从意义和指称的概念到原型的概念

IF 0.3 4区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Onomazein Pub Date : 2020-09-01 DOI:10.7764/onomazein.49.04
Carlos Assunção, C. Araújo, Gonçalo Fernandes
{"title":"从意义和指称的概念到原型的概念","authors":"Carlos Assunção, C. Araújo, Gonçalo Fernandes","doi":"10.7764/onomazein.49.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Meaning is a uniquely human phenomenon. In linguistics, this subject matter is especially complex, considering the multiplicity of theoretical approaches and the variety of disciplinary fields that address the issue. A similar concern applies to the concept of reference, \nbecause, although most linguists today agree that meaning and reference form two different realities, the discussion about the relation between these two terms has not yet been fully examined. \nCognitive Linguistics has made a great contribution to this discussion by recognizing that we cannot present the postulate of the existence of a level of meaning that belongs only to language and is distinct from the level at which the meaning of linguistic forms is associated \nwith the knowledge of the world. \nThe objective of this work is to show that, with Cognitive Linguistics, the ideas of meaning and reference are re-equated and have gained strength in the scope of linguistic studies reinforced by the concept of prototype. For such purpose this text describes the way these concepts have evolved based on their theorisation, paying particular attention to cognitive semantics, but not intending to make an exhaustive theoretical-methodological analysis of them.","PeriodicalId":44966,"journal":{"name":"Onomazein","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From the concepts of meaning and reference to the concept of prototypicality\",\"authors\":\"Carlos Assunção, C. Araújo, Gonçalo Fernandes\",\"doi\":\"10.7764/onomazein.49.04\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Meaning is a uniquely human phenomenon. In linguistics, this subject matter is especially complex, considering the multiplicity of theoretical approaches and the variety of disciplinary fields that address the issue. A similar concern applies to the concept of reference, \\nbecause, although most linguists today agree that meaning and reference form two different realities, the discussion about the relation between these two terms has not yet been fully examined. \\nCognitive Linguistics has made a great contribution to this discussion by recognizing that we cannot present the postulate of the existence of a level of meaning that belongs only to language and is distinct from the level at which the meaning of linguistic forms is associated \\nwith the knowledge of the world. \\nThe objective of this work is to show that, with Cognitive Linguistics, the ideas of meaning and reference are re-equated and have gained strength in the scope of linguistic studies reinforced by the concept of prototype. For such purpose this text describes the way these concepts have evolved based on their theorisation, paying particular attention to cognitive semantics, but not intending to make an exhaustive theoretical-methodological analysis of them.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44966,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Onomazein\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Onomazein\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7764/onomazein.49.04\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Onomazein","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7764/onomazein.49.04","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

意义是一种独特的人类现象。在语言学中,考虑到处理这个问题的理论方法的多样性和学科领域的多样性,这个主题尤其复杂。类似的担忧也适用于指称的概念,因为尽管今天大多数语言学家都认为意义和指称形成了两种不同的现实,但关于这两个术语之间关系的讨论尚未得到充分的研究。认知语言学对这一讨论做出了巨大贡献,因为我们认识到,我们不能提出一个只属于语言的意义水平存在的假设,而这个意义水平不同于语言形式的意义与世界知识相联系的水平。这项工作的目的是表明,在认知语言学中,意义和指称的概念被重新等同起来,并在原型概念强化的语言学研究范围内获得了力量。为此,本文描述了这些概念在其理论化的基础上的演变方式,特别关注认知语义,但不打算对其进行详尽的理论方法分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
From the concepts of meaning and reference to the concept of prototypicality
Meaning is a uniquely human phenomenon. In linguistics, this subject matter is especially complex, considering the multiplicity of theoretical approaches and the variety of disciplinary fields that address the issue. A similar concern applies to the concept of reference, because, although most linguists today agree that meaning and reference form two different realities, the discussion about the relation between these two terms has not yet been fully examined. Cognitive Linguistics has made a great contribution to this discussion by recognizing that we cannot present the postulate of the existence of a level of meaning that belongs only to language and is distinct from the level at which the meaning of linguistic forms is associated with the knowledge of the world. The objective of this work is to show that, with Cognitive Linguistics, the ideas of meaning and reference are re-equated and have gained strength in the scope of linguistic studies reinforced by the concept of prototype. For such purpose this text describes the way these concepts have evolved based on their theorisation, paying particular attention to cognitive semantics, but not intending to make an exhaustive theoretical-methodological analysis of them.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Onomazein
Onomazein Multiple-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信