Before production began, the executives at Warner Bros. had negotiated a deal with Penn and Beatty. Their memo featured several brief but thoughtful stipulations that seemed agreeable to both sides.Most notably, the location of where to edit the picture would be arranged later by mutual agreement among the parties.4 Warner soon realized Penn and Beatty were shipping dailies to New York instead of the studio’s own editing bays and planning to edit the film without the possibility that the executive might barge through the doors. He fired off a memo, declaring, “I would not have gone throughwith this contract if I had known these uncalled gimmickswere in it.”5 But none of the studio’s executives could do anything to reverse it and please the Colonel. They had
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
30.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: Enterprise & Society offers a forum for research on the historical relations between businesses and their larger political, cultural, institutional, social, and economic contexts. The journal aims to be truly international in scope. Studies focused on individual firms and industries and grounded in a broad historical framework are welcome, as are innovative applications of economic or management theories to business and its context.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信