社会效能与社会结果期望量表的进一步验证

IF 1.5 4区心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL

Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1177/07342829231198277

Stephen L. Wright, Michael A. Jenkins-Guarnieri

{"title":"社会效能与社会结果期望量表的进一步验证","authors":"Stephen L. Wright, Michael A. Jenkins-Guarnieri","doi":"10.1177/07342829231198277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current study sought out to advance the Social Self-Efficacy and Social Outcome Expectations scale using multiple approaches to scale development. Data from 583 undergraduate students were used in two scale development approaches: Classic Test Theory (CTT) and Item Response Theory (IRT). Confirmatory factor analysis suggested a 2-factor structure that aligns with the theoretically based domains for SEOES items and supports previously proposed models of this scale from CTT and psychometric analyses. The IRT analysis indicated that the SEOES items have greater measurement precision at measuring lower levels of the latent constructs. Future research directions are provided and practice implications are discussed.","PeriodicalId":51446,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Further Validation of the Social Efficacy and Social Outcome Expectations Scale\",\"authors\":\"Stephen L. Wright, Michael A. Jenkins-Guarnieri\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/07342829231198277\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The current study sought out to advance the Social Self-Efficacy and Social Outcome Expectations scale using multiple approaches to scale development. Data from 583 undergraduate students were used in two scale development approaches: Classic Test Theory (CTT) and Item Response Theory (IRT). Confirmatory factor analysis suggested a 2-factor structure that aligns with the theoretically based domains for SEOES items and supports previously proposed models of this scale from CTT and psychometric analyses. The IRT analysis indicated that the SEOES items have greater measurement precision at measuring lower levels of the latent constructs. Future research directions are provided and practice implications are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51446,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/07342829231198277\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07342829231198277","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究试图采用多种方法对社会自我效能感和社会结果期望量表进行编制。以583名大学生为研究对象，采用经典测试理论(CTT)和项目反应理论(IRT)两种量表开发方法。验证性因子分析提出了一个双因子结构，该结构与SEOES项目的理论基础领域一致，并支持先前从CTT和心理测量分析中提出的该量表模型。IRT分析表明，在测量较低水平的潜在构念时，SEOES项目具有较高的测量精度。展望了未来的研究方向和实践意义。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Further Validation of the Social Efficacy and Social Outcome Expectations Scale

The current study sought out to advance the Social Self-Efficacy and Social Outcome Expectations scale using multiple approaches to scale development. Data from 583 undergraduate students were used in two scale development approaches: Classic Test Theory (CTT) and Item Response Theory (IRT). Confirmatory factor analysis suggested a 2-factor structure that aligns with the theoretically based domains for SEOES items and supports previously proposed models of this scale from CTT and psychometric analyses. The IRT analysis indicated that the SEOES items have greater measurement precision at measuring lower levels of the latent constructs. Future research directions are provided and practice implications are discussed.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-

CiteScore

3.30

自引率

5.90%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment (JPA) publishes contemporary and important information focusing on psychological and educational assessment research and evidence-based practices as well as assessment instrumentation. JPA is well known internationally for the quality of published assessment-related research, theory and practice papers, and book and test reviews. The methodologically sound and impiricially-based studies and critical test and book reviews will be of particular interest to all assessment specialists including practicing psychologists, psychoeducational consultants, educational diagnosticians and special educators.