状态反刍的实验诱导:以运动员为样本评估目标提示任务效果的研究

IF 1.6 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY

Cogent Psychology Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI:10.1080/23311908.2023.2205252

Alena Michel-Kröhler, S. Berti

{"title":"状态反刍的实验诱导:以运动员为样本评估目标提示任务效果的研究","authors":"Alena Michel-Kröhler, S. Berti","doi":"10.1080/23311908.2023.2205252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Athletes’ behavior, thoughts, and feelings are influenced by whether athletes achieve their personal goals or not. The present experiment aimed to evaluate the application of a paradigm that uses unresolved goals to elicit state rumination in athletes. For this purpose, 101 athletes (f = 53, m= 48, Mage = 22.40, SDage = 2.80) participated in an experiment and were divided into three different conditions – two experimental and one control condition. Using a 3 × 3 mixed ANOVA, we examined (1) whether we could significantly elicit rumination in athletes with a goal-related procedure (2) whether the context in which goals were formulated (general, sport-specific) mattered, and (3) whether the application of the procedure had an impact on performance as well as on cognitive processes in a subsequent go/no-go task. In addition, we assessed also athletes’ mood as well as their affect to account for emotional processes in addition to cognitive ones. Results showed that regardless of context, cueing unresolved goals resulted in a significant increase in state rumination after the paradigm compared to the control condition and subsequent recovery during the go/no-go task. In addition, only temporal changes in athletes’ mood and affect were evident; group differences were largely absent. Approaches for future research and further application in the sports context are discussed.","PeriodicalId":46323,"journal":{"name":"Cogent Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experimental induction of state rumination: A study evaluating the efficacy of goal-cueing task in a sample of athletes\",\"authors\":\"Alena Michel-Kröhler, S. Berti\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23311908.2023.2205252\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Athletes’ behavior, thoughts, and feelings are influenced by whether athletes achieve their personal goals or not. The present experiment aimed to evaluate the application of a paradigm that uses unresolved goals to elicit state rumination in athletes. For this purpose, 101 athletes (f = 53, m= 48, Mage = 22.40, SDage = 2.80) participated in an experiment and were divided into three different conditions – two experimental and one control condition. Using a 3 × 3 mixed ANOVA, we examined (1) whether we could significantly elicit rumination in athletes with a goal-related procedure (2) whether the context in which goals were formulated (general, sport-specific) mattered, and (3) whether the application of the procedure had an impact on performance as well as on cognitive processes in a subsequent go/no-go task. In addition, we assessed also athletes’ mood as well as their affect to account for emotional processes in addition to cognitive ones. Results showed that regardless of context, cueing unresolved goals resulted in a significant increase in state rumination after the paradigm compared to the control condition and subsequent recovery during the go/no-go task. In addition, only temporal changes in athletes’ mood and affect were evident; group differences were largely absent. Approaches for future research and further application in the sports context are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46323,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cogent Psychology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cogent Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2023.2205252\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cogent Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2023.2205252","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Experimental induction of state rumination: A study evaluating the efficacy of goal-cueing task in a sample of athletes

Abstract Athletes’ behavior, thoughts, and feelings are influenced by whether athletes achieve their personal goals or not. The present experiment aimed to evaluate the application of a paradigm that uses unresolved goals to elicit state rumination in athletes. For this purpose, 101 athletes (f = 53, m= 48, Mage = 22.40, SDage = 2.80) participated in an experiment and were divided into three different conditions – two experimental and one control condition. Using a 3 × 3 mixed ANOVA, we examined (1) whether we could significantly elicit rumination in athletes with a goal-related procedure (2) whether the context in which goals were formulated (general, sport-specific) mattered, and (3) whether the application of the procedure had an impact on performance as well as on cognitive processes in a subsequent go/no-go task. In addition, we assessed also athletes’ mood as well as their affect to account for emotional processes in addition to cognitive ones. Results showed that regardless of context, cueing unresolved goals resulted in a significant increase in state rumination after the paradigm compared to the control condition and subsequent recovery during the go/no-go task. In addition, only temporal changes in athletes’ mood and affect were evident; group differences were largely absent. Approaches for future research and further application in the sports context are discussed.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Cogent Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-

CiteScore

2.90

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

12 weeks

期刊介绍： One of the largest multidisciplinary open access journals serving the psychology community, Cogent Psychology provides a home for scientifically sound peer-reviewed research. Part of Taylor & Francis / Routledge, the journal provides authors with fast peer review and publication and, through open access publishing, endeavours to help authors share their knowledge with the world. Cogent Psychology particularly encourages interdisciplinary studies and also accepts replication studies and negative results. Cogent Psychology covers a broad range of topics and welcomes submissions in all areas of psychology, ranging from social psychology to neuroscience, and everything in between. Led by Editor-in-Chief Professor Peter Walla of Webster Private University, Austria, and supported by an expert editorial team from institutions across the globe, Cogent Psychology provides our authors with comprehensive and quality peer review. Rather than accepting manuscripts based on their level of importance or impact, editors assess manuscripts objectively, accepting valid, scientific research with sound rigorous methodology. Article-level metrics let the research speak for itself.