麻风的敏感性损害:一项纵向和回顾性研究

A. Castanheira, S. Bandeira, A. Chichester, A. L. Reis, C. Nascimento, Caroline da Silva Alves Palheta, W. Loureiro, F. Carneiro, C. Pires
{"title":"麻风的敏感性损害:一项纵向和回顾性研究","authors":"A. Castanheira, S. Bandeira, A. Chichester, A. L. Reis, C. Nascimento, Caroline da Silva Alves Palheta, W. Loureiro, F. Carneiro, C. Pires","doi":"10.3823/2618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The evaluation of leprosy patients requires a careful dermatological and neurological examination in order to monitor the possible damage to the peripheral nerves. This study focused on evaluate the sensitivity at the time of diagnosis and discharge of leprosy patients from Dermatology Department of the State University of the State of Para.   \nMethods and Findings: this is a longitudinal, retrospective and descriptive study based on medical records that presented neurological assessment and degree of physical disability of 30 patients assisted at a referral service between 2016 and 2019, applying descriptive statistical analysis. Concerning neural involvement, 88.89% of the patients with neural damage were male, 100% of patients in this group were multibacillary (p-value: 0.02), 42.8% were borderliners (p-value: 0.04), 88.8% had some type of leprosy reaction (p-value: 0.02) and 44.4% of the patients had a diagnosis of leprosy with more than one year of disease evolution; most patients with neural involvement (N = 16) had more than one nerve affected, with the right tibial nerve being the most affected (24.14%); It was noted that a considerable portion of multibacillary patients did not improve or worsened (75%), and the borderline form was the one with the worst prognosis, showing 50% of patients did not respond to treatment. \nConclusions: Most of the patients with neural damage were multibacillary, and borderliners, with many of those without presenting improvement, or showing worsening of clinical condition after multidrug therapy. Thus, it is highlighted the primary role of longitudinal assessment of those patients, in view of the possibility of chronification and sequel development.","PeriodicalId":73409,"journal":{"name":"International archives of medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sensitive Damage in Leprosy: A Longitudinal and Retrospective Study\",\"authors\":\"A. Castanheira, S. Bandeira, A. Chichester, A. L. Reis, C. Nascimento, Caroline da Silva Alves Palheta, W. Loureiro, F. Carneiro, C. Pires\",\"doi\":\"10.3823/2618\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The evaluation of leprosy patients requires a careful dermatological and neurological examination in order to monitor the possible damage to the peripheral nerves. This study focused on evaluate the sensitivity at the time of diagnosis and discharge of leprosy patients from Dermatology Department of the State University of the State of Para.   \\nMethods and Findings: this is a longitudinal, retrospective and descriptive study based on medical records that presented neurological assessment and degree of physical disability of 30 patients assisted at a referral service between 2016 and 2019, applying descriptive statistical analysis. Concerning neural involvement, 88.89% of the patients with neural damage were male, 100% of patients in this group were multibacillary (p-value: 0.02), 42.8% were borderliners (p-value: 0.04), 88.8% had some type of leprosy reaction (p-value: 0.02) and 44.4% of the patients had a diagnosis of leprosy with more than one year of disease evolution; most patients with neural involvement (N = 16) had more than one nerve affected, with the right tibial nerve being the most affected (24.14%); It was noted that a considerable portion of multibacillary patients did not improve or worsened (75%), and the borderline form was the one with the worst prognosis, showing 50% of patients did not respond to treatment. \\nConclusions: Most of the patients with neural damage were multibacillary, and borderliners, with many of those without presenting improvement, or showing worsening of clinical condition after multidrug therapy. Thus, it is highlighted the primary role of longitudinal assessment of those patients, in view of the possibility of chronification and sequel development.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73409,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International archives of medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-02-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International archives of medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3823/2618\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International archives of medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3823/2618","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:麻风病患者的评估需要仔细的皮肤科和神经科检查,以监测周围神经可能受到的损伤。本研究的重点是评估帕拉州州立大学皮肤科麻风患者在诊断和出院时的敏感性。方法和发现:这是一项基于医疗记录的纵向、回顾性和描述性研究,采用描述性统计分析,对2016年至2019年间接受转诊服务的30名患者进行了神经评估和身体残疾程度。在神经受累方面,88.89%的神经损伤患者为男性,该组患者中100%为多发性(p值:0.02),42.8%为无边界者(p值为0.04),88.8%有某种类型的麻风病反应(p值是0.02),44.4%的患者诊断为麻风病并有一年以上的疾病演变;大多数神经受累患者(N=16)有一条以上神经受累,其中右胫神经受累最多(24.14%);值得注意的是,相当一部分多乳头患者没有改善或恶化(75%),临界型是预后最差的一种,显示50%的患者对治疗没有反应。结论:大多数神经损伤患者都是多发性和边缘型患者,其中许多患者在多药治疗后没有改善,或临床状况恶化。因此,鉴于慢性化和后续发展的可能性,强调了对这些患者进行纵向评估的主要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sensitive Damage in Leprosy: A Longitudinal and Retrospective Study
Background: The evaluation of leprosy patients requires a careful dermatological and neurological examination in order to monitor the possible damage to the peripheral nerves. This study focused on evaluate the sensitivity at the time of diagnosis and discharge of leprosy patients from Dermatology Department of the State University of the State of Para.   Methods and Findings: this is a longitudinal, retrospective and descriptive study based on medical records that presented neurological assessment and degree of physical disability of 30 patients assisted at a referral service between 2016 and 2019, applying descriptive statistical analysis. Concerning neural involvement, 88.89% of the patients with neural damage were male, 100% of patients in this group were multibacillary (p-value: 0.02), 42.8% were borderliners (p-value: 0.04), 88.8% had some type of leprosy reaction (p-value: 0.02) and 44.4% of the patients had a diagnosis of leprosy with more than one year of disease evolution; most patients with neural involvement (N = 16) had more than one nerve affected, with the right tibial nerve being the most affected (24.14%); It was noted that a considerable portion of multibacillary patients did not improve or worsened (75%), and the borderline form was the one with the worst prognosis, showing 50% of patients did not respond to treatment. Conclusions: Most of the patients with neural damage were multibacillary, and borderliners, with many of those without presenting improvement, or showing worsening of clinical condition after multidrug therapy. Thus, it is highlighted the primary role of longitudinal assessment of those patients, in view of the possibility of chronification and sequel development.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信