米哈伊洛·康斯坦丁诺维奇对正确答案的滥用。作为奖励,我对反应研究所的了解

Vladimir V. Vodinelić
{"title":"米哈伊洛·康斯坦丁诺维奇对正确答案的滥用。作为奖励,我对反应研究所的了解","authors":"Vladimir V. Vodinelić","doi":"10.51204/anali_pfbu_22mk08a","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mihailo Konstantinović authored the region’s first monography on right of reply in 1926–1927. His monography promoted the French model of right to reply, as opposed to the German model adopted in local literature, the courts and legislation. He argued that French solution was stricter for the press, but less stringent for a rights holder. He defended the position of the relative nature of right, which could be controlled by implementation of the abuse of right doctrine. The author analyzes: the suitability of the terms réponse and others; rights close to right of reply; the purpose and nature of right of reply; exceptions to the right and prohibition of abuse of rights as subsidiary exception; the special place of right of reply among another subjective rights; right of reply not corresponding to legal binary code, representing a juncture of law and legal indifference; possessory protection vs. personality protection through reply.","PeriodicalId":32310,"journal":{"name":"Anali Pravnog Fakulteta u Beogradu","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mihailo Konstantinović o pravu odgovora i zloupotrebi prava odgovora. A kao bonus: moje razumevanje instituta odgovora\",\"authors\":\"Vladimir V. Vodinelić\",\"doi\":\"10.51204/anali_pfbu_22mk08a\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Mihailo Konstantinović authored the region’s first monography on right of reply in 1926–1927. His monography promoted the French model of right to reply, as opposed to the German model adopted in local literature, the courts and legislation. He argued that French solution was stricter for the press, but less stringent for a rights holder. He defended the position of the relative nature of right, which could be controlled by implementation of the abuse of right doctrine. The author analyzes: the suitability of the terms réponse and others; rights close to right of reply; the purpose and nature of right of reply; exceptions to the right and prohibition of abuse of rights as subsidiary exception; the special place of right of reply among another subjective rights; right of reply not corresponding to legal binary code, representing a juncture of law and legal indifference; possessory protection vs. personality protection through reply.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32310,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anali Pravnog Fakulteta u Beogradu\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anali Pravnog Fakulteta u Beogradu\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51204/anali_pfbu_22mk08a\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anali Pravnog Fakulteta u Beogradu","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51204/anali_pfbu_22mk08a","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

米哈伊洛·康斯坦丁诺维奇于1926年至1927年撰写了该地区第一本关于答辩权的专著。他的专著提倡法国的答辩权模式,而不是当地文学、法院和立法中采用的德国模式。他认为,法国的解决方案对媒体更严格,但对权利持有人来说不那么严格。他为权利相对性质的立场进行了辩护,权利相对性质可以通过实施滥用权利原则来控制。作者分析了“回应”等术语的适用性;接近答辩权的权利;答辩权的目的和性质;权利例外和禁止滥用权利作为附属例外;答辩权在其他主观权利中的特殊地位;答辩权与法律二元代码不对应,代表着法律与法律冷漠的交汇点;占有式保护与通过答复的人格保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mihailo Konstantinović o pravu odgovora i zloupotrebi prava odgovora. A kao bonus: moje razumevanje instituta odgovora
Mihailo Konstantinović authored the region’s first monography on right of reply in 1926–1927. His monography promoted the French model of right to reply, as opposed to the German model adopted in local literature, the courts and legislation. He argued that French solution was stricter for the press, but less stringent for a rights holder. He defended the position of the relative nature of right, which could be controlled by implementation of the abuse of right doctrine. The author analyzes: the suitability of the terms réponse and others; rights close to right of reply; the purpose and nature of right of reply; exceptions to the right and prohibition of abuse of rights as subsidiary exception; the special place of right of reply among another subjective rights; right of reply not corresponding to legal binary code, representing a juncture of law and legal indifference; possessory protection vs. personality protection through reply.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
3 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信