否认帝国

Q3 Social Sciences
S. Mendelsohn
{"title":"否认帝国","authors":"S. Mendelsohn","doi":"10.1080/15240657.2021.1996738","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT By reconsidering the supposedly failed encounter between the French psychoanalyst Octave Mannoni and the race critic and psychiatrist Frantz Fanon, this article readdresses the Freudian concept of denial and the way it can be used as a powerful analyzer of the persistence of racism. Supporting both the libidinal fixation through the making up of a fetish, and the ego splitting between knowledge and belief, denial reveals itself to be one of the consistent means by which imperialism maintains itself after the loss of an Empire. Preventing political and subjective decolonization by sustaining jouissance (enjoyment), the paradoxical way conceived by Lacan to theorize how the subject tries to encounter and escape his/her own ontological fragility, denial is here considered itself as an Empire, insofar as it allows the subject of the unconscious to remain alienated to colonial ideals and to benefit from that, even if in ambiguous ways.","PeriodicalId":39339,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Gender and Sexuality","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Empire of Denial\",\"authors\":\"S. Mendelsohn\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15240657.2021.1996738\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT By reconsidering the supposedly failed encounter between the French psychoanalyst Octave Mannoni and the race critic and psychiatrist Frantz Fanon, this article readdresses the Freudian concept of denial and the way it can be used as a powerful analyzer of the persistence of racism. Supporting both the libidinal fixation through the making up of a fetish, and the ego splitting between knowledge and belief, denial reveals itself to be one of the consistent means by which imperialism maintains itself after the loss of an Empire. Preventing political and subjective decolonization by sustaining jouissance (enjoyment), the paradoxical way conceived by Lacan to theorize how the subject tries to encounter and escape his/her own ontological fragility, denial is here considered itself as an Empire, insofar as it allows the subject of the unconscious to remain alienated to colonial ideals and to benefit from that, even if in ambiguous ways.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39339,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in Gender and Sexuality\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in Gender and Sexuality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15240657.2021.1996738\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Gender and Sexuality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15240657.2021.1996738","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文通过重新审视法国精神分析学家奥克塔夫·曼诺尼与种族批评家和精神病学家弗朗茨·法农之间被认为是失败的相遇,重新诠释了弗洛伊德的否认概念,以及它可以作为种族主义持续存在的有力分析工具的方式。否认通过对恋物的编造来支持力比多的固定,以及在知识和信仰之间的自我分裂,揭示了自己是帝国主义在失去帝国后维持自身的一贯手段之一。通过维持欢爽(享受)来防止政治和主观的去殖民化,这是拉康设想的自相矛盾的方式,来理论化主体如何试图遇到和逃避他/她自己的本体论脆弱性,否认在这里被认为是一个帝国,只要它允许无意识的主体保持与殖民理想的异化,并从中受益,即使以模棱两可的方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Empire of Denial
ABSTRACT By reconsidering the supposedly failed encounter between the French psychoanalyst Octave Mannoni and the race critic and psychiatrist Frantz Fanon, this article readdresses the Freudian concept of denial and the way it can be used as a powerful analyzer of the persistence of racism. Supporting both the libidinal fixation through the making up of a fetish, and the ego splitting between knowledge and belief, denial reveals itself to be one of the consistent means by which imperialism maintains itself after the loss of an Empire. Preventing political and subjective decolonization by sustaining jouissance (enjoyment), the paradoxical way conceived by Lacan to theorize how the subject tries to encounter and escape his/her own ontological fragility, denial is here considered itself as an Empire, insofar as it allows the subject of the unconscious to remain alienated to colonial ideals and to benefit from that, even if in ambiguous ways.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Studies in Gender and Sexuality
Studies in Gender and Sexuality Social Sciences-Gender Studies
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: Beginning in the final two decades of the 20th century, the study of gender and sexuality has been revived from a variety of directions: the traditions of feminist scholarship, postclassical and postmodern psychoanalytic theory, developmental research, and cultural studies have all contributed to renewed fascination with those powerfully formative aspects of subjectivity that fall within the rubric of "gender" and "sexuality." Clinicians, for their part, have returned to gender and sexuality with heightened sensitivity to the role of these constructs in the treatment situation, including the richly variegated ways in which assumptions about gender and sexuality enter into our understandings of "normality" and "pathology."
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信