取消引用“明显不准确”信息的权利:TU, RE和谷歌

Q2 Social Sciences

Journal of Media Law Pub Date : 2023-01-02 DOI:10.1080/17577632.2023.2215412

Laroussi Chemlali, Leila Benseddik

{"title":"取消引用“明显不准确”信息的权利:TU, RE和谷歌","authors":"Laroussi Chemlali, Leila Benseddik","doi":"10.1080/17577632.2023.2215412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT On 8 December 2022, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) issued a judgment in case TU, RE v Google (C-460/20) as a step forward in shaping the right to de-referencing. After an overview of the previous CJEU’s case-law on the right to de-referencing, the present note gives insights into the findings of the CJEU regarding both the de-referencing of allegedly inaccurate content by the search engine operators, and the de-referencing of photographs displayed in the form of thumbnails. Regarding the dereferencing of online content, the CJEU held that such dereferencing must be granted when the data subject proves a manifest inaccuracy without the need for a judicial decision. As for the dereferencing of thumbnails, their informative value should be taken into account regardless of the original context of their publication.","PeriodicalId":37779,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Media Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The right to de-referencing ‘manifestly inaccurate’ information: TU, RE v Google\",\"authors\":\"Laroussi Chemlali, Leila Benseddik\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17577632.2023.2215412\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT On 8 December 2022, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) issued a judgment in case TU, RE v Google (C-460/20) as a step forward in shaping the right to de-referencing. After an overview of the previous CJEU’s case-law on the right to de-referencing, the present note gives insights into the findings of the CJEU regarding both the de-referencing of allegedly inaccurate content by the search engine operators, and the de-referencing of photographs displayed in the form of thumbnails. Regarding the dereferencing of online content, the CJEU held that such dereferencing must be granted when the data subject proves a manifest inaccuracy without the need for a judicial decision. As for the dereferencing of thumbnails, their informative value should be taken into account regardless of the original context of their publication.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37779,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Media Law\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Media Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17577632.2023.2215412\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Media Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17577632.2023.2215412","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要2022年12月8日，欧盟法院对TU，RE诉谷歌案（C-460/20）作出判决，认为这是在形成去引用权方面迈出的一步。在概述了先前欧盟法院关于取消引用权的判例法之后，本说明深入了解了欧盟法院关于搜索引擎运营商取消引用据称不准确的内容和取消引用以缩略图形式显示的照片的调查结果。关于取消对在线内容的引用，欧盟法院认为，当数据主体证明明显不准确时，必须批准此类取消引用，而无需司法裁决。至于缩略图的取消引用，无论其发布的原始上下文如何，都应考虑其信息价值。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The right to de-referencing ‘manifestly inaccurate’ information: TU, RE v Google

ABSTRACT On 8 December 2022, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) issued a judgment in case TU, RE v Google (C-460/20) as a step forward in shaping the right to de-referencing. After an overview of the previous CJEU’s case-law on the right to de-referencing, the present note gives insights into the findings of the CJEU regarding both the de-referencing of allegedly inaccurate content by the search engine operators, and the de-referencing of photographs displayed in the form of thumbnails. Regarding the dereferencing of online content, the CJEU held that such dereferencing must be granted when the data subject proves a manifest inaccuracy without the need for a judicial decision. As for the dereferencing of thumbnails, their informative value should be taken into account regardless of the original context of their publication.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Media Law Social Sciences-Law

CiteScore

0.90

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The only platform for focused, rigorous analysis of global developments in media law, this peer-reviewed journal, launched in Summer 2009, is: essential for teaching and research, essential for practice, essential for policy-making. It turns the spotlight on all those aspects of law which impinge on and shape modern media practices - from regulation and ownership, to libel law and constitutional aspects of broadcasting such as free speech and privacy, obscenity laws, copyright, piracy, and other aspects of IT law. The result is the first journal to take a serious view of law through the lens. The first issues feature articles on a wide range of topics such as: Developments in Defamation · Balancing Freedom of Expression and Privacy in the European Court of Human Rights · The Future of Public Television · Cameras in the Courtroom - Media Access to Classified Documents · Advertising Revenue v Editorial Independence · Gordon Ramsay: Obscenity Regulation Pioneer?